Supreme Court has voted to overturn abortion rights per draft opinion (Update: Dobbs opinion official) (1 Viewer)

Users who are viewing this thread

    Not long ago Kari Lake proclaimed Arizona's abortion law was a great law and wanted it the law of the state.

    Now that she has gotten her way, she is lobbying for it to be repealed.

    As I have been saying since 2022, the overwhelming vast majority of women aren't going to vote for the man who proudly boasts that he got rid of Roe V. Wade. Nor are those women going to vote for a forced birther politician.

    Turns out, republican belief in "pro life" was all just lies to get votes. Who is surprised? I sure am not.

    How many forced birthers will do the same about face?

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/ka ... r-BB1ltx3I.

    Arizona Republican Senate candidate Kari Lake is actively lobbying state lawmakers to overturn a 160-year-old law she once supported that bans abortion in almost all cases, a source with knowledge of her efforts told CNN.
     
    COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — Ohio was in the throes of a bitter debate over abortion rights this fall when Brittany Watts, 21 weeks and 5 days pregnant, began passing thick blood clots.

    The 33-year-old Watts, who had not shared the news of her pregnancy even with her family, made her first prenatal visit to a doctor’s office behind Mercy Health-St. Joseph’s Hospital in Warren, a working-class city about 60 miles (100 kilometers) southeast of Cleveland.

    The doctor said that, while a fetal heartbeat was still present, Watts’ water had broken prematurely and the fetus she was carrying would not survive. He advised heading to the hospital to have her labor induced, so she could have what amounted to an abortion to deliver the nonviable fetus. Otherwise, she would face “significant risk” of death, according to records of her case.

    That was a Tuesday in September. What followed was a harrowing three days entailing: multiple trips to the hospital; Watts miscarrying into, and then flushing and plunging, a toilet at her home; a police investigation of those actions; and Watts, who is Black, being charged with abuse of a corpse. That’s a fifth-degree felony punishable by up to a year in prison and a $2,500 fine.



    Her case was sent last month to a grand jury. It has touched off a national firestorm over the treatment of pregnant women, and especially Black women, in the aftermath of the U.S. Supreme Court’s Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision that overturned Roe v. Wade.

    Civil rights attorney Benjamin Crumpelevated Watts’ plight in a post to X, formerly Twitter, and supporters have donated more than $100,000 through GoFundMe for her legal defense, medical bills and trauma counseling.…..


    Brittany Watts, an Ohio woman who was charged with abuse of a corpse after having a miscarriage, has filed a federal lawsuit accusing some of the medical professionals who treated her of conspiring with a police officer to fabricate the criminal case against her.

    The lawsuit, which was filed last week and names the professionals, the officer, the hospital where Watts was treated and the city of Warren, Ohio, as defendants, is the latest development in a case that first made national headlines in late 2023 when Watts was first charged.

    Although a grand jury ultimately declined to move forward with the charge against Watts, the case sparked fears about how the fall of Roe v Wade and subsequent wave of abortion bans could endanger pregnant women and lead to police treating miscarriages as crimes.

    “This case is a perfect example of the broader implications of the overruling of Roe v Wadein the Dobbs case. Brittany was not seeking an abortion,” said Julia Rickert, one of Watts’s attorneys and a partner at the civil rights law firm Loevy and Loevy.

    “But the repercussions of the Dobbs decision meant that her pregnancy and her choices and her medical crisis were viewed in a different way.”……..

     
    A lawsuit that aims to restrict nationwide access to abortion pills can proceed, a federal judge in Texas ruled on Thursday, months after the US supreme court rebuked an earlier version of the lawsuit over a legal technicality.

    The US judge Matthew Kacsmaryk is allowing the attorneys general of Idaho, Kansas and Missouri to continue a case that takes aim at the FDA’s regulation of mifepristone, a drug typically used in medication abortions. Joe Biden’s department of justice had asked for the case to be dismissed, arguing that the attorneys general had no real link to Kacsmaryk’s court in the northern district of Texas.

    Kacsmaryk, a Donald Trump appointee, said in his ruling that it was too early in litigation to make that call.


    “Venue remains disputed here,” he wrote, “and should be properly dealt with at a phrase where each party may fully argue the issue.”

    The case could have sweeping implications for the availability of abortion across the country, as medication abortions account for more than two-thirds of all US abortions.

    The original version of the case, which was brought by a group of anti-abortion activists, sought to roll back the FDA’s 2000 approval of mifepristone – a request Kacsmaryk granted but was later paused by an appeals court. In later litigation, the activists asked courts to reverse more recent FDA rule-making around mifepristone, such as a policy that permits providers to dispense the drug through telehealth.

    Last year, the US supreme court ruled that the anti-abortion activists behind the case lacked the necessary standing to sue. Although the activists dismissed their case, Idaho, Kansas and Missouri attorneys general filed a 199-page complaint arguing for their right to take up the case in the activists’ stead.

    “This outrageous case should have been put to bed,” Julia Kaye, a senior staff attorney with the ACLU of Reproductive Freedom Project, said in a statement. “Instead, the same Texas judge who already tried to take mifepristone off the market nationwide has left the door open for extremist politicians to continue attacking medication abortion in his courtroom.”……..

     
    Donald Trump signed pardons for 23 anti-abortion activists who were convicted for violating a federal law that makes it a crime to block entrances to reproductive health clinics.

    The pardon list includes Lauren Handy, who is serving a nearly five-year prison sentence after forcing her way inside a Washington, D.C., clinic in 2020 and using ropes, bike blocks and chains to stop patients from entering — actions that anti-abortion groups and Republican officials have characterized as peaceful protests unjustly prosecuted by a politically motivated administration.

    Their convictions under the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act during Joe Biden’s presidency were fiercely condemned by anti-abortion organizations and right-wing legal groups, which pressed Trump for Thursday’s pardon……



     
    Legislators in at least four states have introduced bills this year that would change the legal definition of “homicide” to include abortion – proposals that pave the way for states to charge abortion patients with murder.

    Pregnancy Justice, a group that tracks these kinds of efforts, says it has recorded more “homicide” bills this year than ever before. Abortion bans have typically penalized providers, rather than patients.

    “That raises significant alarm – both that we’ve seen more than we have in the past in a single legislative session already, and that they’re not generating the level of outrage or attention or scrutiny that they have in years past,” said Dana Sussman, senior vice-president at Pregnancy Justice. “The more of these kinds of bills that get introduced, people get numb to the idea of them, and they seem less and less radical.”

    With Donald Trump returning to power in Washington DC, abortion rights supporters and opponents are waiting to see how the new president will handle one of the most divisive issues in US life.

    But red-state lawmakers have already filed a host of anti-abortion proposals over the last few weeks.

    In addition to the “homicide” bills, many of these bills target access to abortion pills – which account for more than 60% of US abortions – and seek tolimit minors’ ability to obtain abortions.

    In at least two states, Montana and Missouri, lawmakers are also seeking to implement legislation that would in effect roll back the abortion protections guaranteed by recent ballot measures.……

     
    Federal law (FACE Act) prohibits blocking abortion clinics and otherwise prohibits threats of violence and other intimidation against those attempting to enter a healthcare facility for an abortion.

    Trump's DOJ just announced that it would not longer prosecute FACE Act violations except in egregious cases - calling the DOJ's enforcement of this federal law to be "weaponization of the Justice Department"

     
    Federal law (FACE Act) prohibits blocking abortion clinics and otherwise prohibits threats of violence and other intimidation against those attempting to enter a healthcare facility for an abortion.

    Trump's DOJ just announced that it would not longer prosecute FACE Act violations except in egregious cases - calling the DOJ's enforcement of this federal law to be "weaponization of the Justice Department"


    They really are going after everything in Project 2025 and beyond.

    And all of the "They won't do that :poop:" people just keeping quiet, with their head down and saying nothing now because it won't affect them.
     
    Last edited:
    Donald Trump on Friday signed an executive order reinstating a federal rule known as the “Mexico City policy” which halts US aid from flowing to groups that provide abortion services, counsel people about the procedure or advocate for abortion rights overseas.

    The policy, which was first instituted by Ronald Reagan in 1984, is typically implemented whenever a Republican president wins the White House and rescinded whenever a Democrat wins. But this whiplash has major implications for abortion and reproductive healthcare around the world.

    Historically, the revival of the Mexico City policy affects up to about $600m of international aid. During his first term, however, Trump dramatically expanded the scope of the Mexico city policy, which abortion rights supporters call a “global gag rule”. Rather than applying the policy only to family planning assistance, as was typical, the Trump administration applied to it to assistance for organizations that offer a range of health services around the globe – leading the policy to affect billions of dollars’ worth of aid.


    According to the Guttmacher Institute, which tracks abortion restrictions and their impact, the policy can cut off access to contraception, lead women to seek out unsafe abortions and cause tumult within the non-governmental groups that depend on US aid to keep their programs going.

    “Reinstating the Mexico City policy will have deadly consequences for people across the globe,” Rebecca Hart Holder, president of Reproductive Equity Now, said in a statement.………

     
    Donald Trump on Friday signed an executive order reinstating a federal rule known as the “Mexico City policy” which halts US aid from flowing to groups that provide abortion services, counsel people about the procedure or advocate for abortion rights overseas.

    The policy, which was first instituted by Ronald Reagan in 1984, is typically implemented whenever a Republican president wins the White House and rescinded whenever a Democrat wins. But this whiplash has major implications for abortion and reproductive healthcare around the world.

    Historically, the revival of the Mexico City policy affects up to about $600m of international aid. During his first term, however, Trump dramatically expanded the scope of the Mexico city policy, which abortion rights supporters call a “global gag rule”. Rather than applying the policy only to family planning assistance, as was typical, the Trump administration applied to it to assistance for organizations that offer a range of health services around the globe – leading the policy to affect billions of dollars’ worth of aid.


    According to the Guttmacher Institute, which tracks abortion restrictions and their impact, the policy can cut off access to contraception, lead women to seek out unsafe abortions and cause tumult within the non-governmental groups that depend on US aid to keep their programs going.

    “Reinstating the Mexico City policy will have deadly consequences for people across the globe,” Rebecca Hart Holder, president of Reproductive Equity Now, said in a statement.………

    Because they basically want to make women second class citizens again.
     
    Madison Clark did not celebrate when Donald Trump won the 2024 election. But one thought gave her solace: “At least I don’t have to worry about having a baby.”

    In September, Clark, a 24-year-old nursing student from Battle Creek, Michigan, underwent a bilateralsalpingectomy, a sterilization procedure that removed her fallopian tubes, ensuring she will never get pregnant.

    Clark considers the procedure her fail-safe against any further rollbacks of reproductive rights that might occur under the new Trump administration.

    Clark had always known she didn’t want to have children. “I just don’t personally see myself on that path,” she said. In 2022, when she learned she was pregnant, she got an abortion.

    But that same year, the supreme court overturned Roe v Wade with its decision in Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization, leading Clark to seriously consider permanent contraception.

    She’s not the only one.

    A study published this month in the Health Affairs journal found that among young adults aged 19 to 26, tubal sterilization visits increased 70% after May 2022 – when the Dobbs decision leaked – in states likely to ban abortion.

    Tubal ligation, known as getting one’s “tubes tied”, involves cutting or blocking the fallopian tubes with clamps.

    A salpingectomy for permanent birth control, like Clark received, removes both fallopian tubes altogether………



     
    Madison Clark did not celebrate when Donald Trump won the 2024 election. But one thought gave her solace: “At least I don’t have to worry about having a baby.”

    In September, Clark, a 24-year-old nursing student from Battle Creek, Michigan, underwent a bilateralsalpingectomy, a sterilization procedure that removed her fallopian tubes, ensuring she will never get pregnant.
    well till that's stopped too. Can't have those baby farms stop producing them future indentured servents.
     
    Ah yes, the old 'it was a joke' defense.
    According to a statement on the Anglican Catholic church’s website, Robinson’s license in the church was subsequently revoked and he will no longer serve as a priest.

    “We believe that those who mimic the Nazi salute, even as a joke or an attempt to troll their opponents, trivialize the horror of the Holocaust and diminish the sacrifice of those who fought against its perpetrators,” the statement reads. “Such actions are harmful, divisive, and contrary to the tenets of Christian charity.”

    Robinson posted a statement on his Facebook page on Wednesday defending the gesture as “a joke” in “mockery of the hysterical ‘liberals’ who called Elon Musk a Nazi for quite clearly showing the audience his heart was with them”.
     
    Federal law (FACE Act) prohibits blocking abortion clinics and otherwise prohibits threats of violence and other intimidation against those attempting to enter a healthcare facility for an abortion.

    Trump's DOJ just announced that it would not longer prosecute FACE Act violations except in egregious cases - calling the DOJ's enforcement of this federal law to be "weaponization of the Justice Department"

    What options does that leave clinics that are blockaded? What if they enter the clinics like some of these did?
     
    What options does that leave clinics that are blockaded? What if they enter the clinics like some of these did?

    Not totally sure what you mean by options but they continue to have legal rights under state law - including trespass, etc. - and some states might even have specific legal protections for clinics. Federal intervention in that context is not ordinarily justified anyway absent special authority, and that’s what this specific act granted.
     
    U.S. Senator Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) is spiking the football after the Pentagon’s reversal of its policy allowing taxpayer-funded travel for abortion services, a policy he spent nearly a year blocking military promotions over.

    In a statement, Tuberville celebrated the decision, saying it justified his fight against the policy, which included his controversial hold on hundreds of military promotions in 2023.

    “For the past two years, I have been sounding the alarm about the Pentagon’s illegal and immoral practice of using taxpayer dollars to fund abortions,” Tuberville declared. “I took a lot of heat when I stood alone for nearly a year in holding senior Pentagon promotions over this—but as of today, it was all worth it.”

    He went on to praise President Donald Trump and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth for bringing what he called ‘common sense’ back to the Pentagon.

    “The Biden administration treated taxpayers like their own personal piggy bank that they could use to bankroll their woke agenda,” Tuberville continued. “Under President Trump and Secretary Hegseth’s leadership, the Pentagon will once again be focused on lethality, not pushing a political agenda.”

    The Pentagon’s now-reversed abortion travel policy was originally introduced by the Biden administration in 2022 following the Supreme Court’s Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision, which overturned Roe v. Wade. The policy allowed service members and their dependents to travel across state lines for abortion services at taxpayer expense in states where the procedure remained legal.............

    Alabama Sen. Tuberville ‘Spikes The Ball’ After Pentagon’s Reversal Of Abortion Travel Policy

     

    Create an account or login to comment

    You must be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create account

    Create an account on our community. It's easy!

    Log in

    Already have an account? Log in here.

    General News Feed

    Fact Checkers News Feed

    Back
    Top Bottom