Justice Breyer reportedly to retire (1 Viewer)

Users who are viewing this thread

coldseat

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 30, 2019
Messages
2,258
Reaction score
3,645
Age
47
Location
San Antonio
Offline
An early list of judges that are being discussed as possible replacements:

DC Circuit Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson
1643228780891.png


California Supreme Court Justice Leondra Kruger
1643228813754.png


South Carolina US District Court Judge J. Michelle Childs
1643228859320.png


Sherrilyn Ifill
1643228922277.png


Anita Earls

1643228968923.png



 

coldseat

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 30, 2019
Messages
2,258
Reaction score
3,645
Age
47
Location
San Antonio
Offline
District Judge Wilhelmina "Mimi" Wright
1643229083785.png


Circuit Judge Eunice Lee
1643229128273.png


Circuit Judge Candace Jackson-Akiwumi
1643229162416.png
 

GrandAdmiral

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2019
Messages
2,492
Reaction score
3,290
Location
Center of the Universe
Offline
District Judge Wilhelmina "Mimi" Wright
1643229083785.png


Circuit Judge Eunice Lee
1643229128273.png


Circuit Judge Candace Jackson-Akiwumi
1643229162416.png
Gotta give a nope to all three of these potentials. As was mentioned earlier, he needs to nominate someone who has a few decades to give.

I really wish Michelle had an interest in sitting on the bench. I would nominate her in a heartbeat.
 

J-DONK

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 28, 2019
Messages
860
Reaction score
1,156
Age
43
Location
Minnesota
Offline
Gotta give a nope to all three of these potentials. As was mentioned earlier, he needs to nominate someone who has a few decades to give.

I really wish Michelle had an interest in sitting on the bench. I would nominate her in a heartbeat.

Kruger is 45.
 

MT15

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 13, 2019
Messages
10,933
Reaction score
15,941
Location
Midwest
Offline
The question is: can the GOP stall the nomination for 3 years? :hihi:
They could and would if they were in the majority in the Senate. But they’re not so they can’t.

ETA: Old Mitch already has stated that if he is the majority leader, no Biden nominations to the Supreme Court would be advanced. No matter how long until the election. We already saw that the length of time until the election means nothing to Rs with Barrett.
 

wardorican

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 14, 2019
Messages
3,846
Reaction score
4,344
Age
42
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Offline
 

MT15

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 13, 2019
Messages
10,933
Reaction score
15,941
Location
Midwest
Offline
It’s being said on tv that Clyburn is throwing his weight behind Childs, which makes sense since she is from South Carolina.
 

bdb13

Well-known member
Joined
May 17, 2019
Messages
1,696
Reaction score
2,709
Location
Pensacola, FL
Offline
And unless he really goes rogue here and chooses to screw Biden and the rest of the Democratic party (which is not going to happen, at least to an extent that would prevent Biden from placing someone on the Court), here's a prime situation where it pays dividends to still have Manchin in the Senate as a Democrat.

What happened: Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) said he's open to supporting President Joe Biden's nominee to the Supreme Court, even if the pick is more ideologically liberal than he is.

"Whoever he puts up will have experience and we'll be able to judge them off of that. But as far as just the philosophical beliefs, no, that will not prohibit me from supporting somebody."

Democrats can exhale: It's always good to get these things stated publicly but — as we noted yesterday — this shouldn't really be a big surprise. Manchin and fellow centrist Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.) have supported Biden's judicial picks this year ... unlike other parts of his agenda.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Advertisement

General News Feed

Fact Checkers News Feed

Sponsored

Top Bottom