Trump loyalists in Congress to challenge Electoral College results in Jan. 6 joint session (Update: Insurrectionists storm Congress)(And now what?) (3 Viewers)

Users who are viewing this thread

    superchuck500

    U.S. Blues
    Joined
    Mar 26, 2019
    Messages
    5,450
    Reaction score
    14,212
    Location
    Charleston, SC
    Offline
    I guess it's time to start a thread for this. We know that at least 140 members of Congress have pledged to join the objection. Under federal law, if at least one member of each house (HOR and Senate) objects, each house will adjourn the joint session for their own session (limited at two hours) to take up the objection. If both houses pass a resolution objecting to the EC result, further action can take place. If both houses do not (i.e. if one or neither passes a resolution), the objection is powerless and the college result is certified.

    Clearly this is political theater as we know such a resolution will not pass the House, and there's good reason to think it wouldn't pass the Senate either (with or without the two senators from Georgia). The January 6 joint session is traditionally a ceremonial one. This one will not be.

    Many traditional pillars of Republican support have condemned the plan as futile and damaging. Certainly the Trump loyalists don't care - and many are likely doing it for fundraising purposes or to carry weight with the fraction of their constituencies that think this is a good idea.


     
    lol Sen Lankford "thousands of pages of evidence" how pathetic
    it just dawned on me that this is similar to the "50,000 pages of evidence that the saints had a bounty program"
    from what I gather he wants a committee to evaluate all this "evidence" then let the states decide who the votes should go to, or something to that effect
     
    I was only half-listening, but did they just adjourn abruptly in the middle of Lankford's sedition speech?
     
    a co worker was telling me that someone from Arizona has copies of 35k illegal votes, and had proof they were illegal.
    I told her it was probably BS. I can't watch all this, what's the word on those?
     
    The allegation is that there is fraud!!!

    On a side note, I have billions missing from my checking account and I've heard that Ivanka has been seen in my bank many people have told me this and I cannot dismiss it as a coincidence that she was there and my account doesn't have billions I demand that the postal service conduct a forensic audit on my bank and hers to determine why my account is missing billions!!!!

    I just checked my bank account and I also have billions that are not there!!!
     
    Hmm..saw a Trump/JFK Jr flag out front in the protest crowd...

    Apparently they think some guy named Vincent Fusca is really JFK Jr and has been in hiding for the last 20 years and will emerge as trumps running mate for 2024.

    Craaazy
     
    lol Sen Lankford "thousands of pages of evidence" how pathetic
    it just dawned on me that this is similar to the "50,000 pages of evidence that the saints had a bounty program"
    from what I gather he wants a committee to evaluate all this "evidence" then let the states decide who the votes should go to, or something to that effect
    I thought Lankford had integrity. He was very good in some of the Senate committees I've seen him talk in. Guess not.
     
    Protestors are now inside the capitol. What the fork.
     

    Create an account or login to comment

    You must be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create account

    Create an account on our community. It's easy!

    Log in

    Already have an account? Log in here.

    General News Feed

    Fact Checkers News Feed

    Back
    Top Bottom