House Select Committee Hearings on Jan. 6 (1 Viewer)

Thread Attachment browser

Users who are viewing this thread

    Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
    Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump may have been aware of a plan to overturn the 2020 election more than three months before the Jan. 6 insurrection, according to documentary film evidence obtained by the House Select Committee.

    Congressional investigators believe plans for disrupting the Jan. 6 certification of the November election results were communicated to advisers to Trump Jr. and his fiancée Kimberly Guilfoyle before the election had taken place, and documentary filmmaker Alex Holder appears to have evidence to prove this was true, Guardian reporter Hugo Lowell told MSNBC's "Morning Joe."

    "Jamie Raskin, a member of the select committee got a tip that Alex Holde had sat down for these one-on-one interviews with the former president himself and a number of Trump's adult children," Lowell said. "Now, what also emerged during that deposition is that the documentary film crew got access to the Trump Hotel on the 29th of September of 2020. That was the night of the first debate, and that's really significant because Alex Holder was able to record Don Jr. and Eric and others on the phone and having candid private conversations among each other about strategies with respect to the 2020 election."

    That date is significant not just because it came before the election, but because it shows there was a coordinated plan among the Trump family and their allies to disrupt a potential loss by the president...........

     
    Hutchinson just testified under oath that Trump knew the Secret Service was keeping out people with weapons, and said he didn't care, "they're not here to hurt me," and that the Secret Service should just take away the metal detectors and let them march to the Capitol from the Ellipse.

    He knew they had weapons (not for him) and that their intent was to march on the Capitol, and he wanted the Secret Service to remove metal detectors and let them through. Then he instructed them to march to the Capitol.

    He's forking done.
     
    Trump knew the crowd was armed - pistols, knives and rifles were confiscated. His only concern was that people were staying outside of the immediate area with the metal detectors and his crowd wouldn’t look big enough. He said ‘they’re not here to hurt me, I don’t care if they have weapons, take the metal detectors away, and let them in’.

    he was told that they weren’t coming into the ellipse because they didn’t want their weapons confiscated.
     
    GrandAdmiral said:
    Hearing is streaming live now.

    In other news...

    www.cnn.com

    'This is a bombshell': Trump aides left speechless by Hutchinson testimony

    Aides to former President Donald Trump were left speechless amid the first half of Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony on Tuesday, acknowledging to CNN that her testimony was "a bombshell" with potentially huge repercussions for Trump.
    www.cnn.com www.cnn.com
    Click to expand...
    Trump should be f'ing nervous about her testimony because so far she's exposed the fact that trump knew that his supporters had weapons and told the SS to remove the metal detectors because the crowd was not there to hurt him. Put this man in jail NOW!
     
    Mark Meadows was aware also, before the speech, that weapons were being confiscated and did nothing. When he was told that there were attacks at the Capitol during Trump’s speech, he did nothing.
     
    Saintamaniac said:
    Trump should be f'ing nervous about her testimony because so far she's exposed the fact that trump knew that his supporters had weapons and told the SS to remove the metal detectors because the crowd was not there to hurt him. Put this man in jail NOW!
    Click to expand...
    Yep. Garland should be convening a grand jury for this shirt.
     
    Pat Cipollone literally told them that obstruction, fraud, and inciting a riot were the crimes they would be committing if they went to the Capitol. Trump wanted to go anyway.
     
    To be fair, I think this part of the testimony wouldn't be allowed in court. It's hearsay, right?

    Edit: Specifically, the events inside the Beast. She is telling what someone told her happened in the Beast, but she has no proof of.
     

    Create an account or login to comment

    You must be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create account

    Create an account on our community. It's easy!

    Register

    Log in

    Already have an account? Log in here.

    Share this page

    Advertisement

    General News Feed

    Fact Checkers News Feed

    Sponsored

    Back
    Top Bottom