The Trump Cabinet and key post thread (6 Viewers)

Users who are viewing this thread

I’ll concede that Fauci’s initial position against masks was not based on science. It was based on preventing a run on masks which would’ve hurt our medical providers, but name another instance that wasn’t based on science. I hope you understand that science is based on best evidence, but new evidence should result in adjusting positions.
The 6 foot rule.
 
That was based on research.
Fauci himself says otherwise. Under oath. Amazing thing testifying under oath under penalty of perjury. Memory improves.


Interesting read for you. Note Faucis testimony regarding the 6ft rule. Also masking kids.

How many billions of dollars were spent needlessly on a theory “that just appeared”? How many other directives and mandates were based on similar “science”.

In law, when someone lies about one thing, you can assume they are liars and lie about everything.
 
In law, when someone lies about one thing, you can assume they are liars and lie about everything.
If only you would apply this indiscriminately instead of defending and excusing Trump’s lies.

Plus, that testimony from Fauci - did you actually read a transcript or are you just repeating what you were told he said? I haven’t seen it in a bit, but my memory is that the GOP set out to discredit him, they twisted words and sometimes even lied about what he said.

One of the absolute worst things MAGA has done - and you seem to be aligning with MAGA in this case - is the smear of a good man and brilliant scientist in Fauci. He has served the public for decades honorably. These smears are despicable.
 
If only you would apply this indiscriminately instead of defending and excusing Trump’s lies.

Plus, that testimony from Fauci - did you actually read a transcript or are you just repeating what you were told he said? I haven’t seen it in a bit, but my memory is that the GOP set out to discredit him, they twisted words and sometimes even lied about what he said.

One of the absolute worst things MAGA has done - and you seem to be aligning with MAGA in this case - is the smear of a good man and brilliant scientist in Fauci. He has served the public for decades honorably. These smears are despicable.
Perhaps you should read the attachment. Did you read it?
 
Perhaps you should read the attachment. Did you read it?
Did you? I’m not interested in reading something from the radicals in the House GOP. A more sorry bunch of cowards, charlatans and liars does not exist. I saw some of it in real time, they’re despicable dishonest people.

I have been familiar with Fauci’s career for decades. I supervised a hospital lab through 3 different pandemics and/or disease events over the years. I read his works, I listened to his guidance pushed out to hospitals through the H1N1, Ebola scare, SARS scare, MERS scare.

Anyone who questions his motives and smears his character is just a pig of a person.
 
Fauci himself says otherwise. Under oath. Amazing thing testifying under oath under penalty of perjury. Memory improves.


Interesting read for you. Note Faucis testimony regarding the 6ft rule. Also masking kids.

How many billions of dollars were spent needlessly on a theory “that just appeared”? How many other directives and mandates were based on similar “science”.

In law, when someone lies about one thing, you can assume they are liars and lie about everything.

LOL - I knew you were going to bring that up. It's popular in right wing circles who get their news from the same sources. If you read the full transcript he did not say that ... in fact he said it was based empirically. And again, we aren't limited to soundbites - we can actually see the research for ourselves.

Original guidance from the WHO was three feet based on work in the 1930's done by William Wells for tuberculosis. As time went on, flu, SARS, MERS all seemed to behave similarly enough to keep that rule. Then in 2003 when the new SARS pandemic hit, the New England Journal of Medicine did another study that suggested that 3 feet wasn't enough and that 6 feet is better (https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa031349).

This is where the guidance came from. There was later evidence that the virus could travel even further.
 
LOL - I knew you were going to bring that up. It's popular in right wing circles who get their news from the same sources. If you read the full transcript he did not say that ... in fact he said it was based empirically. And again, we aren't limited to soundbites - we can actually see the research for ourselves.

Original guidance from the WHO was three feet based on work in the 1930's done by William Wells for tuberculosis. As time went on, flu, SARS, MERS all seemed to behave similarly enough to keep that rule. Then in 2003 when the new SARS pandemic hit, the New England Journal of Medicine did another study that suggested that 3 feet wasn't enough and that 6 feet is better (https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa031349).

This is where the guidance came from. There was later evidence that the virus could travel even further.
Thanks, I’m a bit under the weather and didn’t feel like running an errand to show him he is repeating lies. Damned lies about a good man.
 
President Donald Trump’s nominee to be the next FBI director, Kash Patel, claimed during his confirmation hearing on Thursday that he had never heard of a right-wing conspiracy theorist – before being reminded that he's appeared on his show eight times.

Patel arrived on Capitol Hill for his hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, where he was asked by ranking member DemocraticIllinois Sen. Dick Durbin about his knowledge of Stew Peters, a far-right podcaster.

“Are you familiar with Stew Peters?” Durbin asked.

“Not off the top of my head,” said Patel.

“You made eight separate appearances on his podcast,” said Durbin. “He promoted outrageous conspiracy theories and worked with a prominent neo-Nazi.”

“I'm just asking, when it comes to your association with individuals, why are so many of them in this category?” Durbin asked.

“My association, as you loosely define it, is by appearing in media over 1,000 times, to take on people who are putting on conspiratorial theories and to disavow them of their false impressions and to talk to them about the truth,” said Patel. “That is something that I will always continue to fight for.”……



 
Did you? I’m not interested in reading something from the radicals in the House GOP. A more sorry bunch of cowards, charlatans and liars does not exist. I saw some of it in real time, they’re despicable dishonest people.

I have been familiar with Fauci’s career for decades. I supervised a hospital lab through 3 different pandemics and/or disease events over the years. I read his works, I listened to his guidance pushed out to hospitals through the H1N1, Ebola scare, SARS scare, MERS scare.

Anyone who questions his motives and smears his character is just a pig of a person.
You may worship him if you choose. His testimony was under oath. So if the truth hurts, it is nothing compared what he put people thru based on a “theory” that “just appeared”. You didn’t even bother to read it. The 6 foot rule has its own section. What a brave soul you are.

You bust my chops because I don’t offer evidence to back up my opinions. And here you are. Ironic isn’t it?

Tell you what. Dig around and do some research and show me where Fauci denies his testimony on the 6 ft rule. Or masking kids.

I won’t hold my breath.

I find nothing admirable about the man. You may worship him if you choose.
 
You may worship him if you choose. His testimony was under oath. So if the truth hurts, it is nothing compared what he put people thru based on a “theory” that “just appeared”. You didn’t even bother to read it. The 6 foot rule has its own section. What a brave soul you are.

You bust my chops because I don’t offer evidence to back up my opinions. And here you are. Ironic isn’t it?

Tell you what. Dig around and do some research and show me where Fauci denies his testimony on the 6 ft rule. Or masking kids.

I won’t hold my breath.

I find nothing admirable about the man. You may worship him if you choose.

One week after that testimony he appeared at the House Select Sub Committee and said “I never said I made anything up.”
 
Last edited:
You may worship him if you choose. His testimony was under oath. So if the truth hurts, it is nothing compared what he put people thru based on a “theory” that “just appeared”. You didn’t even bother to read it. The 6 foot rule has its own section. What a brave soul you are.

You bust my chops because I don’t offer evidence to back up my opinions. And here you are. Ironic isn’t it?

Tell you what. Dig around and do some research and show me where Fauci denies his testimony on the 6 ft rule. Or masking kids.

I won’t hold my breath.

I find nothing admirable about the man. You may worship him if you choose.
You’re the one saying he lied - how about for once in your life you back up a claim you made? You have never backed up anything you say on here.

And quit putting words in my mouth. I never said I worshiped him - but what I do have is a couple of decades of familiarity with his work. And respect for a great scientist and a good man.

So you can take your fake news and lies about Fauci and put them someplace dark and humid.
 
You may worship him if you choose. His testimony was under oath. So if the truth hurts, it is nothing compared what he put people thru based on a “theory” that “just appeared”. You didn’t even bother to read it. The 6 foot rule has its own section. What a brave soul you are.

You bust my chops because I don’t offer evidence to back up my opinions. And here you are. Ironic isn’t it?

Tell you what. Dig around and do some research and show me where Fauci denies his testimony on the 6 ft rule. Or masking kids.

I won’t hold my breath.

I find nothing admirable about the man. You may worship him if you choose.
Why don’t you address the stuff UTJ is bringing up? He has the facts, which you are conveniently ignoring.

And MAGA bleats about not being sheep. Ridiculous hypocrisy.
 
The 6 foot rule.

It was based on research. Later scientists determined that 3 feet would be adequate, but they didn’t say social distancing wasn’t valuable. Here is a study in 2021 that found that 3 feet yielded similar benefits with masks.

Did you? I’m not interested in reading something from the radicals in the House GOP. A more sorry bunch of cowards, charlatans and liars does not exist. I saw some of it in real time, they’re despicable dishonest people.

I have been familiar with Fauci’s career for decades. I supervised a hospital lab through 3 different pandemics and/or disease events over the years. I read his works, I listened to his guidance pushed out to hospitals through the H1N1, Ebola scare, SARS scare, MERS scare.

Anyone who questions his motives and smears his character is just a pig of a person.
Fauci did say it appeared, and that it was the CDC’s recommendation based on previous studies of how viruses transmitted. It had to do with transmission by droplets vs aerosol. As they learned more about the transmission modes, they adjusted, as scientists are supposed to do. It’s a distortion from conservative to cast doubt on his integrity and the integrity of the vast majority of scientists that were doing the best they could to craft policy. It is this same type of agenda that caused overwhelming evidence on things like tobacco to be discounted.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

General News Feed

Fact Checkers News Feed

Back
Top Bottom