Supreme Court has voted to overturn abortion rights per draft opinion (Update: Dobbs opinion official) (1 Viewer)

Users who are viewing this thread

    Not long ago Kari Lake proclaimed Arizona's abortion law was a great law and wanted it the law of the state.

    Now that she has gotten her way, she is lobbying for it to be repealed.

    As I have been saying since 2022, the overwhelming vast majority of women aren't going to vote for the man who proudly boasts that he got rid of Roe V. Wade. Nor are those women going to vote for a forced birther politician.

    Turns out, republican belief in "pro life" was all just lies to get votes. Who is surprised? I sure am not.

    How many forced birthers will do the same about face?

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/ka ... r-BB1ltx3I.

    Arizona Republican Senate candidate Kari Lake is actively lobbying state lawmakers to overturn a 160-year-old law she once supported that bans abortion in almost all cases, a source with knowledge of her efforts told CNN.
     
    Some of the anti-abortion activists pardoned by President Donald Trump are already planning a new wave of civil disobedience, according to a report.

    The president issued pardons in January to activists who had broken into and blocked access to abortion clinics.

    The anti-abortion group LiveAction recently held an online event, where a number of the activists released from federal prison said they would take up their efforts to close theremaining clinics available in the U.S., according to Politico……


     
    After ProPublica did its first article on the deaths in GA due to the anti-abortion law, Kemp turned over the membership of the medical board that evaluated the cases and assigned the cause for these maternal deaths. And even though the members of that medical board used to be public like any other appointed board in the state, now Kemp refuses to divulge who he put on the board. I’m quite sure there will never be another maternal death attributed to the anti-abortion law, which is the intended result.

     
    After ProPublica did its first article on the deaths in GA due to the anti-abortion law, Kemp turned over the membership of the medical board that evaluated the cases and assigned the cause for these maternal deaths. And even though the members of that medical board used to be public like any other appointed board in the state, now Kemp refuses to divulge who he put on the board. I’m quite sure there will never be another maternal death attributed to the anti-abortion law, which is the intended result.



    But transparency and accountability ....... :rolleyes:
     
    The Trump administration fired off a series of dramatic attacks on abortion rights on Tuesday, as it signaled its plan to drop out of a case defending access to emergency abortions while asking the US supreme court for permission to join a case against the abortion provider Planned Parenthood.

    The justice department said it would move to dismiss the case over emergency abortions, which had been originally filed by the Biden administration, according to court papers filed by the largest hospital network in Idaho.

    The Biden administration had sued Idaho over its near-total abortion ban, which it accused of running afoul of a federal law that protects patients’ right to health care in emergencies.

    The dismissal could come as soon as Wednesday, St Luke’s Health System wrote in a court filing. The hospital has previously said that Idaho’s ban forced its providers to fly women out of state for emergency care.


    Meanwhile, the Trump administration has filed paperwork asking the US supreme court to let it join the upcoming oral arguments in a case over South Carolina’s attempt to eradicate Medicaid funding for medical services offered by Planned Parenthood.

    Although it is already illegal to use federal dollars to pay for abortions, South Carolina’s Republican governor, Henry McMaster, ordered the state department of health to block Planned Parenthood from Medicaid because, McMaster said, “payment of taxpayer funds to abortion clinics, for any purpose, results in the subsidy of abortion and the denial of the right to life”.

    The Trump administration hopes to help defend South Carolina’s actions, asking for 10 minutes of the April oral arguments’ running time. South Carolina is being represented by Alliance Defending Freedom, a powerhouse Christian legal group that was the architect of much of the conservative attack on abortion and LGBTQ+ rights……

     
    There’s a small, unremarkable beige building in downtown Casper, the heart of Wyoming’s oil country, tucked between a Sinclair gas station and a local dry cleaner. Most days of the week, the building attracts a small throng of protesters.

    In May 2022, it was burned down just three weeks before a new business was set to open in the building. Since it finally opened in 2023, Wyoming lawmakers have passed a number of laws designed specifically to shut it down.

    Wyoming’s 2025 legislative session, which has just ended, has brought them closer than ever to succeeding in obstructing the work of Wellspring Health Access, the state’s only full-service abortion clinic.

    Near-total abortion bans went into effect in Wyoming after the US supreme court overturned Roe v Wade in 2022, but a Wyoming district court judge overturned the bans last year citing the state’s constitutionally guaranteed right to healthcare access. The case – brought by Wellspring – is currently in the hands of the Wyoming supreme court.

    Due to an injunction, Wellspring was able to operate during the prolonged legal battle. That changed last week, when the conservative legislature passed a law requiring facilities providing in-clinic abortions meet the regulatory requirements of ambulatory surgical centers, which have entirely different building codes and regulations, requiring a prohibitively expensive relocation.

    The law would also require doctors to have admitting privileges at a hospital within 10 miles, which is more stringent than its codes for ambulatory surgical centers.……:

     
    Would they rule in such a way? Since it revolves around abortion I would say it is likely they would. The SCOTUS as currently compromised is incompetent. That was shown with the Chevron decision. To think that congress which is not comprised of people who are experts in virtually anything is capable of passing individual laws regarding the complex system which is the environment simply underscores the lack of intelligence that the conservative majority has.
     

    Create an account or login to comment

    You must be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create account

    Create an account on our community. It's easy!

    Log in

    Already have an account? Log in here.

    General News Feed

    Fact Checkers News Feed

    Back
    Top Bottom