What happens to the Democratic Party now? (1 Viewer)

[Heathen]

I’m sure much of us are having 2016 flashbacks this morning with a sick feeling to our stomachs..

2 of the last 3 elections Democrats have lost to a far right demagogue

Harris didn’t get close in many states to even Biden’s performance. We could very well lose the Presidency, Senate AND House depending on results the next few days…..

What went wrong?
What could’ve been done better?
What can we change in the future to ensure voters are motivated like they were when Obama was elected?

Democrats have no choice but to admit there’s a huge problem with some aspect of their platform— and to do a deep introspection of what’s going wrong..

 

[horse2H5]

Google is your friend

I only ask when I can't find anything. I can't find where a woman is getting charged if she gets an abortion in a different state. Can you give me a statute or anything to go on to back up your statement?

 

[Dragon]

I only ask when I can't find anything. I can't find where a woman is getting charged if she gets an abortion in a different state. Can you give me a statute or anything to go on to back up your statement?

Crossing State Lines: Texas’s Abortion Bounty-Hunter Law Implicates Those Who Assist Individuals to Get an Abortion Out-of-State, Including Employers | Published by Villanova Law Review

Hailey Valerio discusses uncertainty surrounding statutes imposing liability for assisting a person to travel out-of-state for an abortion post Dobbs.

www.villanovalawreview.com

 

[horse2H5]

Crossing State Lines: Texas’s Abortion Bounty-Hunter Law Implicates Those Who Assist Individuals to Get an Abortion Out-of-State, Including Employers | Published by Villanova Law Review

Hailey Valerio discusses uncertainty surrounding statutes imposing liability for assisting a person to travel out-of-state for an abortion post Dobbs.

www.villanovalawreview.com

from your article. lol. You do understand the difference in civil and criminal?



However, this constitutional workaround has also presented its own challenges. The Oklahoma Supreme Court found its aiding and abetting law unconstitutional. [9] Texas’s statute, which has been challenged in several lawsuits at the state and federal level, remains in effect, though, because courts struggle to hold the enforcement mechanism unconstitutional because it is enforced by private citizens, not the government. [10] Yet, the only suit brought so far under the aiding and abetting provision was dismissed in a Texas district court, due to a lack of sufficient evidence of injury to the plaintiff. [11] The Court found that bringing a civil action under this statute cannot be brought by someone remotely aware that an abortion took place without specific injury to the plaintiff. [12]

 

[Dragon]

from your article. lol. You do understand the difference in civil and criminal?



However, this constitutional workaround has also presented its own challenges. The Oklahoma Supreme Court found its aiding and abetting law unconstitutional. [9] Texas’s statute, which has been challenged in several lawsuits at the state and federal level, remains in effect, though, because courts struggle to hold the enforcement mechanism unconstitutional because it is enforced by private citizens, not the government. [10] Yet, the only suit brought so far under the aiding and abetting provision was dismissed in a Texas district court, due to a lack of sufficient evidence of injury to the plaintiff. [11] The Court found that bringing a civil action under this statute cannot be brought by someone remotely aware that an abortion took place without specific injury to the plaintiff. [12]

And yet the facts are the same - you cant just travel to another state from Texas to get an abortion without facing legal consequences

 

[horse2H5]

And yet the facts are the same - you cant just travel to another state from Texas to get an abortion without facing legal consequences

Simply not true. Please read your own article.

 

[SFIDC3]

So you finally admit that you want to force your beliefs on others. Got it I do respect that some people won't have an abortion due to THEIR beliefs but why should they decide the fate of others who don't share the same belief ?

Because they think their "religious views" entitle them to do so.....they can't answer the question in a logical fashion because it is based on feelings, emotion and a book full of fairytales that, ironically, doesn't really condemn or say much about abortion.....