Trump Election Interference / Falsification of Business Records Criminal Trial (Trump guilty on all 34 Counts) (1 Viewer)

Users who are viewing this thread

    What will happen now that former President Donald Trump was found guilty (in 34 counts) by the jury?
    *
    Speculation on the judge relating to sentencing?
    *
    Appeals?
    *
    Political Damage?
    *
     
    I think the argument is that, for example, Hope Hicks testimony about conversations they had in 2017 were official acts, since he was president and she was an adviser, therefore, that testimony should be excluded.
    I would posit that conversations about things unrelated to official duties are not only not privileged, but also not official acts. Hope Hick's testimony is still valid.
     
    I think the argument is that, for example, Hope Hicks testimony about conversations they had in 2017 were official acts, since he was president and she was an adviser, therefore, that testimony should be excluded.
    That’s what I am reading. It’s almost like SCOTUS tailored this decision to help Trump. Who am I kidding. It’s exactly like that. They tailored the decision for a specific set of crimes that Trump committed. He’s going to get away with everything. Every single thing.

    And Thomas, the corrupt bribe taker, already wrote that he thinks Jack Smith isn’t properly appointed. So they have teed that case up quite nicely as well.

    This court is quite possibly the most corrupt court the US has ever seen. Major, sickening corruption.
     
    I would posit that conversations about things unrelated to official duties are not only not privileged, but also not official acts. Hope Hick's testimony is still valid.
    I think the wording of the decision is that their conversations are presumed to be privileged. And the case cannot consider Trump’s motivation to try to prove they are not privileged. In some cases, maybe not Hicks’, the prosecution cannot even mention the conversation at all.
     
    I think the wording of the decision is that their conversations are presumed to be privileged. And the case cannot consider Trump’s motivation to try to prove they are not privileged. In some cases, maybe not Hicks’, the prosecution cannot even mention the conversation at all.
    The thing is, we already know the content of the conversations. Maybe it changes, maybe not, idk. I don't think it does. But I definitely can see the defense appealing this part of the case, but I don't think it changes the decision. The judge will still proceed to the penalty phase in September after all that is done.
     
    What do they do when evidence that was allowed in during the trial is later deemed to be inadmissible? I think, but I don’t know, that they declare a mistrial.
     
    That’s what I am reading. It’s almost like SCOTUS tailored this decision to help Trump. Who am I kidding. It’s exactly like that. They tailored the decision for a specific set of crimes that Trump committed. He’s going to get away with everything. Every single thing.

    And Thomas, the corrupt bribe taker, already wrote that he thinks Jack Smith isn’t properly appointed. So they have teed that case up quite nicely as well.

    This court is quite possibly the most corrupt court the US has ever seen. Major, sickening corruption.
    Don't worry when they knock on hevans door there will be a big t on it. they open it ad the devil will greet them.
     
    Trump finally spoke the truth the courts are corrupt. but not in the way he keeps saying. this all seems liked together they all got together and planned this all out. the delays the SC crap rules all of it
     
    Last edited:
    Why delay the sentencing?

    Trump was going to appeal the sentence (no matter the sentence) even before the SCOTUS ruling, and remain free during that process

    Why not give the sentence now, he appeals, then consider if the immunity ruling affects the sentence during the appeal?
     
    Why delay the sentencing?

    Trump was going to appeal the sentence (no matter the sentence) even before the SCOTUS ruling, and remain free during that process

    Why not give the sentence now, he appeals, then consider if the immunity ruling affects the sentence during the appeal?
    From the lawyers I read, they all agreed this was the right thing to do. This will get the question out of the way before the appeal because if Trump prevails on this, the result could be a mistrial.

    Also, most criminal sentences are carried out immediately, they don’t usually allow the criminal to be free for the appeal. I don’t know about this case, though.
     
    Stormy Daniels’ supporters have raised more than $900,000 meant to help her move to a safe house and repay legal fees after testifying in the criminal trial that led to Donald Trump’s conviction on 34 felonies.

    The money comes from an online GoFundMe campaign started by a friend and former manager of the adult film actor, who recently appeared on MSNBC and described how supporters of Trumphave bombarded her with social media harassment as he seeks a second presidency, including threats to rape and murder her daughter and other family.

    “It’s become unsafe for her family and her pets,” the fundraiser’s organizer, Dwayne Crawford, wrote on the page for the campaign, which set a goal of $1m. “Stormy needs help to relocate her family to somewhere they can feel safe and live on their terms.


    “She needs assistance to be able to continue to pay the mounting fees so that Trump doesn’t just win because his pocketbook seems endless.”

    The so-called I Stand with Stormy Daniels campaign – which had raised more than $940,000 from about 17,600 donors as of Friday – follows her key role in getting Trump convicted in late May on charges of falsifying business records.……..


     
    Very bottom of tweet - "Jeff was my direct supervisor"

    I don't know, sounds like someone one might list as a legitimate reference

    Either that or it's proof of a deep state conspiracy theory
    It's not like Biden's Whitehouse was coordinating with Fani Willis office...oh wait they were. Just another innocent coincidence.
     
    Stormy Daniels’ supporters have raised more than $900,000 meant to help her move to a safe house and repay legal fees after testifying in the criminal trial that led to Donald Trump’s conviction on 34 felonies.

    The money comes from an online GoFundMe campaign started by a friend and former manager of the adult film actor, who recently appeared on MSNBC and described how supporters of Trumphave bombarded her with social media harassment as he seeks a second presidency, including threats to rape and murder her daughter and other family.

    “It’s become unsafe for her family and her pets,” the fundraiser’s organizer, Dwayne Crawford, wrote on the page for the campaign, which set a goal of $1m. “Stormy needs help to relocate her family to somewhere they can feel safe and live on their terms.


    “She needs assistance to be able to continue to pay the mounting fees so that Trump doesn’t just win because his pocketbook seems endless.”

    The so-called I Stand with Stormy Daniels campaign – which had raised more than $940,000 from about 17,600 donors as of Friday – follows her key role in getting Trump convicted in late May on charges of falsifying business records.……..



    They're wrongheaded and cruel, but you can't deny these RWNJs are passionate. Where's that same passion on the other side? Why aren't Rudy, Moscow Mitch and MTG living in fear?

    Dr Fauci lives with death threats and calls to imprison him for doing his job while the orange primate responsible for hundreds of thousands of deaths capers around without a care in the world. Why doesn't Cheato have to go everywhere behind bulletproof glass? Why aren't his kids forced to scurry between safehouses in the middle of the night?

    Is it just that there simply aren't many LWNJs?
     

    Create an account or login to comment

    You must be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create account

    Create an account on our community. It's easy!

    Log in

    Already have an account? Log in here.

    Advertisement

    General News Feed

    Fact Checkers News Feed

    Sponsored

    Back
    Top Bottom