- Banned
- #1
SaintForLife
Well-known member
Offline
This isnt deserving of it's own thread, but we dont have a thread for general Democrat subjects.
I almost thought this was a joke:
I almost thought this was a joke:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Best and brightest…Best and brightest...
Sen. John Fetterman ripped for pulling shotgun on unarmed black jogger after Juneteenth post
Many were quick to point out that the the Pennsylvania Democrat had once pulled a shotgun on an unarmed black jogger.nypost.com
It's hilarious that you are so quick to defend people in Congress who are profiting off their inside knowledge. Most people are concerned about Congress and insider trading and here you are defending then in every instance.SFL: Since you alleging insider trading, you should be able to answer these questions:
Who exactly tightened the chip sales to China? What agency of the government? When was the decision made? Was this move announced in advance? When was it announced? Do you have any sort of indication that Pelosi would have known some information that wasn’t public knowledge back in July?
If you cannot answer these questions, this is nothing but a smear. Which is nothing new for you to be perfectly honest. It just sucks that you have no problem posting in this manner.
You have a problem with reality. I didn’t defend anyone. At all. So either you have immense comprehension issues with plain language or you are specifically lying about what I said. If you want to say that this particular trade was made using insider information, you would need to be able to answer those questions. I merely asked what you knew in order to prove your allegation.It's hilarious that you are so quick to defend people in Congress who are profiting off their inside knowledge. Most people are concerned about Congress and insider trading and here you are defending then in every instance.
You are the first one to jump the defense of any congressman or Senator whenever someone has posted anything about who benefits from war in Congress.You have a problem with reality. I didn’t defend anyone. At all. So either you have immense comprehension issues with plain language or you are specifically lying about what I said. If you want to say that this particular trade was made using insider information, you would need to be able to answer those questions. I merely asked what you knew in order to prove your allegation.
FWIW, I believe MOC should be banned from trading individual stocks. But accusing without proof is a punk move by you. And hypocritical as hell because of this:
You whine a lot on here because you say that Trump was accused of stuff without proof (he wasn’t). But yet you have zero issues accusing people you don’t like of doing things without any proof at all.
You obviously cannot answer any of those questions, therefore what you are doing is throwing shirt at the wall here. Pretty much all you do these days, IMO.
For the second time - asking for actual proof that a trade was based on insider information isn’t “defending” anyone. You are slinging crap without any proof - which you continually whine about when you think it is being done to your champion and soon to be convict - Trump.You are the first one to jump the defense of any congressman or Senator whenever someone has posted anything about who benefits from war in Congress.
We know that people in Congress participate in insider trading, writing legislation to benefit their biggest campaign contributors, and come out of Congress worth millions and yet you defend them here from every time this subject is brought up.
You are talking about Trump right now? I swear you can't make many posts without blaming something on Putin, Trump or racism. It's definitely a pathological obsession.
You act like I don't know your normal routine. You ask for proof and then when you are shown that proof you go into some long vague word salad that does nothing to address the proof.For the second time - asking for actual proof that a trade was based on insider information isn’t “defending” anyone. You are slinging crap without any proof - which you continually whine about when you think it is being done to your champion and soon to be convict - Trump.
You need to quit calling me pathological for pointing out your hypocrisy and trolling. It’s weak sauce.
Either come up with proof - anything! - about that particular trade or quit posting shirt you have no proof for. It weakens the case for actually doing something about real insider trading when you label everything as such. This isn’t rocket science. Good lord. School children know that if you cry wolf about everything people quit believing anything you say.
You act like I don't know your normal routine. You ask for proof and then when you are shown that proof you go into some long vague word salad that does nothing to address the proof.
Whether it's insider trading or just Congressman benefiting financially from war that they vote to fund, it's corruption and I'm not surprised you defend it since you support the US war machine and any funding it requires.
That's not a personal attack. I'm simply stating what her normal routine is here when confronted with something she doesn't like or believe.Not that MT needs anyone to defend her, but this entire post is complete bullshirt and your personal attacks are getting old and tiresome.
As for your posts? Please.That's not a personal attack. I'm simply stating what her normal routine is here when confronted with something she doesn't like or believe.
I don't think I've seen any posts from her criticizing any wars we have been involved in or Congress getting rich from their stocks that just happen to be on areas where they are involved with legislation or committees.
You don’t know what I will do when you show proof because you are incapable of actually showing proof. I ask for proof, you give either propaganda or opinions or conjecture, I explain why it isn’t proof and then you get all pissy and call it word salad, lol.You act like I don't know your normal routine. You ask for proof and then when you are shown that proof you go into some long vague word salad that does nothing to address the proof.
Whether it's insider trading or just Congressman benefiting financially from war that they vote to fund, it's corruption and I'm not surprised you defend it since you support the US war machine and any funding it requires.