The Trump Cabinet and key post thread (3 Viewers)

[superchuck500]

Surely to be a clown show. We know that RFK certainly thinks he’s getting nominated for HHS, which includes FDA.

 

[MT15]

I didn’t say she was just as disqualified as Trump. Don’t put words in my mouth.

I said I didn’t believe she was fit for or qualified for the office. She either is or she isn’t. It has nothing to do with the qualifications or lack thereof of her opponents. She either has the skills or she doesn’t.

Still a complete dodge. You cannot support your opinion or you don’t want to reveal what you feel makes her unfit.

Unfit is a strong statement. I didn’t agree with Romney’s positions but I would have never said he was unfit for office. I even asserted I would have happily voted for him if he were running against Trump, who is clearly unfit.

You say you feel that Harris is unfit to even be a US Senator let alone President. It should be easy for you to tell us why.

 

[cuddlemonkey]

You obviously disagree with my opinion. Can you support yours?

I haven't made a claim or stated an opinion. Why are you so scared to support yours?

 

[TampaJoe]

Still a complete dodge. You cannot support your opinion or you don’t want to reveal what you feel makes her unfit.

Unfit is a strong statement. I didn’t agree with Romney’s positions but I would have never said he was unfit for office. I even asserted I would have happily voted for him if he were running against Trump, who is clearly unfit.

You say you feel that Harris is unfit to even be a US Senator let alone President. It should be easy for you to tell us why.

I already addressed this earlier. I said that I have seen nothing from her that persuaded me she was qualified or fit for the job. When she ran for the job on her own in 2020, she dropped out of the race without a single delegate. At that time, her own party was unimpressed with her qualifications. I don’t believe that either Pelosi or Obama or Schumer wanted her for the job but were stuck with her by Biden after they kicked him to the curb.

Now you may not agree and are free to tell me what you believe qualifies her to be the leader of the free world.

 

[MT15]

I already addressed this earlier. I said that I have seen nothing from her that persuaded me she was qualified or fit for the job. When she ran for the job on her own in 2020, she dropped out of the race without a single delegate. At that time, her own party was unimpressed with her qualifications. I don’t believe that either Pelosi or Obama or Schumer wanted her for the job but were stuck with her by Biden after they kicked him to the curb.

Now you may not agree and are free to tell me what you believe qualifies her to be the leader of the free world.

Unfit. You said she was unfit to be a US Senator. Nothing you said above speaks to being unfit for the job.

 

[TampaJoe]

Unfit. You said she was unfit to be a US Senator. Nothing you said above speaks to being unfit for the job.

So you would vote for someone who hasn’t demonstrated qualifications or fitness? Interesting.

It’s not up to me to prove she is unfit or unqualified. It’s up to her to demonstrate she is. It is not my case to make. It’s hers and her supporters.

I wouldn’t hire someone who cannot demonstrate fitness and qualifications. This isn’t just any job.

 

[Dragon]

So you would vote for someone who hasn’t demonstrated qualifications or fitness? Interesting.

It’s not up to me to prove she is unfit or unqualified. It’s up to her to demonstrate she is. It is not my case to make. It’s hers and her supporters.

I wouldn’t hire someone who cannot demonstrate fitness and qualifications. This isn’t just any job.

What qualifications do you think she lacks ? You are still not providing any information. If you think that she lacks something you should be able to say what ?

 

[cuddlemonkey]

So you would vote for someone who hasn’t demonstrated qualifications or fitness? Interesting.

It’s not up to me to prove she is unfit or unqualified. It’s up to her to demonstrate she is. It is not my case to make. It’s hers and her supporters.

I wouldn’t hire someone who cannot demonstrate fitness and qualifications. This isn’t just any job.

Yes, it is. You made that exact claim, so it's on you to prove it.

 

[TampaJoe]

What qualifications do you think she lacks ? You are still not providing any information. If you think that she lacks something you should be able to say what ?

If you think she is qualified and worthy of consideration, you should be able to point to her qualifications and accomplishments. Why should I support someone when you can’t explain why? The only reason I’ve heard is that she’s normal and she’s not Trump. That IMO doesn’t qualify her for leader of the free world.

Obviously other voters shared the same concerns. She and Biden were polling behind Trump on most every issue except abortion. When asked what she would do differently, she said “nothing comes to mind”. She isn’t entitled to my vote or anyone’s vote by default. She should have to make a case as to her qualification, fitness and plans for the future. So she failed to make her case.

So tell me, other than getting elected in CA, what qualifies her to be the Leader of the Free World.

 

[Dragon]

That’s not how it works. You claimed she was lacking something—well, if you’re going to make that claim, you should be able to specify what it is. Apparently, though, you’re either unable or unwilling to do so. Perhaps it’s the lack of a 'beard,' as I jokingly mentioned earlier, but you won’t admit that’s the real issue.

 

[TampaJoe]

Yes, it is. You made that exact claim, so it's on you to prove it.

Not really.

Not how voting works. Not how elections work. I am not trying to convince you to vote either way. I am simply saying I found nothing in her or that ticket that convinced me they were either qualified or fit for the job. You are welcome to disagree. You are free to explain why if you choose. Matters not to me.

But a majority of voters disagreed. That’s how elections work. You ask why. Perhaps it’s lies in the fact that her only qualification, or the one her campaign focused on, was that she wasn’t Trump. That didn’t resonate. Despite spending a billion dollar. As I said, both her and Biden polled behind Trump on every major issue except one. You can ignore that if you choose. Up to you. But it’s worth considering that may be one of the reasons for the loss.

 

[TampaJoe]

That’s not how it works. You claimed she was lacking something—well, if you’re going to make that claim, you should be able to specify what it is. Apparently, though, you’re either unable or unwilling to do so. Perhaps it’s the lack of a 'beard,' as I jokingly mentioned earlier, but you won’t admit that’s the real issue.

She lacks the ability to convince me and a majority of voters that she is qualified or fit to be the Leader of the Free World. Probably many things go into that. When you lose a free and fair election, you probably failed to convince enough people that you were the most fit and best qualified to lead the nation. Just a guess.

You doubt me and yet other than her not being Trump, you offer little else.

 

[CoolBrees]

She was the DA San Francisco, the CA Attorney General, a US Senator who was on the Senate Judiciary Committee

Oh, she was the forking Vice President.

The only candidate in history that can match her qualifications was Hillary Clinton.

What more qualifications exist that she doesn't have? Seriously.

Oh I know - Not White. Not Man.