Justice Breyer reportedly to retire (1 Viewer)

[superchuck500]

 

[SFIDC3]

And unless he really goes rogue here and chooses to screw Biden and the rest of the Democratic party

You mean the same thing he has been doing the last 6 months or so? I don't trust Manchin....at all.....

 

[bdb13]

You mean the same thing he has been doing the last 6 months or so? I don't trust Manchin....at all.....

I'm not surprised that he didn't support BBB or the voting rights bill. I will be surprised if he and Sinema prevent Biden from having a nominee confirmed to the Supreme Court.

 

[SFIDC3]

I'm not surprised that he didn't support BBB or the voting rights bill. I will be surprised if he and Sinema prevent Biden from having a nominee confirmed to the Supreme Court.

He was disingenuous at best, feigning support and then withdrawing it...F him, he is not really a Democrat anyways.....I hope the good folks in WV who could have benefitted by BBB see this....

 

[bdb13]

He was disingenuous at best, feigning support and then withdrawing it...F him, he is not really a Democrat anyways.....I hope the good folks in WV who could have benefitted by BBB see this....

Disingenuous is correct I'd say.. he should have just said and consistently stuck to "I'm not voting for this bill, start over" and I don't really understand why he didn't do that except for maybe feeling pressure from his left or something, which doesn't even forking matter with him being in West Virginia.. so I dunno.

Instead he got himself involved with playing a game with Biden, Klein, and the rest and ended up talking out of both sides of his mouth.

 

[MT15]

To be fair, both Manchin and Sinema have voted to confirm every single judge that Biden has nominated. I don’t think they will change now.

 

[the annoying thing]

Thank god!

I hope he moves back to canada

 

[SaulGoodmanEsq]

I hope he moves back to canada

Is this another bot because that makes no sense.

 

[the annoying thing]

Is this another bot because that makes no sense.

I'm not a bot lol I'm the annoying thing

 

[SaulGoodmanEsq]

Those two concepts aren't mutually exclusive.

 

[the annoying thing]

Those two concepts aren't mutually exclusive.

And your point is ?

 

[H B Lowrey]

They could and would if they were in the majority in the Senate. But they’re not so they can’t.

ETA: Old Mitch already has stated that if he is the majority leader, no Biden nominations to the Supreme Court would be advanced. No matter how long until the election. We already saw that the length of time until the election means nothing to Rs with Barrett.

One really cannot say he or she lives in a representative democracy when one lone confederate senator can cockblock an entire nation.

 

[SamAndreas]

One really cannot say he or she lives in a representative democracy when one lone confederate senator can cockblock an entire nation.

He's a Snapping Turtle. Keep your hands out of reach or you'll loose a finger.

 

[zztop]

read this it of info:

Since 1789, U.S. presidents have submitted 163 Supreme Court nominations. Out of 114 justices who have served, 108 of those have been white men. It would not be until 1967 that Thurgood Marshall would become the first Black man nominated and confirmed to a seat on the high court. In 1981, Sandra Day O’Connor became the first woman justice

 

[H B Lowrey]

read this it of info:

Since 1789, U.S. presidents have submitted 163 Supreme Court nominations. Out of 114 justices who have served, 108 of those have been white men. It would not be until 1967 that Thurgood Marshall would become the first Black man nominated and confirmed to a seat on the high court. In 1981, Sandra Day O’Connor became the first woman justice

So the hissyfitters should be ok with a black woman not. Everything was done nice and easy so as not to offend them, and it was even done in the "proper" order so as not to be too disruptive to their fragility.

 

[samiam5211]

There are thousands of Judges who are able to interpret the constitution well enough to be on the SCOTUS.

“Best” qualified usually means that the judge has the same biases as the person defining “best”.

Like it or not, SCOTUS nominations are a political act, even if the position is not supposed to be.

Including factors like diversity don’t undermine the court any more than promising to appoint an “originalist”.

Narrowing down the pool of candidates by race and gender doesn’t hurt, and if it helps the court better reflect the population it affects, it’s probably the better than any other metric that has been used.

 

[MT15]

The really crazy thing is that Trump promised to only nominate people who would overturn Roe, which is the opposite of what most people in the country want, and nobody said a peep about him doing that. Like, why did he artificially limit his choices?

 

[zztop]

Biden to nominate Ketanji Brown Jackson for the Supreme Court

Who is Ketanji Brown Jackson?

President Biden’s Supreme Court nominee is a conventionally qualified judge with a strong background in criminal justice reform.

www.vox.com

 

[insidejob]

Biden to nominate Ketanji Brown Jackson for the Supreme Court

Who is Ketanji Brown Jackson?

President Biden’s Supreme Court nominee is a conventionally qualified judge with a strong background in criminal justice reform.

www.vox.com

I just saw a short piece on her history and she seems to be more than qualified. She even clerked for Bryer so it's almost like filling his seat with one of his protégés. I'd actually be shocked if Breyer wasn't consulted or at least had some input on her being ultimately picked.