Trump proposals and what actually gets accomplished (2 Viewers)

[MT15]

I don’t think this fits into any current thread - it’s not an appointment or anything. Maybe a thread to keep track of his proposals and whether they are implemented?

 

[horse2H5]

Read the article in the post I replied to.

ok I read a bunch of speculation. Can you point to what services are going to be cut. And how do we know its going to be cut when the man isn't in office yet. Do you have a statement from him or someone who speaks for him that said that there will be cuts to services for the poor?

Let me guess, common sense?

 

[Dragon]

ok I read a bunch of speculation. Can you point to what services are going to be cut. And how do we know its going to be cut when the man isn't in office yet. Do you have a statement from him or someone who speaks for him that said that there will be cuts to services for the poor?

Let me guess, common sense?

Read the article - and more than the first paragraph. All the details is there. I don't need to get everything for you constantly. Do some work yourself

 

[superchuck500]

ok I read a bunch of speculation. Can you point to what services are going to be cut. And how do we know its going to be cut when the man isn't in office yet. Do you have a statement from him or someone who speaks for him that said that there will be cuts to services for the poor?

Let me guess, common sense?

It's not pure speculation - these are reports from various meetings within the GOP caucus on the Hill who have been meeting (including a Mar-a-Lago) about their plan in "enact the Trump agenda". Some of these representatives have appeared on TV news shows and talked about what is "on the table" - and the discussion includes some of these elements.

But you're right that nothing concrete is on meaningful paper yet . . .

 

[Optimus Prime]

Guess this can go here
================

Incoming senior Trump administration officials have begun questioning career civil servantswho work on the White House National Security Council about who they voted for in the 2024 election, their political contributions and whether they have made social media posts that could be considered incriminating by President-elect Donald Trump's team, according to a U.S. official familiar with the matter.

At least some of these nonpolitical employees have begun packing up their belongings since being asked about their loyalty to Trump — after they had earlier been given indications that they would be asked to stay on at the NSC in the new administration, the official said, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive personnel matters.

Trump's pick for national security adviser, Florida Rep. Mike Waltz, in recent days publicly signaled his intention to get rid of all nonpolitical appointees and career intelligence officials serving on the NSC by Inauguration Day to ensure the council is staffed with those who support Trump's agenda.

A wholesale removal of foreign policy and national security experts from the NSC on Day 1 of the new administration could deprive Trump's team of considerable expertise and institutional knowledge at a time when the U.S. is grappling with difficult policy challenges in Ukraine, the Mideast and beyond. Such questioning could also make new policy experts brought in to the NSC less likely to speak up about policy differences and concerns.…….

Civil servants are being asked who they voted for in 2024 election

Trump’s pick for national security adviser wants staff who are “100 percent aligned with the president’s agenda.”

www.independent.co.uk