Joe Biden Accused of Sexual Assualt (1 Viewer)

Users who are viewing this thread

    Beach Friends

    Well-known member
    Joined
    Oct 2, 2019
    Messages
    2,521
    Reaction score
    1,414
    Age
    48
    Location
    Gulf
    Offline
    The video is NSFW due to language and the graphic description of Joe Biden's alleged conduct.

     
    Did he? What procedure did he suggest? I am sure he has some ideas about that since his accuser sat down for multiple interviews a month ago.

    And BTW, you are asking me that question when you just said that you would vote for Biden even if he molested children on a daily basis. (No qualification in your hypothetical about being merely accused, but he actually molested kids).

    So, where do you draw the line for when sexual assault becomes unacceptable? When the victims reach the age of consent?

    Watch the interview to see if what he said so you can make sure your goal posts are in the right place.


    I would vote for him over Trump, yes.

    Trump is my line.

    At least I can own my position.
     
    Watch the interview to see if what he said so you can make sure your goal posts are in the right place.


    I would vote for him over Trump, yes.

    Trump is my line.

    At least I can own my position.

    I watched. I especially liked when he almost said there was no corroborating evidence, but stopped himself and at corro....

    I don't know what exactly he thinks the standard for believing all women is. He says there should be a presumption that a woman is telling the truth, but apparently that presumption is effectively rebutted when the accused denies the accusation, which sounds like there is no presumption after all.

    He starts to say that the accused must prove his innocence, but again he stops himself.

    He claims a search through his records should not be done because there is no reason for the complaint to be there, but on that issue he had a Biden moment:



    I am not saying there should be a presumption that an accuser is telling the truth. In fact, I think that is an absolutely ridiculous proposition and it is contrary to our jurisprudence. Which is why Ienjoy seeing those who thought it would be a good idea to set this new standard struggle when it is applied to one of their own.

    I am not enjoying that for frivolous reasons - I hope this experience will help us get back to a sane approach.
     
    I watched. I especially liked when he almost said there was no corroborating evidence, but stopped himself and at corro....

    I don't know what exactly he thinks the standard for believing all women is. He says there should be a presumption that a woman is telling the truth, but apparently that presumption is effectively rebutted when the accused denies the accusation, which sounds like there is no presumption after all.

    He starts to say that the accused must prove his innocence, but again he stops himself.

    He claims a search through his records should not be done because there is no reason for the complaint to be there, but on that issue he had a Biden moment:



    I am not saying there should be a presumption that an accuser is telling the truth. In fact, I think that is an absolutely ridiculous proposition and it is contrary to our jurisprudence. Which is why Ienjoy seeing those who thought it would be a good idea to set this new standard struggle when it is applied to one of their own.

    I am not enjoying that for frivolous reasons - I hope this experience will help us get back to a sane approach.


    Are you saying we should vote for the candidate who has assaulted the fewest women?

    Are you suggesting that Joe Biden’s record of assaulting women should cause me to reconsider and vote for Trump instead?
     
    I watched. I especially liked when he almost said there was no corroborating evidence, but stopped himself and at corro....

    I don't know what exactly he thinks the standard for believing all women is. He says there should be a presumption that a woman is telling the truth, but apparently that presumption is effectively rebutted when the accused denies the accusation, which sounds like there is no presumption after all.

    He starts to say that the accused must prove his innocence, but again he stops himself.

    He claims a search through his records should not be done because there is no reason for the complaint to be there, but on that issue he had a Biden moment:



    I am not saying there should be a presumption that an accuser is telling the truth. In fact, I think that is an absolutely ridiculous proposition and it is contrary to our jurisprudence. Which is why Ienjoy seeing those who thought it would be a good idea to set this new standard struggle when it is applied to one of their own.

    I am not enjoying that for frivolous reasons - I hope this experience will help us get back to a sane approach.

    There is an interesting statement in there from Biden where he is trying to weasel out of his statements he made on Kavanaugh and he said "the presumption would be that she’s telling the truth, unless it’s proved that she wasn’t telling the truth, or not proved — unless it’s clear from the facts surrounding it it’s not the truth."
    So Biden is guilty until it is "proven" that Reade is not a liar. Of course "prove" is a nebulous concept and there are many standards of it, but it is interesting that even when trying to weasel out of his remarks on Kavanaugh where it was clear that Ford must be believed due to the simple fact that she made her charges public he still cannot escape the idea that an accusation means the person accused is guilty.
    By Biden's old standard and new standard - Biden is guilty of raping Tara Reade.
     
    Are you saying we should vote for the candidate who has assaulted the fewest women?

    Are you suggesting that Joe Biden’s record of assaulting women should cause me to reconsider and vote for Trump instead?

    I don't care who you vote for.
     
    There is an interesting statement in there from Biden where he is trying to weasel out of his statements he made on Kavanaugh and he said "unless it’s proved that she wasn’t telling the truth, or not proved — unless it’s clear from the facts surrounding it it’s not the truth."
    So Biden is guilty until it is "proven" that Reade is not a liar. Of course "prove" is a nebulous concept and there are many standards of it, but it is interesting that even when trying to weasel out of his remarks on Kavanaugh where it was clear that Ford must be believed due to the simple fact that she made her charges public he still cannot escape the idea that an accusation means the person accused is guilty.
    By Biden's old standard and new standard - Biden is guilty of raping Tara Reade.

    This is exactly what I am getting at. He is squirming to try to remain consistent and yet not box himself in. He's not doing a very good job for those paying attention.

    There was also a strange moment when he mentioned that there was documentation of his interaction with the POTUS concerning Biden and a head of state. It sounded like he was thinking of something in particular, and then he tried to back out and make it more general.
     
    This is exactly what I am getting at. He is squirming to try to remain consistent and yet not box himself in. He's not doing a very good job for those paying attention.

    There was also a strange moment when he mentioned that there was documentation of his interaction with the POTUS concerning Biden and a head of state. It sounded like he was thinking of something in particular, and then he tried to back out and make it more general.
    When do you think we will hear the incessant calls for an FBI investigation into the matter?
     
    I think the FBI should investigate it.

    I had assumed the alleged assault took place in Delaware. Like the alleged assault of Ford took place in Maryland. If true the state authorities would be the ones to investigate and I would expect they require some sort of complaint to be filed.

    But maybe the Biden assault is alleged to have taken place in DC. In that case, a call for the FBI to investigate makes more sense, and assuming an actual complaint is filed.
     
    I had assumed the alleged assault took place in Delaware. Like the alleged assault of Ford took place in Maryland. If true the state authorities would be the ones to investigate and I would expect they require some sort of complaint to be filed.

    But maybe the Biden assault is alleged to have taken place in DC. In that case, a call for the FBI to investigate makes more sense, and assuming an actual complaint is filed.

    Point taken, but my point wasn’t really jurisdictional.

    It should be investigated entirely, by whoever, to whatever extent the law allows.

    I wish there was an investigation into the entire kavanaugh saga, we know Avanetti was lying, he probably wasn’t the only one. That entire process should be thoroughly reviewed.


    I
     
    I had assumed the alleged assault took place in Delaware. Like the alleged assault of Ford took place in Maryland. If true the state authorities would be the ones to investigate and I would expect they require some sort of complaint to be filed.

    But maybe the Biden assault is alleged to have taken place in DC. In that case, a call for the FBI to investigate makes more sense, and assuming an actual complaint is filed.

    She said it took place in the Russell Building, so D.C.
     
    It's sounding more like those who are itching to prove they will vote for a pedophile are going to get their chance.

    A woman has come forward and alleged that when she was 14 Biden "complimented" her on the size of her breasts.
    She has friends who state that she told them contemporaneously with the incident.

    I gotta say, he sure looks like he likes female children about 12 - 14.
     
    It's sounding more like those who are itching to prove they will vote for a pedophile are going to get their chance.

    A woman has come forward and alleged that when she was 14 Biden "complimented" her on the size of her breasts.
    She has friends who state that she told them contemporaneously with the incident.

    I gotta say, he sure looks like he likes female children about 12 - 14.

    Unprecedented.
     
    It's sounding more like those who are itching to prove they will vote for a pedophile are going to get their chance.

    A woman has come forward and alleged that when she was 14 Biden "complimented" her on the size of her breasts.
    She has friends who state that she told them contemporaneously with the incident.

    I gotta say, he sure looks like he likes female children about 12 - 14.

    That’s truly what I’ve seen from the vids I’ve watched of him interacting with young girls.
    I’ve heard folks dismiss it as him just being awkward but it seems a bit more to me.
     
    Point taken, but my point wasn’t really jurisdictional.

    It should be investigated entirely, by whoever, to whatever extent the law allows.

    I wish there was an investigation into the entire kavanaugh saga, we know Avanetti was lying, he probably wasn’t the only one. That entire process should be thoroughly reviewed.


    I
    Sure, but the fault of Maryland not investigating Kavanaugh was that no one, i.e. Ford, had filed a complaint. Maryland officials even stated they were ready and willing but that they needed someone to come forward with an allegation.
     

    Create an account or login to comment

    You must be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create account

    Create an account on our community. It's easy!

    Log in

    Already have an account? Log in here.

    General News Feed

    Fact Checkers News Feed

    Back
    Top Bottom