Trump Election Interference / Falsification of Business Records Criminal Trial (Trump guilty on all 34 Counts) (2 Viewers)

[SteveSBrickNJ]

What will happen now that former President Donald Trump was found guilty (in 34 counts) by the jury?
*
Speculation on the judge relating to sentencing?
*
Appeals?
*
Political Damage?
*

Trump found guilty on all 34 counts of falsifying business records. Here's a breakdown.

A New York jury unanimously found Donald Trump guilty of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records, a stunning conclusion to the historic trial of the former president.

www.yahoo.com

 

[efil4]

Oh someone gonna be gagged alright.

What would be awesome is Trump flipping out when he sees her on the stand.

i think he keeps his composure somewhat in the court. Its post court barricade podium and the evening hours/idle time im interested in.

 

[DaveXA]

i think he keeps his composure somewhat in the court. Its post court barricade podium and the evening hours/idle time im interested in.

Yeah, no doubt. I can dream tho. Heh. Stormy making Trump flip out in the courtroom would be too funny.

 

[superchuck500]

they are attempting to connect $12,000 payment by DNC = Underwood filing charges against Trump Foundation ( while Colangalo was deputy DA ) = Colangalo is bought and paid for by Democrats.

Its absolutely crazy to think this $12,000 payment in any way is somehow related to the current proceedings, but for some, its just more proof that this is all orchestrated by Biden/Dems etc. It HAS to be. They know Trump is a criminal, but he is THEIR criminal.

I have known lawyers that work for various government agencies, state and federal. I know for a fact that they are allowed to do outside work, for pay, if they follow their agency's rule for authorization to do it . . . which includes conflicts checks and review under the relevant ethics rules.

Matthew Colangelo, JD Harvard law, assistant White House counsel, Acting Associate Attorney General, Deputy Director of the National Economic Council, and "Distinguished Lecturer" at Georgetown Law didn't take $12,000 from the DNC to secure charges against the Trump Foundation.

Unlike some attorneys we have seen in the past few years who became completely lost in the fog of Trumpism and now find themselves disbarred, under threat of disbarment or serious sanction, or criminally indicted, most lawyers - and I'm not referring to any "side" of the tribal landscape, I truly mean most - with these kinds of distinguished resumes are (1) principled enough to avoid sanctionable behavior and (2) smart enough to avoid serious scrutiny by keeping it clean.

 

[DaveXA]

I have known lawyers that work for various government agencies, state and federal. I know for a fact that they are allowed to do outside work, for pay, if they follow their agency's rule for authorization to do it . . . which includes conflicts checks and review under the relevant ethics rules.

Matthew Colangelo, JD Harvard law, deputy White House counsel, Acting Associate Attorney General, Deputy Director of the National Economic Council, and "Distinguished Lecturer" at Georgetown Law didn't take $12,000 from the DNC to secure charges against the Trump Foundation.

Unlike some attorneys we have seen in the past few years who became completely lost in the fog of Trumpism and now find themselves disbarred, under threat of disbarment or serious sanction, or criminally indicted, most lawyers - and I'm not referring to any "side" of the tribal landscape, I truly mean most - with these kinds of distinguished resumes are (1) principled enough to avoid sanctionable behavior and (2) smart enough to avoid serious scrutiny by keeping it clean.

But, but, SFL said it, so it must be true! Well, technically the tweet he posted, but yeah.

/s

 

[DaveXA]

If you want people to actually take you seriously, do better than this, lol.

 

[J-DONK]

Your hypocrisy makes everyone laugh at these things.

What is your point? Are you of the opinion that public servants shouldn't receive emoluments while in office?

A Trump supporter can't seriously answer yes to that question.

Why are you posting this then?

You should change your username to "Onlywhentheydoit"

 

[MT15]

If you want people to actually take you seriously, do better than this, lol.

No kidding. At least take a minute to think critically about the smear before you post it.

 

[FullMonte]

Okay, if this is true, and Trump attends a campaign event instead of Barton’s graduation, would he be in trouble with the judge?

In all fairness…it appears that Barrons graduation is supposed to be that morning. Figure a few hours, Trump should be able to attend it, hop on his jet, and make it to Minnesota that evening.

 

[coldseat]

In all fairness…it appears that Barrons graduation is supposed to be that morning. Figure a few hours, Trump should be able to attend it, hop on his jet, and make it to Minnesota that evening.

Plus the fundraiser is during the evening on a Friday. They wouldn't be in court regardless.

 

[FullMonte]

I wonder if the defense will do any serious cross examination of Stormy. There is little to gain, and every question they ask risks her saying something that will insult/upset Trump or make him look bad.

 

[DaveXA]

No kidding. At least take a minute to think critically about the smear before you post it.

Think critically? Now you're just being unreasonable.

 

[J-DONK]

In all fairness…it appears that Barrons graduation is supposed to be that morning. Figure a few hours, Trump should be able to attend it, hop on his jet, and make it to Minnesota that evening.

It's hilarious he is coming to Minnesota. A state that hasn't voted for a Republican in over 50 years.

They obviously think RFK is going to pull votes the way the Libertarian/Green party did in 2016. RFK is to conservative for this state though.

 

[LA - L.A.]

It's hilarious he is coming to Minnesota. A state that hasn't voted for a Republican in over 50 years.

They obviously think RFK is going to pull votes the way the Libertarian/Green party did in 2016. RFK is to conservative for this state though.

I friend of mine here in LA is from Duluth. Just a bit a trivia.

 

[fooferdoggie]

I wonder if the defense will do any serious cross examination of Stormy. There is little to gain, and every question they ask risks her saying something that will insult/upset Trump or make him look bad.

you mean by the lawyer that agreed with trump that the gag order stopped him from testifying?

 

[DaveXA]

I friend of mine here in LA is from Duluth. Just a bit a trivia.

My wife's adopted family lived in Duluth/Superior. Twin cities north, heh. My first time there, it was mid March, lake was still frozen over and 2 feet of fresh snow on the ground.

No thank you, lol.

 

[MT15]

In all fairness…it appears that Barrons graduation is supposed to be that morning. Figure a few hours, Trump should be able to attend it, hop on his jet, and make it to Minnesota that evening.

Ok thanks. I couldn’t find any credible time line for the graduation.

 

[superchuck500]

Detailed thread of Stormy’s testimony:

 

[faceman]

It's hilarious he is coming to Minnesota. A state that hasn't voted for a Republican in over 50 years.

They obviously think RFK is going to pull votes the way the Libertarian/Green party did in 2016. RFK is to conservative for this state though.

I had to search out of curiosity after reading this. They voted for Eisenhower in 52 and 56. They also voted Nixon in 72.
They were the only state to vote for Walter Mondell in 1984. You're right. Trump doesn't have a snow balls chance in hell
winning Mn.