Biden Tracker (2 Viewers)

Users who are viewing this thread

    Oops. I wonder if they have plans to return the stolen money...
     
    Biden's handlers already said he was 'against' this but we all know what that means. This dementia ridden old fool will soon being telling us that only way to help the Ukrainesians is by turning in our gas stoves for the war effort. He is will also believe it.


     
    Yes, Farb, and we will be using those 87,000 IRS agents to go door to door and rip the stoves out of your houses. Armed with AR-15’s.

    My god, the right is pathetic.
     
    Yes, Farb, and we will be using those 87,000 IRS agents to go door to door and rip the stoves out of your houses. Armed with AR-15’s.

    My god, the right is pathetic.
    Did I say that? I was just pointing that there is no limit to nanny state that the 'green new deal' is desperately wanting to create.

    In some ways, the right is pathetic, but at the very minimum, the right doesn't attempt to justify the need for sicko men to live out their fetish of dressing up in woman face in front of children. So, I guess to each their own.
     
    Did I say that? I was just pointing that there is no limit to nanny state that the 'green new deal' is desperately wanting to create.

    In some ways, the right is pathetic, but at the very minimum, the right doesn't attempt to justify the need for sicko men to live out their fetish of dressing up in woman face in front of children. So, I guess to each their own.
    No, the right wants to tell everyone what they can and cannot say, women in MO state house what they can and cannot wear, women who want an IUD that they cannot have the meds that would make insertion less painful, women who are raped and impregnated that they must complete that pregnancy, teachers who want to put a family picture on their desk that they cannot unless it’s the “right” type of family, etc ad nauseum.
     
    Did I say that? I was just pointing that there is no limit to nanny state that the 'green new deal' is desperately wanting to create.

    In some ways, the right is pathetic, but at the very minimum, the right doesn't attempt to justify the need for sicko men to live out their fetish of dressing up in woman face in front of children. So, I guess to each their own.
    How many of all these supposed drag shows that cater to children that you are so GD worried about have children present without their parents either being there or consenting?

    Why do you want to tell everybody what they can and can‘t do all the damn time?

    it’s sick, is what it is.
     
    Did I say that? I was just pointing that there is no limit to nanny state that the 'green new deal' is desperately wanting to create.

    In some ways, the right is pathetic, but at the very minimum, the right doesn't attempt to justify the need for sicko men to live out their fetish of dressing up in woman face in front of children. So, I guess to each their own.
    Farb, Democrats want to empower women, all people, to the same level as certain men are currently empowered to, which leads to an equal partner parents state.

    It's wealthy Republicans who want to maintain the status quo where wealthy parents abandon their kids to a nanny state, whilst wives are to be young, pretty trophies, even if it means a MAN will wear out three women during their lifetimes to possess such pretty private property.

    As usual whatever Republicans are saying Democrats are doing, that is actually what Republicans are doing.
     
    How many of all these supposed drag shows that cater to children that you are so GD worried about have children present without their parents either being there or consenting?

    Why do you want to tell everybody what they can and can‘t do all the damn time?

    it’s sick, is what it is.
    Why do you think it is so horrible to ask grown men with a fetish to not practice their fetish in front of children?
    Should kids be allowed in strip clubs under parental supervision? Why is so important for the DNC to allow drag shows with children present?
     
    Farb, Democrats want to empower women, all people, to the same level as certain men are currently empowered to, which leads to an equal partner parents state.

    It's wealthy Republicans who want to maintain the status quo where wealthy parents abandon their kids to a nanny state, whilst wives are to be young, pretty trophies, even if it means a MAN will wear out three women during their lifetimes to possess such pretty private property.

    As usual whatever Republicans are saying Democrats are doing, that is actually what Republicans are doing.
    What about the women that want to change in a lockerroom and not see a penis in a female bathroom? Are those the women the DNC wants to empower?

    https://www.kusi.com/santee-ymca-allows-naked-man-to-use-womens-locker-room-with-underage-girls/

    "SANTEE (KUSI) – Recently, 17-year-old, Rebecca Phillips, visited the Santee YMCA to workout after work, as she routinely does.

    But this time, as she was showering, she encountered a naked man inside the women’s locker as she was showering. Rebecca is underage, and explained to Santee City Council that she was scared for her safety."


    If this is the DNC definition of 'empowering' then they are doing an outstanding job.
     
    What about the women that want to change in a lockerroom and not see a penis in a female bathroom? Are those the women the DNC wants to empower?

    https://www.kusi.com/santee-ymca-allows-naked-man-to-use-womens-locker-room-with-underage-girls/

    "SANTEE (KUSI) – Recently, 17-year-old, Rebecca Phillips, visited the Santee YMCA to workout after work, as she routinely does.

    But this time, as she was showering, she encountered a naked man inside the women’s locker as she was showering. Rebecca is underage, and explained to Santee City Council that she was scared for her safety."


    If this is the DNC definition of 'empowering' then they are doing an outstanding job.
    Easy to fix, put in private changing stalls in locker rooms. Adapt the rooms for the people, not the people for the rooms. I hate locker rooms for their lack of privacy anyway.

    I won't protest to save the open locker rooms. Change the code for private stalls and do away with them. Their time has gone.

    I can't remember the last time I caught even a passing glimpse of a penis in a men's room standing there right next to other men at the urinals.

    Why would I think woman would be more likely to see one in woman's room even if an occasional one was in there?
     
    Did I say that? I was just pointing that there is no limit to nanny state that the 'green new deal' is desperately wanting to create.

    In some ways, the right is pathetic, but at the very minimum, the right doesn't attempt to justify the need for sicko men to live out their fetish of dressing up in woman face in front of children. So, I guess to each their own.
    What does this have to do with the green new deal?
     
    Why do you think it is so horrible to ask grown men with a fetish to not practice their fetish in front of children?
    Should kids be allowed in strip clubs under parental supervision? Why is so important for the DNC to allow drag shows with children present?
    Why do you not let parents take care of what their children are allowed to attend? Why do you believe every questionable source you read online? A regular drag show isn’t in any way sexually explicit, any more than any other concert. Why do you want to police how other people raise their kids?
     

    Create an account or login to comment

    You must be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create account

    Create an account on our community. It's easy!

    Log in

    Already have an account? Log in here.

    General News Feed

    Fact Checkers News Feed

    Back
    Top Bottom