Search results for query: *

Yeah, I think what's ultimately going to happen is a suspended sentence. It doesn't affect him being convicted so that will still stand.

I think it's more about two things, one the long standing push to focus on getting kids to pass tests instead of teaching critical thinking. That's more of a political and administrative problem than a teacher problem, and this approach really handcuffs teachers' ability to teach kids. Two...

Agreed.

It's probably gonna get dismissed. Can't see them sitting on this for 4+ years.

Maybe things have changed but growing up, and having a lot of experience in both private and public school settings, the theomythology isn't accurate...at all. Not only that, my kids went to both public and private schools over the years and the core curriculum really wasn't all that different...

They don't care that he's a liar...at all.

Oh no question.

About the only sane thing I've ever heard from Rand Paul.

They should postpone it until he's no longer President. He can't pardon himself and he'd have to serve the sentence after.That said, it ain't happening.I'll be shocked if he survives another 4 years anyway.

Once they line his pockets...not so much.

His analogy is a poor one and doesn't really lay out what the actual choices are. But eh, nothing gonna convince him otherwise.

You chose to sit out. That's a choice whether you like it or not. But yes, the choice was clear and to characterize as anything else is disingenuous. There was a clear better option between the two choices. Sitting out was a cop out.

Eh, doing whatever you want to do doesn't take any courage at all. It's actually the easiest option and path of least resistance. :shrug:

Trump...change his perspective? Good luck with that Pence.

Nice admission that those voting for the p grabber in chief-elect lack critical thinking skills. I didn't think the majority of the population in our country are ill-informed, but here we are.

Maybe, but that won’t stop them from trying.

You pointing to others saying they do the same thing is the definition of making excuses. Don't care what anyone else did. Trump is the person we're discussing, not anyone else.

I don't give a sheet what he was convicted of. I believe the woman who accused him. She sued him for defamation and won and the jury proceeded based on the assumption that what the woman accused him of was true. That's good enough for me.He's a pervert, admitted on tape that he grabs women by...

That you're making excuses for who will become the p*ssy grabber in chief says all I need to know.As for what their strategy should be, I don't know and don't really care. I'm not a Democrat.

In what world is sexual assault a politically motivated thing? Trump has a long, well-known history of being a pervert. I just don't get how anyone can rationalize this into something less than it actually was. Weinstien, P Diddy, Epstien, Cosby and powerful men like them got away with so much...