Democrat Tracker (1 Viewer)

Users who are viewing this thread

    SaintForLife

    Well-known member
    Joined
    Oct 5, 2019
    Messages
    7,313
    Reaction score
    3,404
    Location
    Madisonville
    Offline
    This isnt deserving of it's own thread, but we dont have a thread for general Democrat subjects.

    I almost thought this was a joke:


     
    Three month old story about a years old story trying to trash Fetterman.

    I guess the body double crap wasn't working.
     
    I think it’s pretty easy to see that there is some desperation going on here. Have to throw a whole bunch of shirt at the wall and hope to hell something sticks because the House R party is going down in flames, Trump is collapsing, and people are generally fed up with Republican BS.
     
    SFL: Since you alleging insider trading, you should be able to answer these questions:

    Who exactly tightened the chip sales to China? What agency of the government? When was the decision made? Was this move announced in advance? When was it announced? Do you have any sort of indication that Pelosi would have known some information that wasn’t public knowledge back in July?

    If you cannot answer these questions, this is nothing but a smear. Which is nothing new for you to be perfectly honest. It just sucks that you have no problem posting in this manner.
     
    SFL: Since you alleging insider trading, you should be able to answer these questions:

    Who exactly tightened the chip sales to China? What agency of the government? When was the decision made? Was this move announced in advance? When was it announced? Do you have any sort of indication that Pelosi would have known some information that wasn’t public knowledge back in July?

    If you cannot answer these questions, this is nothing but a smear. Which is nothing new for you to be perfectly honest. It just sucks that you have no problem posting in this manner.
    It's hilarious that you are so quick to defend people in Congress who are profiting off their inside knowledge. Most people are concerned about Congress and insider trading and here you are defending then in every instance.
     
    It's hilarious that you are so quick to defend people in Congress who are profiting off their inside knowledge. Most people are concerned about Congress and insider trading and here you are defending then in every instance.
    You have a problem with reality. I didn’t defend anyone. At all. So either you have immense comprehension issues with plain language or you are specifically lying about what I said. If you want to say that this particular trade was made using insider information, you would need to be able to answer those questions. I merely asked what you knew in order to prove your allegation.

    FWIW, I believe MOC should be banned from trading individual stocks. But accusing without proof is a punk move by you. And hypocritical as hell because of this:

    You whine a lot on here because you say that Trump was accused of stuff without proof (he wasn’t). But yet you have zero issues accusing people you don’t like of doing things without any proof at all.

    You obviously cannot answer any of those questions, therefore what you are doing is throwing shirt at the wall here. Pretty much all you do these days, IMO.
     
    You have a problem with reality. I didn’t defend anyone. At all. So either you have immense comprehension issues with plain language or you are specifically lying about what I said. If you want to say that this particular trade was made using insider information, you would need to be able to answer those questions. I merely asked what you knew in order to prove your allegation.

    FWIW, I believe MOC should be banned from trading individual stocks. But accusing without proof is a punk move by you. And hypocritical as hell because of this:

    You whine a lot on here because you say that Trump was accused of stuff without proof (he wasn’t). But yet you have zero issues accusing people you don’t like of doing things without any proof at all.

    You obviously cannot answer any of those questions, therefore what you are doing is throwing shirt at the wall here. Pretty much all you do these days, IMO.
    You are the first one to jump the defense of any congressman or Senator whenever someone has posted anything about who benefits from war in Congress.

    We know that people in Congress participate in insider trading, writing legislation to benefit their biggest campaign contributors, and come out of Congress worth millions and yet you defend them here from every time this subject is brought up.

    You are talking about Trump right now? I swear you can't make many posts without blaming something on Putin, Trump or racism. It's definitely a pathological obsession.
     
    You are the first one to jump the defense of any congressman or Senator whenever someone has posted anything about who benefits from war in Congress.

    We know that people in Congress participate in insider trading, writing legislation to benefit their biggest campaign contributors, and come out of Congress worth millions and yet you defend them here from every time this subject is brought up.

    You are talking about Trump right now? I swear you can't make many posts without blaming something on Putin, Trump or racism. It's definitely a pathological obsession.
    For the second time - asking for actual proof that a trade was based on insider information isn’t “defending” anyone. You are slinging crap without any proof - which you continually whine about when you think it is being done to your champion and soon to be convict - Trump.

    You need to quit calling me pathological for pointing out your hypocrisy and trolling. It’s weak sauce.

    Either come up with proof - anything! - about that particular trade or quit posting shirt you have no proof for. It weakens the case for actually doing something about real insider trading when you label everything as such. This isn’t rocket science. Good lord. School children know that if you cry wolf about everything people quit believing anything you say.
     
    For the second time - asking for actual proof that a trade was based on insider information isn’t “defending” anyone. You are slinging crap without any proof - which you continually whine about when you think it is being done to your champion and soon to be convict - Trump.

    You need to quit calling me pathological for pointing out your hypocrisy and trolling. It’s weak sauce.

    Either come up with proof - anything! - about that particular trade or quit posting shirt you have no proof for. It weakens the case for actually doing something about real insider trading when you label everything as such. This isn’t rocket science. Good lord. School children know that if you cry wolf about everything people quit believing anything you say.
    You act like I don't know your normal routine. You ask for proof and then when you are shown that proof you go into some long vague word salad that does nothing to address the proof.

    Whether it's insider trading or just Congressman benefiting financially from war that they vote to fund, it's corruption and I'm not surprised you defend it since you support the US war machine and any funding it requires.
     
    You act like I don't know your normal routine. You ask for proof and then when you are shown that proof you go into some long vague word salad that does nothing to address the proof.

    Whether it's insider trading or just Congressman benefiting financially from war that they vote to fund, it's corruption and I'm not surprised you defend it since you support the US war machine and any funding it requires.

    Not that MT needs anyone to defend her, but this entire post is complete bullshirt and your personal attacks are getting old and tiresome.
     
    Not that MT needs anyone to defend her, but this entire post is complete bullshirt and your personal attacks are getting old and tiresome.
    That's not a personal attack. I'm simply stating what her normal routine is here when confronted with something she doesn't like or believe.

    I don't think I've seen any posts from her criticizing any wars we have been involved in or Congress getting rich from their stocks that just happen to be on areas where they are involved with legislation or committees.
     
    Last edited:
    That's not a personal attack. I'm simply stating what her normal routine is here when confronted with something she doesn't like or believe.

    I don't think I've seen any posts from her criticizing any wars we have been involved in or Congress getting rich from their stocks that just happen to be on areas where they are involved with legislation or committees.
    As for your posts? Please.
     
    You act like I don't know your normal routine. You ask for proof and then when you are shown that proof you go into some long vague word salad that does nothing to address the proof.

    Whether it's insider trading or just Congressman benefiting financially from war that they vote to fund, it's corruption and I'm not surprised you defend it since you support the US war machine and any funding it requires.
    You don’t know what I will do when you show proof because you are incapable of actually showing proof. I ask for proof, you give either propaganda or opinions or conjecture, I explain why it isn’t proof and then you get all pissy and call it word salad, lol.

    You have been warned before about your war monger smears. You need to can it, and quit misrepresenting my views.
     

    Create an account or login to comment

    You must be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create account

    Create an account on our community. It's easy!

    Log in

    Already have an account? Log in here.

    General News Feed

    Fact Checkers News Feed

    Back
    Top Bottom