Will “mass deportation” actually happen (1 Viewer)

[superchuck500]

It’s so repulsive to see people cheering for what is basically 80% the same thing as the Holocaust - different end result but otherwise very similar.

Economists have said it would tank the economy and cause inflation - notwithstanding the cost.

Is it going to actually happen or is this Build The Wall 2.0?

 

[Dragon]

All good. Do you have more than 60k that are not from Denmark originally? Meaning is 90% of your country NATIVE WHITE skinned people. Its ok, there is nothing wrong with that, just be honest about it.

No, 90% are not considered native, as immigrants (within three generations) make up 18% of the population, so they are not originally from Denmark. However, I couldn’t tell you if they are white or not, and I can’t tell you how many native Danes are white or not either.

The real question is: does the color of people’s skin matter at all? Your repeated focus on the term "black" in multiple threads here comes across as racially focused, and it feels problematic.

 

[horse2H5]

No, 90% are not considered native, as immigrants (within three generations) make up 18% of the population, so they are not originally from Denmark. However, I couldn’t tell you if they are white or not, and I can’t tell you how many native Danes are white or not either.

The real question is: does the color of people’s skin matter at all? Your repeated focus on the term "black" in multiple threads here comes across as racially focused, and it feels problematic.

Not to me. But you alluded well questioned whether it was racist for me to talk about black on black crime when it comes to gun control. I am simply pointing out that you have zero daily experiences with minorities in your country. A person from denmark is the epitome of white privilege.

 

[RobF]

All good. Do you have more than 60k that are not from Denmark originally? Meaning is 90% of your country NATIVE WHITE skinned people. Its ok, there is nothing wrong with that, just be honest about it.

I feel like I've facepalmed a lot of your posts, so I think I should add some context:

Your posts show a repeated, astonishing, lack of comprehension of the posts you're replying to and I find my palm hits my face when I read them.

As here: you have someone telling you a country doesn't record particular statistics. And you're repeatedly going, "do you disagree with my statistics," that you cited as "according to Google". And you, apparently, have no awareness whatsoever that's not how this works. Hence, facepalm.

Please be aware that if your reply to this shows a similar lack of comprehension, it's unlikely to receive a response.

 

[horse2H5]

I feel like I've facepalmed a lot of your posts, so I think I should add some context:

Your posts show a repeated, astonishing, lack of comprehension of the posts you're replying to and I find my palm hits my face when I read them.

As here: you have someone telling you a country doesn't record particular statistics. And you're repeatedly going, "do you disagree with my statistics," that you cited as "according to Google". And you, apparently, have no awareness whatsoever that's not how this works. Hence, facepalm.

Please be aware that if your reply to this shows a similar lack of comprehension, it's unlikely to receive a response.

Thanks Rob, but reading comprehension goes both ways. We have a ton of technology today. I do rely upon research to make sure my opinions are backed up by fact. Don't get me wrong, I make mistakes, but this is not a mistake. Denmark and all of the slavic countries are 90% white (give or take a percentage here or there per country). I am not only going off of what is found by the internet, I have traveled that area 7 times in the last 12 years. Anecdotally, the only non white people are tourist. Now in fairness, I have not been to Denmark, but why would that be different than my personal experience and that of the internet.

 

[Dragon]

Not to me. But you alluded well questioned whether it was racist for me to talk about black on black crime when it comes to gun control. I am simply pointing out that you have zero daily experiences with minorities in your country. A person from denmark is the epitome of white privilege.

Skin color and minority status are two different things. As I’ve mentioned several times, we do have minorities in Denmark, and currently, those within three generations make up 18% of our population. However, you keep focusing on skin color rather than whether people are native or not.

The cultural differences can be significant for a white-skinned immigrant from Albania, while minimal for a black-skinned immigrant from the U.S. The focus should be on culture and integration, not on skin color.

 

[Dragon]

Thanks Rob, but reading comprehension goes both ways. We have a ton of technology today. I do rely upon research to make sure my opinions are backed up by fact. Don't get me wrong, I make mistakes, but this is not a mistake. Denmark and all of the slavic countries are 90% white (give or take a percentage here or there per country). I am not only going off of what is found by the internet, I have traveled that area 7 times in the last 12 years. Anecdotally, the only non white people are tourist. Now in fairness, I have not been to Denmark, but why would that be different than my personal experience and that of the internet.

Denmark is NOT a slavic country. So once again - you "sources" are wrong

 

[horse2H5]

Denmark is NOT a slavic country. So once again - you "sources" are wrong

lolololololololol. Nordic/slavic all EXTREMELY WHITE. I think maybe where whiteness originated.

 

[Dragon]

lolololololololol. Nordic/slavic all EXTREMELY WHITE. I think maybe where whiteness originated.

Your focus on skin color is misguided. There is a huge cultural difference between a Nordic country and a Slavic country, with each having its own distinct traditions and values. But rather than focusing on culture, you continue to emphasize skin color.

Skin color is just a surface characteristic—it says nothing about a person’s values, culture, or personal traits. So why does skin color matter so much to you?

 

[horse2H5]

Your focus on skin color is misguided. There is a huge cultural difference between a Nordic country and a Slavic country, with each having its own distinct traditions and values. But rather than focusing on culture, you continue to emphasize skin color.

Skin color is just a surface characteristic—it says nothing about a person’s values, culture, or personal traits. So why does skin color matter so much to you?

I agree 100%!!! We need to let our fellow liberals know this as well. Stop treating people with different standards. If you break the law, your skin color should not matter. You should be subject to penalty. Instead we find reasons to not hurt the poor and minorities. I don't have to explain to this board. There is page after page after page talking about how white America is the Devil. The Robot guy post an article a couple times a week expressing as much.

We are just tired of all the pandering and so are the black conservatives in our country. Hence the landslide for TRUMP!

 

[Dragon]

I agree 100%!!! We need to let our fellow liberals know this as well. Stop treating people with different standards. If you break the law, your skin color should not matter. You should be subject to penalty. Instead we find reasons to not hurt the poor and minorities. I don't have to explain to this board. There is page after page after page talking about how white America is the Devil. The Robot guy post an article a couple times a week expressing as much.

We are just tired of all the pandering and so are the black conservatives in our country. Hence the landslide for TRUMP!

Show me statistic that prove that point. I've seen several that shows the opposite but since you make the claim you get to prove it. Equal crimes

 

[Dragon]

U.S. Sentencing Commission Report (2017): A study by the U.S. Sentencing Commission found that Black male offenders in the federal system received, on average, sentences that were 19.1% longer than those of white male offenders for similar crimes. This is based on a comprehensive study of federal sentencing practices.

https://www.ussc.gov/about/annual-r..., 79.8 percent of all,48.6 percent in FY 2016.

 

[horse2H5]

U.S. Sentencing Commission Report (2017): A study by the U.S. Sentencing Commission found that Black male offenders in the federal system received, on average, sentences that were 19.1% longer than those of white male offenders for similar crimes. This is based on a comprehensive study of federal sentencing practices.

https://www.ussc.gov/about/annual-report/archive/annual-report-2017#:~:text=Overall, 79.8 percent of all,48.6 percent in FY 2016.

Not sure what you are trying to prove with this info. 1 its federal cases, 2 it has nothing to do with criminals being let go with lax sentencing or no sentencing when a stolen gun is found our a crime is committed with a gun.

This is why we don't fix gun crime, the left does not want to be honest about the problem. If we are honest, we may offend the poor and minorities and that is unacceptable. Meanwhile their children are killed day after day. And the left blames whitey. lol

 

[MT15]

did you read the article posted above? Is the article incorrect? Do you have info that counters the fact that thousands of illegals voted in Texas alone?

How embarrassing for you to be flogging this article for days and you evidently never read it yourself.

Dragon has kindly posted the truth - there weren’t “thousands” of non-citizens voting in TX or anywhere else. It’s all made up by the GOP to give them excuses for what they want to do.

 

[horse2H5]

How embarrassing for you to be flogging this article for days and you evidently never read it yourself.

Dragon has kindly posted the truth - there weren’t “thousands” of non-citizens voting in TX or anywhere else. It’s all made up by the GOP to give them excuses for what they want to do.

I read it very well. I can post more if you would like.

 

[horse2H5]

Noncitizens allowed to vote in some local elections, spurring backlash from GOP • Colorado Newsline

A few cities and towns around the U.S. are letting noncitizens vote in local elections, and more could follow.

coloradonewsline.com

On March 14, Washington, D.C., became the latest city to approve noncitizen voting, when a bill allowing the District’s roughly 42,000 noncitizens, including those who are undocumented, to vote in municipal elections became law after a bid by congressional Republicans to overturn it fell short.

 

[horse2H5]

How embarrassing for you to be flogging this article for days and you evidently never read it yourself.

Dragon has kindly posted the truth - there weren’t “thousands” of non-citizens voting in TX or anywhere else. It’s all made up by the GOP to give them excuses for what they want to do.

Please retract.

 

[MT15]

Noncitizens allowed to vote in some local elections, spurring backlash from GOP • Colorado Newsline

A few cities and towns around the U.S. are letting noncitizens vote in local elections, and more could follow.

coloradonewsline.com

On March 14, Washington, D.C., became the latest city to approve noncitizen voting, when a bill allowing the District’s roughly 42,000 noncitizens, including those who are undocumented, to vote in municipal elections became law after a bid by congressional Republicans to overturn it fell short.

These are only municipal elections, we have been discussing the federal election, specifically the presidential election. If you would actually read the article you are quoting it gives a pretty good overview of the rationale behind allowing non-citizens to vote for school boards and local government. It also mentions that non-citizens were voting since practically the beginning of our Republic in some elections.

What you have failed to address is that your first article, which you have been misrepresenting as proof of “thousands” of non-citizens voting in the federal election in TX, actually says that nobody has proof of anything of the sort happening. Care to address that?

 

[MT15]

Hence the landslide for TRUMP!

Less than 50% of the votes for President were for Trump. You shouldn’t keep calling it a landslide.