Trump Election Interference / Falsification of Business Records Criminal Trial (Trump guilty on all 34 Counts) (1 Viewer)

Users who are viewing this thread

    What will happen now that former President Donald Trump was found guilty (in 34 counts) by the jury?
    *
    Speculation on the judge relating to sentencing?
    *
    Appeals?
    *
    Political Damage?
    *
     
    Only way I see that happening is if he forces the judge's hand with doing something absolutely stupid (which is totally possible considering the man). Trump will be out on bail while he appeals everything.
    Oh I don't doubt that. I'd be very surprised if he ever see the inside of a jail cell. If anything, more likely a confinement to his home or something like that. We'll see.
     
    I don’t particularly like it - I’ll say that. But the daily parade of Trump sycophants including the Speaker of the House definitely invited it. And we know that Trump has been involved in that. So I can’t really feel that much sympathy for a defendant who made it this kind of daily political circus.
    The sitting President is trying to jail his political opponent who is leading in the polls. Are you really surprised that Republicans were there publicly supporting Trump.

    If the roles were reversed and President Trump was trying to jail Biden, it would be front page news for months and you all would be calling it out for what it is.
    I think he thinks it helps him with the voters - he’s not trying to influence the jury, they don’t even see it. So if he’s campaigning on it, why is it so bad that the Biden campaign responded? It’s not a federal trial. And it’s Robert freakin DeNiro, not some government official (unlike Trump’s surrogates).
    Because Biden is the current President!
     
    Why wouldn't Garland commit to producing all communications between the DOJ, Bragg, Fani Willis and Leticia James offices? He clearly didn't want to answer the question.
    Why would agree to produce documents that don't exist? He's just humorist them and it's funny as fork.

    They keep using that word, lawfare, which was dreamed up by someone with too much time on their hands. Kudos I guess?
     
    Why wouldn't Garland commit to producing all communications between the DOJ, Bragg, Fani Willis and Leticia James offices? He clearly didn't want to answer the question.



    BigHead doesnt have the power to get those documents.

    You want them? get a subpeona.

    Until then, keep being the executive producer of the dog and pony show for your audience ( that includes you )
     
    The sitting President is trying to jail his political opponent who is leading in the polls.
    He really isn't. But hey, cool story bro.
    Are you really surprised that Republicans were there publicly supporting Trump.
    Considering the morons and brownosers running amuck in Congress, not surprising at all.
    If the roles were reversed and President Trump was trying to jail Biden, it would be front page news for months and you all would be calling it out for what it is.
    Um, no, we would direct our ire at Biden of it were true, and at the prosecutors if it were made up, why? Because Trump wouldn't have any control over the courts outside the jurisdiction of the DOJ. It's so obvious that the cultists can't separate fact from fiction.
    Because Biden is the current President!
    And? Good grief, lol.
     
    The sitting President is trying to jail his political opponent who is leading in the polls. Are you really surprised that Republicans were there publicly supporting Trump.

    If the roles were reversed and President Trump was trying to jail Biden, it would be front page news for months and you all would be calling it out for what it is.

    Because Biden is the current President!

    DERP
     
    this is your proof?

    a moment for Biden to gloat on the inanity of Trump and his own undoing is your proof?

    LOL. You guys are fully triggered.
    I find it hilarious as well.
     
    This is the trial you have been defending





    "The judge donated money - a tiny amount of $35, but in plain violation of a rule prohibiting New York judges from making political donations of any kind to a pro-Biden, anti-Trump political operation," he wrote in the NY Magazine.

    "The charges against Trump are obscure and nearly entirely unprecedented. In fact, no state prosecutor... has ever charged federal election laws as a direct or predicate state crime, against anyone, for anything."

    "None. Ever. Even putting aside the specifics of election law, the Manhattan DA itself almost never brings any case in which falsification of business records is the only charge."

    "The charges against Trump aren’t just unusual. They’re bespoke, seemingly crafted individually for the former president and nobody else," he said as he called the case "Frankenstein" because it was pieced together.

    During a segment on CNN, Honig said his mind was blown when the judge determined that the jury didn't need to know what the other crime Trump committed was.

    "I need to call this out... Prosecutors have to prove falsified records for another crime. Defense lawyers were begging him."

    "They have to know what the other crime is, and prosecutors were saying, 'no, let's keep it very vague and general.' It's a bizarro world."

    "I know that there is some aggressive reading of the New York statute that says, 'well, the jury doesn't really have to know what the other crime is.' But to me that suggests that the DA's office is hellbent on getting the conviction now and worry about the fallout."
     

    Create an account or login to comment

    You must be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create account

    Create an account on our community. It's easy!

    Log in

    Already have an account? Log in here.

    General News Feed

    Fact Checkers News Feed

    Back
    Top Bottom