Will “mass deportation” actually happen (5 Viewers)

Users who are viewing this thread

superchuck500

U.S. Blues
Joined
Mar 26, 2019
Messages
6,679
Reaction score
16,512
Location
Charleston, SC
Offline
It’s so repulsive to see people cheering for what is basically 80% the same thing as the Holocaust - different end result but otherwise very similar.

Economists have said it would tank the economy and cause inflation - notwithstanding the cost.

Is it going to actually happen or is this Build The Wall 2.0?

 

Not a question of "if?", it's "when?".

I agree it's likely to happen. I think killing an unarmed person will be the beginning of a very quick end to ICE being allowed to do what they're doing. I also think it will not be forgotten when the midterms roll around. I also think that if the Trump and the Republicans do anything to overtly prevent the elections, that will much more likely lead to a civil war situation than a Nazi Germany situation.

As vile and unacceptable as it is, Trump's and the Republican's mistreatment of active and veteran soldiers will protect us from the entire military ever backing a Trump lead tyrannical regime.

On a less important note, notice how the agent that got out of the car forgot to pull his mask back up? That dude's going to be identified. I've also heard through the grapevine that the dude got a clear photo of the license plate, so yeah that's going to be identified too.
 
I agree it's likely to happen. I think killing an unarmed person will be the beginning of a very quick end to ICE being allowed to do what they're doing. I also think it will not be forgotten when the midterms roll around. ...I've also heard through the grapevine that the dude got a clear photo of the license plate, so yeah that's going to be identified too.
It's likely that the car is a rental that will lead straight to the Government
 
CNN) — A federal appeals court is allowing President Donald Trump to continue having control of thousands of members of California’s National Guard.

The 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals granted a request from Trump to lift, for now, a lower-court ruling that had required the president to relinquish control of roughly 4,000 guardsman from the Golden State that he had federalized to beef up security in Los Angeles amid unrest over immigration enforcement.

The court said in an unsigned ruling “that it is likely that the President lawfully exercised his statutory authority” under the federal law he invoked to federalize the guardsmen earlier this month, rejecting arguments pushed by California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom that Trump had violated federal law when he seized control of part of his state’s militia.

Last week, US District Judge Charles Breyer directed the president to relinquish control of the guardsmen after concluding that Trump had violated several provisions of the law he leaned on in order to take control of the troops, including one that requires presidents to issue an order “through the governor” when they want to federalize state troops……..



 
CNN) — A federal appeals court is allowing President Donald Trump to continue having control of thousands of members of California’s National Guard.

The 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals granted a request from Trump to lift, for now, a lower-court ruling that had required the president to relinquish control of roughly 4,000 guardsman from the Golden State that he had federalized to beef up security in Los Angeles amid unrest over immigration enforcement.

The court said in an unsigned ruling “that it is likely that the President lawfully exercised his statutory authority” under the federal law he invoked to federalize the guardsmen earlier this month, rejecting arguments pushed by California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom that Trump had violated federal law when he seized control of part of his state’s militia.

Last week, US District Judge Charles Breyer directed the president to relinquish control of the guardsmen after concluding that Trump had violated several provisions of the law he leaned on in order to take control of the troops, including one that requires presidents to issue an order “through the governor” when they want to federalize state troops……..



In other words, the Appellate Court passes the buck to SCotUS.
 
In other words, the Appellate Court passes the buck to SCotUS.
The future of the USA is now in the hands of Scotus in my opinion. I'm worried quite frankly.
ACB's vote will be critical. They should have known giving a psychopathic narcissist as much
power as they have recently would come with dire consequences.
 
Last edited:
The sheer density of those who thought that this was going to be clean and limited to criminal types was always beyond foolish. The focus now is on arrests at immigration court (where clearly the migrants are trying to be legal) and at job sites (where the migrants are working - not committing crimes). And still, most of these people go to detention centers - they aren’t just released to freedom in some other country.

It’s also abundantly clear that this is not about public safety or job competition - and the biggest tell on that is where these operations are happening. They’re not happening in red states where Trump’s constituencies are supposedly facing criminal threat and loss of jobs from the migrant hordes. It’s happening in blue territories because the true interest is cruelty to migrants and anguish on the communities that are empathetic to them. Any other presentation is nonsense.



 
Last edited:
1750435875720.png
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

General News Feed

Fact Checkers News Feed

Back
Top Bottom