Biden Tracker (3 Viewers)

Users who are viewing this thread

    Even though the Hur decided not to bring charges against Biden, that report reads like a political hit job. He went out of his way to make Biden appear old, addled and senile as far back as 2017. It almost seemed personal to Hur.
     
    Even though the Hur decided not to bring charges against Biden, that report reads like a political hit job. He went out of his way to make Biden appear old, addled and senile as far back as 2017. It almost seemed personal to Hur.
    Exactly!

    Not only that, from the parts of the report that is highlighted in the article, it appears that he's equating Biden's actions with Trump's.
     
    Ok, but then there's this lil nugget:

    Really?
    Yeah, that report is disgracefully partisan. He should have to go to the Senate and answer some pointed questions about it. It is totally unprofessional in almost every way.

    For example, he starts off saying that Biden willfully retained classified documents and then buried on page 215 he says there isn’t evidence to support that.

     
    Everybody who speaks in front of people make this sort of mistake. It doesn’t have anything to do with age.

     


    Edit more:


    Lol.

    And I just got home and caught part of biden's press conf. Just a note, tom we re gonna get an sfl post on Biden mixing Egypt w mexico. I rolled my eyes knowing the right wing ecosystem will play that over and over tom.

     
    Last edited:
    It's a choice we don't have to.


    Dude, really? I had completely forgotten about our exchange and you. I was not thinking or talking about you at all, and now for a little good-natured ribbing...


    I love that song. It's apropos to your post, with the irony and all. Freudian maybe, but I dont believe in psychoanalysis. Eh.

    🫡
     


    This was what I was thinking when news broke of his classified docs. Notes and memos he took from diplomatic missions.
     
    My take on that part. If my choices are:
    a) A man who struggles to remember some details about things that happened several years ago, but who was "well meaning" when he had documents stored at his home.
    --or--
    b) A man who intentionally, and knowingly, refused to return documents for a year and a half, ignored a subpoena for those documents, lied to the courts about those documents, obstructed efforts to retrieve those documents, and instructed others to lie about those documents.

    The choice seems pretty clear to me.
    If you aren’t throwing that test in the trash (for providing you two bad answers) then I’m not so sure you know what the clear choice is.
     
    Yeah, this was a good quip.


    Republicans are grasping at straws. They anticipated a terrible economy, but that didn't materialize. They now fabricated an immigration crisis, and we see how much they care. (Illegal immigration has been fallen since 2007). They fabricated an impeachment investigation and that showed their incompetence. What's left is the guy is old and senile, despite managing two serious international crisis and averted a third in Taiwan by flexing 2 carrier fleets there. Oh right, he passed 3 major legislations with razor thin majorities in both chambers. Yeah, so senile he accomplished that much.
     

    Create an account or login to comment

    You must be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create account

    Create an account on our community. It's easy!

    Log in

    Already have an account? Log in here.

    General News Feed

    Fact Checkers News Feed

    Back
    Top Bottom