Moderates that voted for Biden in Virginia are now voting Republican. (3 Viewers)

[Paul]

The middle makes the difference once again. Why?

McAuliffe made an error with the school issue to appease the CRT crowd. A costly strategic error.

Terry McAuliffe’s War on Parents | National Review

Parents know the most about their kids, care the most about their kids, and should have a say in their education.

www.nationalreview.com

On another note CNN described Michelle Wu a moderate as the first woman of color to be mayor. The media recruiting minorities.

 

[Paul]

You act like all racists wear their hoods when they are shopping for groceries.

Even at the height of lynching's in the US, KKK members didn't wear their hoods to church, or in town. That was the whole point of their hoods, they were cowards.

There are plenty of white supremacists who interact with black people every day without burning crosses in their yards. Some of them even pretend to be centrists warning us about tribalism.

The more things change, the more they stay the same.

It is low class to use the R word in a argumjent.

 

[Paul]

I don't mind being judged by Paul.

I don't judge you. I just reply to the words I see on the screen. When I reply I leave personal attacks or ad hominem out. I simply try to discuss the point. You should try and do the same.

 

[samiam5211]

It is low class to use the R word in a argumjent.

It's ok, i'm white trash born and raised.

I don't pretend to be high class.

 

[Paul]

It's ok, i'm white trash born and raised.

I don't pretend to be high class.

I did not say you are low class. I said that using the R word in an argument is low class, That can apply to Price Charles for all I care. Debate the words on the screen instead of calling people names. No need to be angry at anyone that has a different opinion.

“He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them. But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side, if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion.."

John Stuart Mill

 

[samiam5211]

I did not say you are low class. I said that using the R word in an argument is low class, That can apply to Price Charles for all I care. Debate the words on the screen instead of calling people names. No need to be angry at anyone that has a different opinion.

“He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them. But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side, if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion.."

John Stuart Mill

It's not the R word, it's racist. The R word is something else.

Racist isn't a slur, and it is not profane.

 

[Paul]

It's not the R word, it's racist. The R word is something else.

Racist isn't a slur, and it is not profane.

 

[cuddlemonkey]

It's not the R word, it's racist. The R word is something else.

Racist isn't a slur, and it is not profane.

Exactly. The actual R word is a word he used the other day, which is far more offensive than accurately pointing out examples of racism and racist behavior.

 

[cuddlemonkey]

You've demonstrated that you don't know the difference between an argument and an assessment of someone's words. I am willing to bet that your ability to determine the winner of something you can't even recognize is suspect at best.

 

[Paul]

You've demonstrated that you don't know the difference between an argument and an assessment of someone's words. I am willing to bet that your ability to determine the winner of something you can't even recognize is suspect at best.

Why the personal attacks? If I say something that is wrong you are free to correct what i said without using insulting remarks. If my assessment is wrong then I suggest you provide your assessment and prove why you are correct. Note, how I never include personal attacks on my posts to you CM. I only deal with what you write. BTW, when you write something that is awesome I always let you now.

 

[cuddlemonkey]

Why the personal attacks? If I say something that is wrong you are free to correct what i said without using insulting remarks. If my assessment is wrong then I suggest you provide your assessment and prove why you are correct. Note, how I never include personal attacks on my posts to you CM. I only deal with what you write. BTW, when you write something that is awesome I always let you now.

Thanks for the permission. Now we can say that you also don't know the difference between a personal attack and an assessment of someone's words.

I have shown you on multiple occasions where you have misconstrued an assessment for an argument. You have chosen not to listen, though. You did the same thing when you said that you don't say racist things and we should call it out when we think you do. I did just that. We have a multiple-page private conversation on the subject. My takeaway from that conversation, as well as many exchanges on this board, is that you lack the ability to take criticism or engage in any self-reflection.

 

[Paul]

Thanks for the permission. Now we can say that you also don't know the difference between a personal attack and an assessment of someone's words.

I have shown you on multiple occasions where you have misconstrued an assessment for an argument. You have chosen not to listen, though. You did the same thing when you said that you don't say racist things and we should call it out when we think you do. I did just that. We have a multiple-page private conversation on the subject. My takeaway from that conversation, as well as many exchanges on this board, is that you lack the ability to take criticism or engage in any self-reflection.

CM

Your post is 100% about me as a person.
Note, how I leave what I think of you as a person out of the conversation.

 

[cuddlemonkey]

CM

Your post is 100% about me as a person.
Note, how I leave what I think of you as a person out of the conversation.

Yes. It's possible to make a post about somebody and not have it be a personal attack. Do you genuinely not see the difference between those two things?

 

[Paul]

Yes. It's possible to make a post about somebody and not have it be a personal attack. Do you genuinely not see the difference between those two things?

Ideally the exchanges should be about issue. I admit that any poster can make assumptions about the personality of others, but most of the time those assumptions will be wrong.

 

[cuddlemonkey]

Ideally the exchanges should be about issue. I admit that any poster can make assumptions about the personality of others, but most of the time those assumptions will be wrong.

I have been posting about the issue, though. The issue at hand is your inability to understand simple concepts necessary to have an adult conversation.

 

[J-DONK]

I have been posting about the issue, though. The issue at hand is your inability to understand simple concepts necessary to have an adult conversation.

He is a very obvious conservative troll.

Look at this thread, he started it with a lie.

His premise was Terry McAuliffe lost because of CRT, and he was to progressive. Terry McAuliffe is not progressive.

Michelle Wu won because she is a moderate. Michelle Wu ran on a city sized green new deal. She is much father left of Terry.

He is a moderate independent that in his ideal world democrats wouldn't exist.

He knows enough to mischaracterize the candidates to fit his worldview, and try to create a narrative. He isn't dumb, just a troll.

 

[Paul]

He is a very obvious conservative troll.

Look at this thread, he started it with a lie.

His premise was Terry McAuliffe lost because of CRT, and he was to progressive. Terry McAuliffe is not progressive.

Michelle Wu won because she is a moderate. Michelle Wu ran on a city sized green new deal. She is much father left of Terry.

He is a moderate independent that in his ideal world democrats wouldn't exist.

He knows enough to mischaracterize the candidates to fit his worldview, and try to create a narrative. He isn't dumb, just a troll.

Another personal insult.
I will not insult you back.

McAuliffe lost because he said parents have no input in the education of their children.
Michelle Wu who is not a POC is to the right of AOC.

 

[J-DONK]

Another personal insult.
I will not insult you back.

McAuliffe lost because he said parents have no inout in the education of their children.
Michelle Wu who is not a POC is to the right of AOC.

You're not translating to English correctly, Paul. It's input, not inout. A native English speaker would never make that mistake.

Seriously though you said McAuliffe was progressive.

I don't think AOC is the litmus test on if you are a progressive. You can be to the right of AOC and still be called a progressive. She ran on rent control, and a green new deal.

 

[Paul]

You're not translating to English correctly, Paul. It's input, not inout.

Thanks, I fixed it. It was a typo. The p is next to the o in the keyboard.