superchuck500
U.S. Blues
Offline
Surely to be a clown show. We know that RFK certainly thinks he’s getting nominated for HHS, which includes FDA.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I hate cherry picking posts,but that's all he's doing on this thread.Oh good lord... Do you realize you are now shifting the goal post,
Easy for you to say MT. You weren’t an owner of a business deemed non essential. So it is no skin off your back. Perhaps you weren’t the parent of a kid that lost one to two years of education. Lots of folks were affected by the decisions made by a few unelected “experts” who were insulted when asked about the science backing up their decisions. It only cost this country trillions of dollars and you think it’s petty and small for people to ask those experts where and how they get their information before we spend billions and take away the rights of people to make a living.There originally was science behind it. Just because he couldn’t cite it while being grilled by malicious liars doesn’t mean there wasn’t science behind it.
I see you are backtracking now. You originally said he admitted he lied. Now that we see he did no such thing here you are toting those goalposts all over the place.
It will forever mystify me why people like you are so eager to be miserable little men, crying over a scientist who was going with the best information he had at the time and updating it as more information became available. Why be that way? Because you’re told to be that way. That is why.
Yeah, I don’t think an increase of 1/2% is in any way impactful. Do the math.Are you kidding? That's the average number tuned in during prime time, it's not the same 2.5 million people watching at all times! The actual reach is a lot more than that. I mean, come on.
For those who'd like something more informed than someone googling "average Fox audience" and combining that with "nuh uh", here's a recent (last month) study from the Journal of Public Economics: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047272724001920
Abstract:
This paper provides a comprehensive assessment of the effect of Fox News Channel (FNC) on the mass public’s political preferences and voting behavior in the United States from 2000 to 2020. We show that FNC has shifted the ideology and partisan identity of Americans rightward. This shift has helped Republican candidates in elections across levels of U.S. government over the past decade. Our estimates suggests that an increase of 0.05 rating points in Fox News viewership, induced by exogenous changes in channel placement, has increased Republican vote shares by at least 0.5 percentage points in recent presidential, Senate, House, and gubernatorial elections. Our findings have broad implications for political behavior, elections, and the political process in the United States.
Well then maybe he should have posted something more relevant if there is plenty of research.So schools and offices are not enclosed spaces with Aircondition/recycled air went systems?
There has been plenty of research on this - I will find some more for you but the conditions are not too dissimilar to an aircraft
So we should do whatever the government instructs us to do without question? Surrender our rights to question the government?Oh good lord... Do you realize you are now shifting the goal post, and not even in an interesting way? You started off saying there was no research or scientific basis for the 6ft rule. I provided a very, very brief history of how the concept of creating distance to lower infection rates of airborne respiratory illnesses, and then gave a link to the first study I am aware of that increased that distance from 3 to 6 feet. And I mentioned there have been other studies as well. And the only thing you can come up with is that it was in an airplane? Really? Did it even occur to you to maybe spend 2 minutes of searching "evidence for distance to lower respiratory illness infection" and see what you can find? You might have run across this article with links to all sorts of studies that led to this line of thinking (https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/what-...tancing-rule-to-reduce-covid-19-transmission/)
But this is all besides the point, because at the heart of all this - the very premise we are engaging in is crap. Medical recommendations are not determined by our googling skills. Public health officials should not have to prove to @TampaJoe or @UncleTrvlingJim of each and every recommendation... that's just stupid. Good public health is created by setting up a process where experts review available research and make recommendations based on that. Which is roughly what we have... the process itself can always be improved, more honest criticism of our performance centers around the CDC being a bit too slow to adapt to changing information and being too cautious at times, neglecting other costs of isolation. But that is not what you are engaging in, at all.
I didn’t say he was out to get me personally. I’m saying he made recommendations that affected millions of people and the science didn’t back him up. Not in masking. Not in the 6 ft rule. Not in the lab leak theory. I’m not into his educated guesses. You can bank on those if you choose. I do not.I hate cherry picking posts,but that's all he's doing on this thread.
Tampa, you bring good debate to this forum,but you are wrong here. Dr. Fauci was not out to get you. You've
obviously tuned out facts and your mind is made up.
Well then maybe he should have posted something more relevant if there is plenty of research.
As for similarities, an aircraft interior versus the interior of Lowe’s or Home Depot? 200 people in a tube versus people in a local retail store or 35 students in a classroom. You are stretching.
Well then maybe he should have posted something more relevant if there is plenty of research.
As for similarities, an aircraft interior versus the interior of Lowe’s or Home Depot? 200 people in a tube versus people in a local retail store or 35 students in a classroom. You are stretching.
I didn’t say he was out to get me personally. I’m saying he made recommendations that affected millions of people and the science didn’t back him up. Not in masking. Not in the 6 ft rule. Not in the lab leak theory. I’m not into his educated guesses. You can bank on those if you choose. I do not.
He’s not arguing with any honesty. He’s changed his accusations freely as they get knocked down.
The smearing of Fauci is a stinking piece of excrement, and Joe is pushing it all over this forum.
Now you are being stupid and silly. The size of the space and the ventilation in an airplane are totally different. Ventilation was the key. Not distance. Proper filtration.Is a distance of 12 inches on an airplane different than 12 inches in Home Depot?
PTKPeople have shown you the science. Your inability to understand is your problem, not ours. Maybe you should stop talking until you grasp what is being said.
Which is roughly what we have... the process itself can always be improved, more honest criticism of our performance centers around the CDC being a bit too slow to adapt to changing information and being too cautious at times, neglecting other costs of isolation. But that is not what you are engaging in, at all.
Easy for you to say MT. You weren’t an owner of a business deemed non essential. So it is no skin off your back. Perhaps you weren’t the parent of a kid that lost one to two years of education. Lots of folks were affected by the decisions made by a few unelected “experts” who were insulted when asked about the science backing up their decisions. It only cost this country trillions of dollars and you think it’s petty and small for people to ask those experts where and how they get their information before we spend billions and take away the rights of people to make a living.
This belongs in the Covid thread really, but, to be blunt, you are wildly ignorant on this topic. Ventilation is one important factor, but it's not magic. Air flow disperses virus-laden particles and aerosols over time, it doesn't instantaneously whip them away. Distancing is an additional factor that also reduces exposure to virus-laden particles and aerosols. Masking is another factor that also does the same.Now you are being stupid and silly. The size of the space and the ventilation in an airplane are totally different. Ventilation was the key. Not distance. Proper filtration.
Now you are being stupid and silly. The size of the space and the ventilation in an airplane are totally different. Ventilation was the key. Not distance. Proper filtration.
Sorry coldest. You are wrong. I was critical of this shutdown and restrictive policy from almost the beginning. I understood the initial reaction when we were trying to understand what we were up against. That I get. But we knew fairly quickly how this virus was transmitted and whom was at risk. But instead of focusing limited resources on the threat and those most at risk, we chose to try to micromanage the behavior of 320 million people. And it didn’t work.The thing that Republicans like @TampaJoe never seem to understand is that if they came at it form this prospective, they would get a lot of Democrats/Progressives on board with making changes and improving policy in the government bureaucracy like at the CDC or NIH. We all know things weren't done perfectly during the pandemic. We know the isolation, especially with young kids, had negative effects. We know education for young kids really suffered. And so we know things could have been done differently and that we can learn from this last experience and do things better the next time. So this could have truly been an opportunity to come together and improve government in a untied way.
But that's not what we get from them. Instead we get the right wing outrage machine led by Fox News. We get the conspiracies. We get the ostracizing and demonizing of public officials who were doing their best during a very difficult time. And now, all of that rage has gotten an authoritarian elected and director of HHS that doesn't even understand basic science and is filled with his own whacked out conspiracy. It's like Republicans are just determined to make everything worse.
Take this for example. Here @TampaJoe is blaming "the decisions made by a few unelected "experts"", for decisions made to shut down businesses or go to remote learning during the pandemic. But that's not what happened. The CDC and NIH put out advisories and best practices. With a few exceptions it was states and state governors who shut down business and went remote learning. And the response varied around the country. So it was actually elected officials making these calls. In his state, his governor Ron DeSantis was the one who made those decisions. Does he blame Ron DeSantis? I doubt it. But Fauci, hell yes. Does he blame Ron DeSantis for the excessive number of deaths in Florida after the vaccine came out? I doubt it. Not to mention that these things mostly occurred during Trump's presidency, but somehow this is all Democrats fault. This is what happens when the truth is so distorted through the media you consume.