What happens to the Democratic Party now? (2 Viewers)

[Heathen]

I’m sure much of us are having 2016 flashbacks this morning with a sick feeling to our stomachs..

2 of the last 3 elections Democrats have lost to a far right demagogue

Harris didn’t get close in many states to even Biden’s performance. We could very well lose the Presidency, Senate AND House depending on results the next few days…..

What went wrong?
What could’ve been done better?
What can we change in the future to ensure voters are motivated like they were when Obama was elected?

Democrats have no choice but to admit there’s a huge problem with some aspect of their platform— and to do a deep introspection of what’s going wrong..

 

[Infoman]

I’d vote for Josh Shapiro…. So I expect him to be ignored just like he was as a VP pick.

 

[DaveXA]

I said I don’t support him. I’m not gonna get all worked up about it. People will still get their vaccines. And he could be a pain to drug and healthcare companies.

Once they line his pockets...not so much.

 

[coldseat]

I’d vote for Josh Shapiro…. So I expect him to be ignored just like he was as a VP pick.

He was in the final 2 for the pick.

 

[Optimus Prime]

He was in the final 2 for the pick.

Word is he was way too ambitious and wanted much more say than a VP should (during a campaign and administration)

He definitely has eyes on 2028

 

[Saint by the Bay]

Trump’s total share of the popular vote has dropped beloew 50%

In 4 battleground states the Democrat won the Senate with roughly the same amount of votes as Kamala while Trump won the state by a comfortable margin. That means people were voting Trump and NOTHING else. People took the time to vote for Trump and leave the rest of the ticket blank.

Once again, the Democrats should look at their messaging and their candidates, but not grossly overreact. This Trump thing is a unique phenomenon in American politics and is unlikely to ever be repeated again. It took us 250 years for this to happen once. You can see by how his cabinet appointments are being derided for THE SAME STUFF TRUMP DOES. Whatever magic it is he has isn't transferrable. He has no coat tails. Cult leaders never do.

Everyone needs to take a deep breath, relax, and take a good look at the data. Its not as bad as it feels.

 

[UncleTrvlingJim]

Trump’s total share of the popular vote has dropped beloew 50%

In 4 battleground states the Democrat won the Senate with roughly the same amount of votes as Kamala while Trump won the state by a comfortable margin. That means people were voting Trump and NOTHING else. People took the time to vote for Trump and leave the rest of the ticket blank.

Once again, the Democrats should look at their messaging and their candidates, but not grossly overreact. This Trump thing is a unique phenomenon in American politics and is unlikely to ever be repeated again. It took us 250 years for this to happen once. You can see by how his cabinet appointments are being derided for THE SAME STUFF TRUMP DOES. Whatever magic it is he has isn't transferrable. He has no coat tails. Cult leaders never do.

Everyone needs to take a deep breath, relax, and take a good look at the data. Its not as bad as it feels.

I think people are way overthinking this. Trump is just weird - the grip he has on his supporters. I'm not sure it's repeatable.

Also, inflation was real - and the Democrats did not do a good job messaging on that. And Immigration was a hot button issue that they were on the wrong side of for the first 2+ years of the Biden admin. They switched positions, but it was too late.

That was pretty much it -- immigration and the economy.

If they want to win in the future - focus on the economy. Talk about it relentlessly and outline their vision for it and how it will work.

 

[UncleTrvlingJim]

Also, this was another close election and Trump finished with less than 50% of the vote... and at the moment he's acting like he has a sweeping mandate. There's a good chance he's going to overstep (which a number of his cabinet nominations suggest that he's going to overstep)... which means he'll flame out quickly. The Democrats will need to have a clear alternative and vision for the future of the country, and they can repeat 1986 (where they took back the House and the Senate after Reagan crushed Mondale in 1984)

 

[coldseat]

I think people are way overthinking this. Trump is just weird - the grip he has on his supporters. I'm not sure it's repeatable.

Also, inflation was real - and the Democrats did not do a good job messaging on that. And Immigration was a hot button issue that they were on the wrong side of for the first 2+ years of the Biden admin. They switched positions, but it was too late.

That was pretty much it -- immigration and the economy.

If they want to win in the future - focus on the economy. Talk about it relentlessly and outline their vision for it and how it will work.

On the economy, Democrats need to hammer the message home that "Republicans always crash the economy" and can't be trusted with it. They need to start that now and say over and over again that, "Every Republican president crashes the economy." State it like that fact that it is. "Republicans always increase the deficit." Repeat it over and over until it gets through the thick skull of this electorate and they stop reflectively believing that Republicans are always better for the economy.

 

[UncleTrvlingJim]

On the economy, Democrats need to hammer the message home that "Republicans always crash the economy" and can't be trusted with it. They need to start that now and say over and over again that, "Every Republican president crashes the economy." State it like that fact that it is. "Republicans always increase the deficit." Repeat it over and over until it gets through the thick skull of this electorate and they stop reflectively believing that Republicans are always better for the economy.

I completely agree. They need to do a better job claiming this issue. They have objective facts on their side from a reductive standpoint... and I think they can make a compelling argument on economic theory.

I'm not even a super fan of Democratic economic policy - I just think it's better than what has been Republican policy.

 

[Saint by the Bay]

Part of it is where they deliver the message. They need to get on the everyman airwaves that the people they need to reach listen to.

I think it was a mistake not to do Rogan. Yes, he has the intellectually ability of a cactus plant, but he has a wider audience than every news network combined. Heck, if I were Kamala I would have been there as soon as my policy positions were nailed down. It would have been the first and last stop of my campaign.

I know she took one trip to Fox News, but thats not where the rubber meets the road anymore. Take the message about how poorly Republicans handle the economy to common man media and repeat it over and over for the next 4 years. Anyone who wants to run for President in 28 should be making that circuit starting now.

Clinton was masterful about this. It was part of the reason he had Trump like political invulnerability.

 

[J-DONK]

I think people are way overthinking this. Trump is just weird - the grip he has on his supporters. I'm not sure it's repeatable.

Also, inflation was real - and the Democrats did not do a good job messaging on that. And Immigration was a hot button issue that they were on the wrong side of for the first 2+ years of the Biden admin. They switched positions, but it was too late.

That was pretty much it -- immigration and the economy.

If they want to win in the future - focus on the economy. Talk about it relentlessly and outline their vision for it and how it will work.

I think one of the biggest screwups looking back was letting the parliamentarian say no on the minimum wage increase.

When the same happened to Republicans. They just fired the guy and got a new one.

 

[J-DONK]

Part of it is where they deliver the message. They need to get on the everyman airwaves that the people they need to reach listen to.

I think it was a mistake not to do Rogan. Yes, he has the intellectually ability of a cactus plant, but he has a wider audience than every news network combined. Heck, if I were Kamala I would have been there as soon as my policy positions were nailed down. It would have been the first and last stop of my campaign.

I know she took one trip to Fox News, but thats not where the rubber meets the road anymore. Take the message about how poorly Republicans handle the economy to common man media and repeat it over and over for the next 4 years. Anyone who wants to run for President in 28 should be making that circuit starting now.

Clinton was masterful about this. It was part of the reason he had Trump like political invulnerability.

I listened to a lot of Ezra Klein post election loss.

He made a great point about all of that. If you think Kamala should have done Rogan or not doesn't matter. What does it say about the party when we were comfortable with the Cheney's but not Joe Rogan? Why are we excluding people like him, but including them?

 

[Heathen]

Newsom, Shapiro, and Buttigieg have the best debate chops. They would have to be the frontrunners. AOC might run to represent the progressive wing? Warren/Sanders are far to old.

I’ve heard Andy Bashear’s name mentioned as well

Also I’d be 1000% excited to vote for Jon Stewart if he ever ran, but it’s not going to happen.

 

[Heathen]

Also, this was another close election and Trump finished with less than 50% of the vote... and at the moment he's acting like he has a sweeping mandate. There's a good chance he's going to overstep (which a number of his cabinet nominations suggest that he's going to overstep)... which means he'll flame out quickly. The Democrats will need to have a clear alternative and vision for the future of the country, and they can repeat 1986 (where they took back the House and the Senate after Reagan crushed Mondale in 1984)

Agree

Democrats can’t be the party of upholding the status quo. They absolutely must be the party of the working class. This election shouldn’t have been close.

 

[Optimus Prime]

Maryland governor Wes Moore had been mentioned

 

[Poppy]

I think people are way overthinking this. Trump is just weird - the grip he has on his supporters. I'm not sure it's repeatable.

Also, inflation was real - and the Democrats did not do a good job messaging on that. And Immigration was a hot button issue that they were on the wrong side of for the first 2+ years of the Biden admin. They switched positions, but it was too late.

That was pretty much it -- immigration and the economy.

If they want to win in the future - focus on the economy. Talk about it relentlessly and outline their vision for it and how it will work.

Immigration was the key factor for me. Yes, the economy is poor. goods have tripled in price since Biden. But, the benefits given to illegal immigrants was the point of no return for me. The lack of money that goes to our citizens, and to watch medical benefits, housing benefits, etc go to illegall immigrants is sickening. There is an 1990's video of trump on Oprah. He's saying the exact same things he says now. Everyone loved Trump before he ran for president. Now, he's a nazi. Laughable. It's refreshing to see a lot of the country see through that type of talk about Trump.

 

[RobF]

There is an 1990's video of trump on Oprah. He's saying the exact same things he says now. Everyone loved Trump before he ran for president. Now, he's a nazi. Laughable. It's refreshing to see a lot of the country see through that type of talk about Trump.

Trump said, "They're poisoning the blood of our country," on Oprah??

 

[Booker]

But, the benefits given to illegal immigrants was the point of no return for me.

What benefits would those be?

Explainer: Immigrants and the Use of Public Benefits in the United States

Other than refugees, noncitizens in the United States face significant restrictions on access to federally funded public benefits, including programs such as Medicaid, food stamps, and cash assistance programs. This is particularly the case for unauthorized immigrants, who except in very limited...

www.migrationpolicy.org

Other than refugees, noncitizens living in the United States face significant restrictions on access to public benefits funded by the federal government, including programs such as Medicaid, food stamps (the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program), and cash assistance programs such as Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF). This is particularly the case for unauthorized immigrants, who except in very limited circumstances are barred from all federally funded public benefits. Immigrants on temporary visas, such as international students or seasonal workers, are likewise barred. Even most legal permanent residents (aka green-card holders) face a five-year waiting period before they can qualify for federal benefits. These restrictions are longstanding, in many cases dating back to a 1996 federal welfare reform law.