superchuck500
U.S. Blues
Offline
Surely to be a clown show. We know that RFK certainly thinks he’s getting nominated for HHS, which includes FDA.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Isn’t electability a qualification. Isn’t that why they run? To get elected.
Walt the Janitor may meet the constitutional qualifications to run but is he electable? Does he have the skill set to be the leader of the free world. Are we to assume he has that skill set or is it his job to demonstrate to and persuade the voters that he does?
This isn’t just any job. It should be hard to get and we should be getting much better qualified candidates that what we have been getting.
The whole conflating electability with qualifications is the biggest bunch of hogwash I have heard in quite a while.
Let me clue you in on how elections work. Electability is a primary qualification. Ask anyone who has run a campaign.
People who run elections determine electability all the time. In fact the voter determines electability. Do YOU vote for people who have zero chance or little chance of getting elected. I’ll bet donors look at electability.This is circular logic, and makes zero sense. Post-facto declaring some unqualifed after they lose means you don't understand the word.
AOC was a bartender dude. A janitor is qualified to run for president. You need to lookup the meaning of the word.
How do you determine electability before someone runs? The only real answer is polling. Harris was by far the leader there.
The truth is you misspoke and instead of backtracking your penta-downing on this.
My view is the incubment biaspbut Harris at a massive disadvantage. This loss was 99% Biden to me. I can't answer who wins the primary, but if it was Harris. She would have had time to say "I'm not Joe."
whatever floats your boat.Basically, Joe has nothing that points to Harris being unfit to be either a Senator or President.
What a complete waste of time trying to engage with him. He is still saying things about Harris that are simply and completely untrue, even though his mischaracterization was pointed out at least a day ago.
Harris had detailed proposals for her economic positions. Trump is the one who spent all his time demonizing the opposition and lying about what he would do - he changed positions several times on abortion alone.
His demonizations worked, coupled with blaming the current administration for global inflation that they actually handled better than most of the other countries.
I won’t be responding to Joe much anymore. It’s not worth anyone’s time to engage with him IMO. He cannot carry on a forthright discussion.