- Banned
- #1
SaintForLife
Well-known member
Offline
Trump is alive, but his ear was bleeding
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And she makes a pretty convenient target because it reinforces their natural misogyny. The ire against the female agents and the director is something to behold.Because screw the facts, someone needs to pay regardless who actually forked up. People have zero interest in sorting things out.
Indeed. It's funny, they want her out but can't explain legitimately why they want her out. It's gross.And she makes a pretty convenient target because it reinforces their natural misogyny. The ire against the female agents and the director is something to behold.
I think that’s the likely reality. And it's likely that a convergence of factors, including his generally non-threatening appearance that allowed him to move around despite attracting some attention and probably some complacency on the part of the security, allowed him to do what he did. No conspiracy needed.conspiracy theorists can't accept the easiest and most obvious answer. Cooks was a deeply troubled young man and
Trump just happened to be in his area. There is nothing political about this. Cooks is a nut case just like John Hinkley.
There are legitimate reasons why the drugs cost more in the US than Canada. A majority of the drug patents in the world are from the US. It costs millions and millions to research and develop a drug. For every one that is approved and put into production there are 25 that aren't for the same cost of research. They give them patents to recoup the money they spent to develop the drugs. Canada and other countries don’t respect the patent laws and the minute the drug is on the market they take it and sell a different version much cheaper without having spent any of the money to develop it. Unless the US government wants to develop the drugs themselves private companies spend the money. Yes they get some grants but not nearly enough to cover costs.There are many ways to do it. To start he could...
Big pharma needs to stop sponsoring news shows and charging us $12,000 for a drug that you can get in Canada for $2,000. They need less influence on our government.
The NIH needs to be reigned in and have much more oversight and gain of function needs to be permanently banned.
He could replace the head of the FDA with someone who isn't so close to big pharma.
The people who complain about Chevron Deference being overturned and saying these agencies will lose power but they don't ever mention how the head of many of these agencies come from the very companies that they are regulating.
I thought his Dad was Libertarian and mother was a democrat?We know he was an American, a registered Republican from a MAGA family.
Why did you capitalize the word patriot?
You’re holding back on us, aren’t you? You’re already invested in some bat shirt crazy conspiracy theory and you’re too chicken to spring that on us, so you’re spamming the board with all these posts questioning stuff we all already know about.
Just tell us.
He died with a song in his heart.Not peacefully i’m guessing
I am saying that punishment should be dished out once this is all done.the facts arent all in yet.
Do you know what the responsibility of Local LE was via contract? USSS? of course not.
What he is saying is folks are taking snippets of comments, placing them in their own context and posting them to social media as a "see?!??! GOTCHA" moment.
No one is claiming she should be immune from responsibility. They are saying WAIT til all facts are laid out and whatever findings come from whatever review happens. Until then, it’s pure speculation.
By that logic (25 years means everything) she should be judged even harsher given she has been around since the Clinton administration.Everything @efil4 said, plus: Her 25 yrs of service has EVERYTHING to do with it, coupled with the positions she held within the USSS, it makes her a SME! She should be judged on her actions following their investigation. She was not in the field on that day, if it is determined that her field agents didn't comply with USSS standards and she takes no corrective actions, then your calls for her head would be warranted.
There are legitimate reasons why the drugs cost more in the US than Canada. A majority of the drug patents in the world are from the US. It costs millions and millions to research and develop a drug. For every one that is approved and put into production there are 25 that aren't for the same cost of research. They give them patents to recoup the money they spent to develop the drugs. Canada and other countries don’t respect the patent laws and the minute the drug is on the market they take it and sell a different version much cheaper without having spent any of the money to develop it. Unless the US government wants to develop the drugs themselves private companies spend the money. Yes they get some grants but not nearly enough to cover costs.
Then what are you using to make your judgment? Is it performance based? How did you reach the conclusion that she should be fired?By that logic (25 years means everything) she should be judged even harsher given she has been around since the Clinton administration.
He died with a song in his heart.
I am saying that punishment should be dished out once this is all done.
By that logic (25 years means everything) she should be judged even harsher given she has been around since the Clinton administration.
Does 25 years of service count for anything in a job that requires an act of Congress to be terminated from?i think everyone been saying that. His comment that you quoted was specific to waiting it out and not jumping to conclusions regading someone with 25 year of public service.
Does the 25 years of service count for anything? Of course it does.
In every profession where mistakes are made and folks have to be held accountable, consideration is given based on years of service. ( with respect to punishment )
Courts do it as well.
I worked for the TSA for 3 years to make ends meet while I was an undergrad. So accumulating 25 years in a government job isn’t all that impressive to me, nor is it something that garners my immediate respect.LOL now you sound like Goodell..." if you didnt know, you should have known" ( re Bountygate/Sean Payton )
The 25 years is thrown out there just to deflect any criticism. How does their time of service somehow negate the worst secret service security failure?Does 25 years of service count for anything in a job that requires an act of Congress to be terminated from?
I have not said ready, fire, aim regarding her (or any USSS employee) termination, however this needs to be rectified soon. I can’t imagine anyone’s confidence in the USSS will improve if someone isn’t shirt canned.
I worked for the TSA for 3 years to make ends meet while I was an undergrad. So accumulating 25 years in a government job isn’t all that impressive to me, nor is it something that garners my immediate respect.
The 25 years is thrown out there just to deflect any criticism. How does their time of service somehow negate the worst secret service security failure?