Intensesaint
Well-known member
Offline
A place for all the gaffs, slip-ups and overall outlandish things Democratic candidates will say or do in lead up to the 2020 Election.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why should taxpayers be on the hook to pay for loans to private universities - the schools that are the most ridiculously overpriced?
Or is Warren, and perhaps others, arguing that the loans just be defaulted and never paid back?
I can see changing the rules and allowing school loans to be eligible for discharge in bankruptcy.
Perhaps I could see some sort of loan forgiveness for public institutions (absent some sort of action - we already have loan forgiveness programs in place if the debtor agrees to certain types of jobs). But not taxpayer-funded bailout of loans that went to private institutions.
Was this thought through?
https://www.chicagotribune.com/poli...0200128-4ixec2ednvgbrlxpfekwnzxi4u-story.html
Sorry, your claims that CNN just likes shiny things and sensationalism doesn't really hold any water after all we've see from CNN this past year.I don't know if I'd call it fixed. They just can't help themselves. They love shiny things. They love drama. They wanted to see these mild mannered nice people fight. It's all about ratings and money.
Do you notice how the Democrats never mention the Universities huge costs and how they are ripping their students off? It's only about forgiving the debt. How about looking at the root problem otherwise we would be back in this same situation in 20 years assuming all the debt was forgiven. They will never talk about how Universities shouldn't be charging as much as they do because they are big Democrat supporters.Why should taxpayers be on the hook to pay for loans to private universities - the schools that are the most ridiculously overpriced?
Or is Warren, and perhaps others, arguing that the loans just be defaulted and never paid back?
I can see changing the rules and allowing school loans to be eligible for discharge in bankruptcy.
Perhaps I could see some sort of loan forgiveness for public institutions (absent some sort of action - we already have loan forgiveness programs in place if the debtor agrees to certain types of jobs). But not taxpayer-funded bailout of loans that went to private institutions.
Do you notice how the Democrats never mention the Universities huge costs and how they are ripping their students off? It's only about forgiving the debt. How about looking at the root problem otherwise we would be back in this same situation in 20 years assuming all the debt was forgiven. They will never talk about how Universities shouldn't be charging as much as they do because they are big Democrat supporters.
Well, to be fair, I don't watch CNN. I don't have cable.Sorry, your claims that CNN just likes shiny things and sensationalism doesn't really hold any water after all we've see from CNN this past year.
Yes, I'm not sure any have been that blunt.Do you notice how the Democrats never mention the Universities huge costs and how they are ripping their students off? It's only about forgiving the debt. How about looking at the root problem otherwise we would be back in this same situation in 20 years assuming all the debt was forgiven. They will never talk about how Universities shouldn't be charging as much as they do because they are big Democrat supporters.
The Plan
Buttigieg would spend $500 million to make college affordable for working and middle class families. Public college students from families that earn up to $100,000 would not pay any tuition at either two or four year public colleges. Buttigieg estimates that this figure represents about 80% of those students attending such colleges. The next 10% of families, those earning between $100,000 and$150,000, would have their tuition reduced on a sliding scale.
To keep tuition costs in check, Buttigieg proposes a federal-state partnership: in exchange for receiving federal dollars states would guarantee to invest in their public higher education systems and constrain tuition increases.
Throwing money at the problem doesn't seem like a good way to address the ridiculous cost of college. That's a temporary bandaide. Why won't Congress look at why the costs have went up so much?Yes, I'm not sure any have been that blunt.
However...
Pete Buttigieg’s College Affordability Plan: The Goldilocks Solution
Pete Buttigieg unveiled his plan for college affordability last week, and it continues the Democratic presidential candidate’s tradition of positioning himself in the ideological middle of the crowded field of Democratic contenders.www.forbes.com
Throwing money at the problem doesn't seem like a good way to address the ridiculous cost of college. That's a temporary bandaide. Why won't Congress look at why the costs have went up so much?
I prefer SuperChuck anyway.Congress has taken recent steps to address the rising costs of college tuition. I would link you but you keep on making assertions that show you’re not doing your homework so I’m not going to do it for you.
Throwing money at the problem doesn't seem like a good way to address the ridiculous cost of college. That's a temporary bandaide. Why won't Congress look at why the costs have went up so much?
Pete Buttigieg is blowing the dog whistle with "heartland".
You guys have officially jumped the shark. You want to birch about PC and language police, up until the moment you want to become the language police.
When Obama called Ohio the heartland, was he dog whistling too?
You just cannot make this stuff up.