Trump Election Interference / Falsification of Business Records Criminal Trial (Trump guilty on all 34 Counts) (4 Viewers)

Thread Attachment browser

Users who are viewing this thread

    Total: 5 (members: 0, guests: 5)
    What will happen now that former President Donald Trump was found guilty (in 34 counts) by the jury?
    *
    Speculation on the judge relating to sentencing?
    *
    Appeals?
    *
    Political Damage?
    *
    www.yahoo.com

    Trump found guilty on all 34 counts of falsifying business records. Here's a breakdown.

    A New York jury unanimously found Donald Trump guilty of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records, a stunning conclusion to the historic trial of the former president.
    www.yahoo.com www.yahoo.com
     
    David Pecker, the former publisher of the National Enquirer, testified at Donald Trump's trial Tuesday that the tabloid completely manufactured a negative story in 2016 about the father of Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, who was then Trump's rival for the GOP presidential nomination.

    The paper had published a photo allegedly showing Cruz's father, Rafael Cruz, with Lee Harvey Oswald, handing out pro-Fidel Castro pamphlets in New Orleans in 1963, not long before Oswald assassinated President John F. Kennedy.

    Trump repeatedly referenced it on the campaign trail and in interviews.

    “I mean, what was he doing — what was he doing with Lee Harvey Oswald shortly before the death? Before the shooting?” Trump said in an interview with Fox News in May 2016. “It’s horrible.”

    Manhattan prosecutor Joshua Steinglass asked Pecker about the story's origins during the trial Tuesday in Manhattan. Pecker said that then-National Enquirer editor-in-chief Dylan Howard and the tabloid's research department got involved, and Pecker indicated that they faked the photo that was the foundation for the story.

    “We mashed the photos and the different picture with Lee Harvey Oswald. And mashed the two together. And that’s how that story was prepared — created I would say," Pecker said on the witness stand.

    Asked by Steinglass whether Cruz had gained popularity in the presidential race at the time, Pecker said, “I believe so.”

    The revelation came up as the prosecution focused on negative articles that were published by the tabloid about Trump's Republican opponents at the time. Pecker explained that it was Michael Cohen, Trump's personal lawyer, that would orchestrate the planting of these stories.

    Pecker said Cohen would call and say they'd like his publication to run an article on a certain candidate, adding that Cohen would then send him a piece about Cruz, for example, and the National Enquirer "would embellish it from there."...........

    MSN

    www.msn.com
     
    Optimus Prime said:
    David Pecker, the former publisher of the National Enquirer, testified at Donald Trump's trial Tuesday that the tabloid completely manufactured a negative story in 2016 about the father of Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, who was then Trump's rival for the GOP presidential nomination.

    The paper had published a photo allegedly showing Cruz's father, Rafael Cruz, with Lee Harvey Oswald, handing out pro-Fidel Castro pamphlets in New Orleans in 1963, not long before Oswald assassinated President John F. Kennedy.

    Trump repeatedly referenced it on the campaign trail and in interviews.

    “I mean, what was he doing — what was he doing with Lee Harvey Oswald shortly before the death? Before the shooting?” Trump said in an interview with Fox News in May 2016. “It’s horrible.”

    Manhattan prosecutor Joshua Steinglass asked Pecker about the story's origins during the trial Tuesday in Manhattan. Pecker said that then-National Enquirer editor-in-chief Dylan Howard and the tabloid's research department got involved, and Pecker indicated that they faked the photo that was the foundation for the story.

    “We mashed the photos and the different picture with Lee Harvey Oswald. And mashed the two together. And that’s how that story was prepared — created I would say," Pecker said on the witness stand.

    Asked by Steinglass whether Cruz had gained popularity in the presidential race at the time, Pecker said, “I believe so.”

    The revelation came up as the prosecution focused on negative articles that were published by the tabloid about Trump's Republican opponents at the time. Pecker explained that it was Michael Cohen, Trump's personal lawyer, that would orchestrate the planting of these stories.

    Pecker said Cohen would call and say they'd like his publication to run an article on a certain candidate, adding that Cohen would then send him a piece about Cruz, for example, and the National Enquirer "would embellish it from there."...........

    MSN

    www.msn.com
    Click to expand...
    Oh, now I see where SFL gets his conspiracy theories from. Nice.
     
    SaintForLife said:
    Micheal Cohen is a witness against Trump in this trial. Which criminals are we supposed to believe? Anyone who is against Trump right?
    Click to expand...
    I think you should weigh the corroborating evidence and also consider who lies the most. Cohen is just an amateur liar compared to Trump.
     
    SaintForLife said:
    Micheal Cohen is a witness against Trump in this trial. Which criminals are we supposed to believe? Anyone who is against Trump right?
    Click to expand...
    Michael Cohen is a criminal because of the exact crimes Donald Trump is on trial for now

    The exact crimes Donald Trump told him to do

    Avanetti is a criminal because he tried to extort Nike for 25 million dollars

    A bit different no?

    Sometimes you have to get a convicted Capone henchman to testify against Al Capone
     
    Optimus Prime said:
    Michael Cohen is a criminal because of the exact crimes Donald Trump is on trial for now

    The exact crimes Donald Trump told him to do

    Avanetti is a criminal because he tried to extort Nike for 25 million dollars

    A bit different no?

    Sometimes you have to get a convicted Capone henchman to testify against Al Capone
    Click to expand...
    A reasonable take? We can't have that here, lol.
     
    SaintForLife said:
    Oh its who lies the most. What a great standard for evaluating witnesses in a trial.
    Click to expand...
    Are you only capable of picking pieces of statements that puts them out of context? Did you note the part about corroboration? I think that's kind of important. I don't think there is any corroboration for your favorite defendant.
     
    SaintForLife said:
    Micheal Cohen is a witness against Trump in this trial. Which criminals are we supposed to believe? Anyone who is against Trump right?
    Click to expand...


    clearly you have no idea how prosecution works. They got receipts, brah.

    which makes this whole ' i believe Avenatti" angle even funnier.
     
    Optimus Prime said:
    Michael Cohen is a criminal because of the exact crimes Donald Trump is on trial for now

    The exact crimes Donald Trump told him to do
    Click to expand...
    Did Trump make him do this?

    apnews.com

    Judge says Michael Cohen may have committed perjury, refuses to end his probation early

    A federal judge has suggested Michael Cohen has committed perjury under oath, giving fresh support to former President Donald Trump's claims that his onetime personal lawyer and star witness at his upcoming criminal trial in New York is an untrustworthy liar.
    apnews.com apnews.com

    What about Cohen's tax evasion scheme with the Taxi medallions?

    What about Cohen's false statement to the bank involving the taxi medallions?

    Neither of those involved Trump and he was found guilty of both.

    Optimus Prime said:
    Avanetti is a criminal because he tried to extort Nike for 25 million dollars

    A bit different no?

    Sometimes you have to get a convicted Capone henchman to testify against Al Capone
    Click to expand...
    Yeah it is different. They are both criminals, but Cohen appears to be the bigger liar.

    It's laughable how yall decide which criminals to believe.

    At least Coldseat admitted that the way to decide which criminal to believe is any criminal who is against Trump.
     

    Create an account or login to comment

    You must be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create account

    Create an account on our community. It's easy!

    Register

    Log in

    Already have an account? Log in here.

    Share this page

    Advertisement

    General News Feed

    Fact Checkers News Feed

    Sponsored

    Back
    Top Bottom