www.courtlistener.com
Why would the government negotiate an non prosecution agreement with him and then keep it hidden? Also:
Why would the government negotiate an non prosecution agreement with him and then keep it hidden? Also:
The report says that Alexander Acosta, a former U.S. attorney in Miami, told interviewers in the Trump transition team that he was told to back off of Epstein at the time because Epstein “belonged to intelligence.” The Daily Beast reports:
Is the Epstein case going to cause a problem [for confirmation hearings]?” Acosta had been asked. Acosta had explained, breezily, apparently, that back in the day he’d had just one meeting on the Epstein case. He’d cut the non-prosecution deal with one of Epstein’s attorneys because he had “been told” to back off, that Epstein was above his pay grade. “I was told Epstein ‘belonged to intelligence’ and to leave it alone,” he told his interviewers in the Trump transition, who evidently thought that was a sufficient answer and went ahead and hired Acosta. (The Labor Department had no comment when asked about this.)Acosta Was Told Epstein ‘Belonged To Intelligence,’ ‘Leave It Alone,’ Report Says
A new report from The Daily Beast shed light on a potential reason that alleged pedophile Jeffrey Epstein was given the deal of a lifetime when he was convicted on child prostitution charges in 2008. The report says that Alexander Acosta, a former U.S. attorney in Miami, told interviewers in the...www.dailywire.com
So you’re basing this claim entirely on the word of one man, Acosta, who is desperately trying to shift blame from himself for the extremely bad look of him giving Epstein a corrupt sweetheart deal, when he knew more than anybody else at the time what Epstein was guilty of?Why would the government negotiate an non prosecution agreement with him and then keep it hidden? Also:
The report says that Alexander Acosta, a former U.S. attorney in Miami, told interviewers in the Trump transition team that he was told to back off of Epstein at the time because Epstein “belonged to intelligence.” The Daily Beast reports:
Is the Epstein case going to cause a problem [for confirmation hearings]?” Acosta had been asked. Acosta had explained, breezily, apparently, that back in the day he’d had just one meeting on the Epstein case. He’d cut the non-prosecution deal with one of Epstein’s attorneys because he had “been told” to back off, that Epstein was above his pay grade. “I was told Epstein ‘belonged to intelligence’ and to leave it alone,” he told his interviewers in the Trump transition, who evidently thought that was a sufficient answer and went ahead and hired Acosta. (The Labor Department had no comment when asked about this.)Acosta Was Told Epstein ‘Belonged To Intelligence,’ ‘Leave It Alone,’ Report Says
A new report from The Daily Beast shed light on a potential reason that alleged pedophile Jeffrey Epstein was given the deal of a lifetime when he was convicted on child prostitution charges in 2008. The report says that Alexander Acosta, a former U.S. attorney in Miami, told interviewers in the...
The Daily Beast is a scandal site?
It's satire
I’m glad you know it, did you know it was when you posted it? What was the purpose of posting it? It’s bad satire.
Yeah I knew it was satire, but it sounds like you didn't.
Create an account or login to comment
You must be a member in order to leave a comment
Create account
Create an account on our community. It's easy!
Log in
Already have an account? Log in here.
