Will “mass deportation” actually happen (1 Viewer)

Users who are viewing this thread

    superchuck500

    U.S. Blues
    Joined
    Mar 26, 2019
    Messages
    5,656
    Reaction score
    14,543
    Location
    Charleston, SC
    Offline
    It’s so repulsive to see people cheering for what is basically 80% the same thing as the Holocaust - different end result but otherwise very similar.

    Economists have said it would tank the economy and cause inflation - notwithstanding the cost.

    Is it going to actually happen or is this Build The Wall 2.0?

     

    On March 14, Washington, D.C., became the latest city to approve noncitizen voting, when a bill allowing the District’s roughly 42,000 noncitizens, including those who are undocumented, to vote in municipal elections became law after a bid by congressional Republicans to overturn it fell short.
    These are only municipal elections, we have been discussing the federal election, specifically the presidential election. If you would actually read the article you are quoting it gives a pretty good overview of the rationale behind allowing non-citizens to vote for school boards and local government. It also mentions that non-citizens were voting since practically the beginning of our Republic in some elections.

    What you have failed to address is that your first article, which you have been misrepresenting as proof of “thousands” of non-citizens voting in the federal election in TX, actually says that nobody has proof of anything of the sort happening. Care to address that?
     
    These are only municipal elections, we have been discussing the federal election, specifically the presidential election. If you would actually read the article you are quoting it gives a pretty good overview of the rationale behind allowing non-citizens to vote for school boards and local government. It also mentions that non-citizens were voting since practically the beginning of our Republic in some elections.

    What you have failed to address is that your first article, which you have been misrepresenting as proof of “thousands” of non-citizens voting in the federal election in TX, actually says that nobody has proof of anything of the sort happening. Care to address that?
    I read the article well. My initial post said any number is to many. The article list out several states where errors were recorded ON NATIONAL ELECTIONS.

    Will you admit that you had no idea that states were allowing non citizens to vote?
     
    I read the article well. My initial post said any number is to many. The article list out several states where errors were recorded ON NATIONAL ELECTIONS.

    Will you admit that you had no idea that states were allowing non citizens to vote?
    This is giving me flashbacks - your slip is showing, lol.

    I already knew some places allow non-citizens to vote in municipal elections. This isn’t even something new.

    Will you admit you have presented zero proof of “thousands” of non-citizens voting in any federal elections in TX or anywhere else? That was what you have been claiming for days now, after all.

    No states are “allowing” non-citizens to vote in federal elections. There could be a tiny number who try it and get caught - on a similar scale as the MAGA voters who vote twice or fill out a mail ballot for their dead spouse or their son. You don’t seem all bent out of shape about those. 🤷‍♀️
     
    This is giving me flashbacks - your slip is showing, lol.

    I already knew some places allow non-citizens to vote in municipal elections. This isn’t even something new.

    Will you admit you have presented zero proof of “thousands” of non-citizens voting in any federal elections in TX or anywhere else? That was what you have been claiming for days now, after all.

    No states are “allowing” non-citizens to vote in federal elections. There could be a tiny number who try it and get caught - on a similar scale as the MAGA voters who vote twice or fill out a mail ballot for their dead spouse or their son. You don’t seem all bent out of shape about those. 🤷‍♀️
    Please read the article. Would you like me to list each state. Off the top of my head, ohio was 168.
     
    Please read the article. Would you like me to list each state. Off the top of my head, ohio was 168.
    Here’s the entire Ohio discussion - you don’t seem all realize that this entire article is reporting GOP claims, right? Not facts - just GOP claims?

    In a state with about 8 million registered voters, a recent review of Ohio’s voter rolls resulted in the removal of 154,995 abandoned or inactive voter registrations. A far smaller number, 597, have been referred by Secretary of State Frank LaRose to the state’s attorney general for “further review and potential prosecution” for possibly registering to vote as a noncitizen. However, an even smaller number, 138, “appear to have cast a ballot in an Ohio election,” he said in a statement.

    LaRose, a Republican, wants more power to require proof of citizenship for voter registration. No one appears to have been charged with any crime.

    “It’s rare. But we keep it rare by enforcing the law,” LaRose said of noncitizens casting ballots during a hearing Wednesday on Capitol Hill, where he pushed for the legislation to require proof of citizenship to register.

    Giving the opposing argument at the same hearing, Arizona’s secretary of state, Democrat Adrian Fontes, argued that a 2004 ballot initiative that created a requirement for proof of citizenship to register to vote in his state had disenfranchised 47,000 people.

    “I take no pride in the idea that we have denied eligible citizens the right to vote in far greater numbers than we would have prevented the vanishingly rare noncitizen voting that is alleged to be happening across the United States of America,” Fontes said.

    Even though the instances of undocumented voter registration or voting are so rare and the few known instances are referred for prosecution, LaRose said during the hearing there should be “zero tolerance,” because, “every year, dozens of elections in Ohio come down to a single vote. And those are usually local elections, but those matter.”
     
    So 168 is a GOP claim for Ohio. Here’s the companion article CNN wrote debunking the GOP claims in its other article. It was linked at the beginning of the article:

     

    Create an account or login to comment

    You must be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create account

    Create an account on our community. It's easy!

    Log in

    Already have an account? Log in here.

    General News Feed

    Fact Checkers News Feed

    Back
    Top Bottom