General Election 2024 Biden vs Trump (1 Viewer)

Users who are viewing this thread

    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    SteveSBrickNJ

    Well-known member
    Joined
    Jan 7, 2022
    Messages
    1,624
    Reaction score
    763
    Age
    62
    Location
    New Jersey
    Offline
    As we head toward the summer and the National Party Conventions, it might be handy to have a thread focused on the upcoming matchup of current President Biden vs Former President Trump.
    As of April 28,2024 , CNN's poll shows Trump leading. Yet polls are not always accurate and they are constantly changing.
    Feel free to use this thread for all things relating to Biden vs Trump.
    *
    *
     
    A jury convicts and decides innocence or guilt. A judge decides the punishment. Trump is a convict.
    How hard is this to understand? Really?
    Former Federal Prosecutor for 22 years:



    That sounds like what could be possibly happening here:

    With Donald Trump's sentencing in his New York hush money case delayed until September following Tuesday's decision by Judge Juan Merchan, the judge now faces the task of applying the Supreme Court's new test for the limits of presidential immunity to the former president's criminal conviction.

    Trump in May was found guilty on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records related to a 2016 hush money payment to adult film actress Stormy Daniels in order to boost his electoral prospects in the 2016 presidential election.

    Trump's lawyers have argued that the judge should "set aside" the jury's verdict in the case because the jury heard evidence during the trial that would have been protected by presidential immunity, based on Monday's ruling by the Supreme Court that Trump is entitled to "at least presumptive immunity" from criminal prosecution for official acts taken while in office.


    It's possible that the case or some of the charges will have to be dismissed because some evidence that the prosecutors used wouldn't be admissible based on the recent SCOTUS ruling.
     
    Former Federal Prosecutor for 22 years:



    That sounds like what could be possibly happening here:

    With Donald Trump's sentencing in his New York hush money case delayed until September following Tuesday's decision by Judge Juan Merchan, the judge now faces the task of applying the Supreme Court's new test for the limits of presidential immunity to the former president's criminal conviction.

    Trump in May was found guilty on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records related to a 2016 hush money payment to adult film actress Stormy Daniels in order to boost his electoral prospects in the 2016 presidential election.

    Trump's lawyers have argued that the judge should "set aside" the jury's verdict in the case because the jury heard evidence during the trial that would have been protected by presidential immunity, based on Monday's ruling by the Supreme Court that Trump is entitled to "at least presumptive immunity" from criminal prosecution for official acts taken while in office.


    It's possible that the case or some of the charges will have to be dismissed because some evidence that the prosecutors used wouldn't be admissible based on the recent SCOTUS ruling.


    Dictionary:

    Conviction- noun- a formal declaration that someone is guilty of a criminal offense, made by the verdict of a jury or the decision of a judge in a court of law.


    So someone may want to explain to your attorney pal that semantics, is just that....semantics. This is the current definition of "conviction" ( as a noun ) and there are no other definitions.

    So by this same argument, if you were applying for a job, and the question was "have you ever been convicted of a felony" and you were found guilty of a felony, but had yet to be "sentenced" for that guilty find, you would be SAFE to say "NO"????

    LOLOLOL- how did you tie your brain into a pretzel this time?
     
    Dictionary:

    Conviction- noun- a formal declaration that someone is guilty of a criminal offense, made by the verdict of a jury or the decision of a judge in a court of law.


    So someone may want to explain to your attorney pal that semantics, is just that....semantics. This is the current definition of "conviction" ( as a noun ) and there are no other definitions.

    So by this same argument, if you were applying for a job, and the question was "have you ever been convicted of a felony" and you were found guilty of a felony, but had yet to be "sentenced" for that guilty find, you would be SAFE to say "NO"????

    LOLOLOL- how did you tie your brain into a pretzel this time?
    Oh the dictionary. That holds a lot of weight in our legal system.
     
    Oh the dictionary. That holds a lot of weight in our legal system.

    let me help you help yourself untie that pretzel


    A conviction is an adjudication of a criminal defendant's guilt; specifically, it is the act or judicial process of finding a criminal defendant guilty of a charged offense. [Last updated in June of 2021 by the Wex Definitions Team] THE LEGAL PROCESS.

     
    Oh the dictionary. That holds a lot of weight in our legal system.

    As opposed to citing a single Twitter source who may not be who he claims.

    There are lawyers here telling you you’re wrong but I say it doesn’t really matter. Trump was found guilty of 34 felonies by a jury. Shipwreckedcrew can’t twist that truth into something else it isn’t.
     
    let me help you help yourself untie that pretzel


    A conviction is an adjudication of a criminal defendant's guilt; specifically, it is the act or judicial process of finding a criminal defendant guilty of a charged offense. [Last updated in June of 2021 by the Wex Definitions Team] THE LEGAL PROCESS.

    And what happens if the case is dismissed which is a possibility after the SCOTUS ruling?

    What would you call him then? A previously convicted felon but not anymore?
     
    And what happens if the case is dismissed which is a possibility after the SCOTUS ruling?

    What would you call him then? A previously convicted felon but not anymore?

    You realize this happens and what to call them isn’t some hang up we can’t work around?

    In his case, we can call him Adjudicated Rapist Donald Trump. Epstein Friend Donald Trump. Twice Impeached Donald Trump. There are options.
     
    And what happens if the case is dismissed which is a possibility after the SCOTUS ruling?

    What would you call him then? A previously convicted felon but not anymore?
    um. How would you call violating election law and committing 34 felonies BEFORE YOU WERE ELECTED part of his official duties?
     
    You realize this happens and what to call them isn’t some hang up we can’t work around?

    In his case, we can call him Adjudicated Rapist Donald Trump. Epstein Friend Donald Trump. Twice Impeached Donald Trump. There are options.
    Trump is such an easy target yet you have to continue to lie. The jury didn't find that he raped her and you know that.

    Weren't you one of the people here still repeating the debunked very fine people comment about Trump?
     
    um. How would you call violating election law and committing 34 felonies BEFORE YOU WERE ELECTED part of his official duties?
    The article I posted above talked about the evidence that is probably now considered inadmissible due to the SCOTUS ruling.
     
    Trump is such an easy target yet you have to continue to lie. The jury didn't find that he raped her and you know that.

    Weren't you one of the people here still repeating the debunked very fine people comment about Trump?

    I don’t know, was I? That’s something I don’t spend a lot of time focused on now. I accepted a long time ago that Trump is a bigot who panders to bigotry.

    You’re right, it was “sexual abuse”. He’s an adjudicated sexual abuser.
     
    Trump is such an easy target yet you have to continue to lie. The jury didn't find that he raped her and you know that.

    Weren't you one of the people here still repeating the debunked very fine people comment about Trump?

    This is hilarious.

    No SFL, I'm not waiting until his sentencing in September to call him a convicted felon. He was convicted by a jury. That's enough buddy. It's hilarious you are trying to push back on this.

    I am thankful for all our new conserative legal scholars. We've got 3, or 4 on the board now.
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    General News Feed

    Fact Checkers News Feed

    Back
    Top Bottom