- May 17, 2019
- Reaction score
- Outside Atlanta
So that is a retort now on this board, using the comments of a posted article to project on the poster? Is this something that is can be done now, because I could just post vile, racist, and evil comments from left leaning sources as well. That might actually be a fun game.
I will also give you a hint @coldseat, when you have to go personal and make assumptions on someone being 'radicalized', it really weakens your position in the argument. You ask around in your playhouse.
I still want to know why the use of data (13%) is racist? Seriously...
Absolutely fantastic post.You know why
You know EXACTLY why
it's the same reason the China Flu is racist
because it's used to excuse and encourage racist behavior and opinions
The 13% is a population version of "might makes right"
They're ONLY 13%. Who cares what they think?
They're ONLY 13%. Who cares what they want?
We can treat them however we want. They're ONLY 13%, What can they do about it?
Why are we changing all these rules, laws, attitudes and mindsets for ONLY 13%
The problem with this attitude?
The year 2044. That's the year when according to the Census Bureau the United States of America will become a majority minority country
White people will still be the single most populous race but all other races combined will be more than 50%
When you hear "they're taking our country" that's what they're talking about, that's what they're worried, that's what they're terrified about
But what they are most terrified about, is being treated like they've treated everyone else
When the attitude is "Might makes right", and you've been wielding that hammer and you lose your "might" you're scared just waiting for the hammer blow
Yeah, I had never heard/seen or used 'the 13%', so I don't really care if that is considered racist or not.
Unless your a Biden....
And I do believe in calling out racism when I see it. I guess that makes me anti-racist? I think so.
I was told this doesn't exist and to be 'threatened and offended' by it was comical because it just didn't exist except by disinformation.Why are you asking us? You already are offended and threatened by it.
Are you asking people here to defend that guys paper? If so, I'm guessing all you'll hear are crickets.
Just so I am clear on what you are saying, the Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association (JAPA), is a fringe journal?Well Farb we are told all the time by you and others that there are just some bad apples, and we can’t let them spoil the bunch, right?
Nobody of consequence is saying anything remotely close to this.
So either the fringe speaks for the whole or it doesn’t. We both know it doesn’t. But frankly, I will be happy to compare the left fringe up against the right any day, in regards to domestic threat level.
I mean, we could go back and forth over what a threat entails etc. Or we can go straight to the score cards:
Right Wing attempts at hostile government takeover: 1
Left Wing attempts at hostile government takeover: 0
Since you asked: as journals go, it's ranked 9,686th in terms of impact in the most recent Journal Citation Reports. Even just among Psychiatry journals, it's 117th (out of 142). So, basically, yes, it is a fringe journal. Psychoanalysis in general is not exactly mainstream.Just so I am clear on what you are saying, the Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association (JAPA), is a fringe journal?