superchuck500
U.S. Blues
Offline
Trump and Eastman appear to be preparing to be indicted. It’s probably better to have a new, separate thread for this case.
Special Counsel January 6 conspiracy case against Trump in DC (Update: Trial set for March 4, 2024) (1 Viewer)
- Thread startersuperchuck500
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
Users who are viewing this thread
Ex-Chief of Staff Mark Meadows granted immunity, tells special counsel he warned Trump about 2020 claims: Sources
Former President Donald Trump's final chief of staff in the White House, Mark Meadows, has spoken with special counsel Jack Smith's team at least three times this year, including once before a federal grand jury, which came only after Smith granted Meadows immunity to testify under oath...
fooferdoggie
Well-known member
Offline
as soon as rudy the melter falls its game over for the orange cheeto. its fun watching this.
Bigdaddysaints
Well-known member
Offline
you'll see all the ones who are for plea deals to convict other criminals be completely against plea deals for testimonies against Trump. all of a sudden they'll say they are all part of the witch hunt .
Optimus Prime
Well-known member
Offline
Donald Trump has lashed out at his former chief of staff Mark Meadows after it emerged that he has reportedly been granted immunity in exchange for cooperating with prosecutors in the federal criminal case charging the former president over his efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election.
“I don’t think Mark Meadows would lie about the Rigged and Stollen 2020 Presidential Election merely for getting IMMUNITY against Prosecution (PERSECUTION!) by Deranged Prosecutor, Jack Smith,” the former president wrote on Truth Social late on Tuesday night.
“BUT, when you really think about it, after being hounded like a dog for three years, told you’ll be going to jail for the rest of your life, your money and your family will be forever gone, and we’re not at all interested in exposing those that did the RIGGING — If you say BAD THINGS about that terrible “MONSTER,” DONALD J. TRUMP, we won’t put you in prison, you can keep your family and your wealth, and, perhaps, if you can make up some really horrible “STUFF” a out him, we may very well erect a statue of you in the middle of our decaying and now very violent Capital, Washington, D.C.
“Some people would make that deal, but they are weaklings and cowards, and so bad for the future our Failing Nation. I don’t think that Mark Meadows is one of them, but who really knows? MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!”
In a follow-up post, he added: “Mark Meadows NEVER told me that allegations of significant fraud (about the RIGGED Election!) were baseless. He certainly didn’t say that in his book!”……..
www.the-independent.com
“I don’t think Mark Meadows would lie about the Rigged and Stollen 2020 Presidential Election merely for getting IMMUNITY against Prosecution (PERSECUTION!) by Deranged Prosecutor, Jack Smith,” the former president wrote on Truth Social late on Tuesday night.
“BUT, when you really think about it, after being hounded like a dog for three years, told you’ll be going to jail for the rest of your life, your money and your family will be forever gone, and we’re not at all interested in exposing those that did the RIGGING — If you say BAD THINGS about that terrible “MONSTER,” DONALD J. TRUMP, we won’t put you in prison, you can keep your family and your wealth, and, perhaps, if you can make up some really horrible “STUFF” a out him, we may very well erect a statue of you in the middle of our decaying and now very violent Capital, Washington, D.C.
“Some people would make that deal, but they are weaklings and cowards, and so bad for the future our Failing Nation. I don’t think that Mark Meadows is one of them, but who really knows? MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!”
In a follow-up post, he added: “Mark Meadows NEVER told me that allegations of significant fraud (about the RIGGED Election!) were baseless. He certainly didn’t say that in his book!”……..
Trump lashes out at Meadows as ‘he’s granted immunity in Jan 6 case’
ABC News confirms The Independent reporting on ex-chief of staff’s immunity deal
www.the-independent.com
This is witness tampering.Donald Trump has lashed out at his former chief of staff Mark Meadows after it emerged that he has reportedly been granted immunity in exchange for cooperating with prosecutors in the federal criminal case charging the former president over his efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election.
“I don’t think Mark Meadows would lie about the Rigged and Stollen 2020 Presidential Election merely for getting IMMUNITY against Prosecution (PERSECUTION!) by Deranged Prosecutor, Jack Smith,” the former president wrote on Truth Social late on Tuesday night.
“BUT, when you really think about it, after being hounded like a dog for three years, told you’ll be going to jail for the rest of your life, your money and your family will be forever gone, and we’re not at all interested in exposing those that did the RIGGING — If you say BAD THINGS about that terrible “MONSTER,” DONALD J. TRUMP, we won’t put you in prison, you can keep your family and your wealth, and, perhaps, if you can make up some really horrible “STUFF” a out him, we may very well erect a statue of you in the middle of our decaying and now very violent Capital, Washington, D.C.
“Some people would make that deal, but they are weaklings and cowards, and so bad for the future our Failing Nation. I don’t think that Mark Meadows is one of them, but who really knows? MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!”
In a follow-up post, he added: “Mark Meadows NEVER told me that allegations of significant fraud (about the RIGGED Election!) were baseless. He certainly didn’t say that in his book!”……..
Trump lashes out at Meadows as ‘he’s granted immunity in Jan 6 case’
ABC News confirms The Independent reporting on ex-chief of staff’s immunity deal
- Thread starter
- #366
OP
OP
superchuck500
U.S. Blues
Offline
It would have violated Judge Chutkin's protective order had it been left in place.
efil4
Well-known member
Offline
it was lifted? ( the gag order )
Taurus
Well-known member
Offline
Why is this twatwaffle still walking around?
Stick him in Camp David with no phone and an ankle bracelet.
If you want to play 4d chess, let the Russians know where he is and that if they want him, they can have him.
Trump would absolutely take that deal. Stay in the US facing prosecution or live out his life in posh comfort at Putin's mansion? No contest.
It would be absolutely hilarious to watch the GOP bootlickers contort themselves into supporting him. Because they would. Because they have no one else. Trump mixes cocaine into his shoeshine formula.
Stick him in Camp David with no phone and an ankle bracelet.
If you want to play 4d chess, let the Russians know where he is and that if they want him, they can have him.
Trump would absolutely take that deal. Stay in the US facing prosecution or live out his life in posh comfort at Putin's mansion? No contest.
It would be absolutely hilarious to watch the GOP bootlickers contort themselves into supporting him. Because they would. Because they have no one else. Trump mixes cocaine into his shoeshine formula.
coldseat
Well-known member
Offline
It was temporarily halted by Judge Chutkan pending appeal
FullMonte
Well-known member
Offline
Looks like NBC/Universal is trying to get Trump's DC election interference trial televised, and the judge did not dismiss it outright. Instead, the judge has given Trump until Nov 10 to respond before ruling.
NBC's argument is essentially that Trump is accused of trying to suppress millions of Americans' right to vote, and he is running for the presidential nomination. If the trial is televised, the american voting public will have to rely on second and third hand reports about what happened in court, and they will be deprived of the ability to watch it for themselves and determine what happened.
I think it's a compelling argument, but I'm no lawyer, and I don't know about how and what goes in to overriding a rule like "cameras are not allowed in federal courts." On the flip side, even Trump's response will be good information. I can't imagine ANY opposition that will come off as anything other than "I don't want the american voters to see the truth."
www.reuters.com
NBC's argument is essentially that Trump is accused of trying to suppress millions of Americans' right to vote, and he is running for the presidential nomination. If the trial is televised, the american voting public will have to rely on second and third hand reports about what happened in court, and they will be deprived of the ability to watch it for themselves and determine what happened.
I think it's a compelling argument, but I'm no lawyer, and I don't know about how and what goes in to overriding a rule like "cameras are not allowed in federal courts." On the flip side, even Trump's response will be good information. I can't imagine ANY opposition that will come off as anything other than "I don't want the american voters to see the truth."
US judge asks Trump if he wants his federal election trial televised
A U.S. judge on Friday asked former President Donald Trump whether he wants to appear on television when he stands trial in federal court on charges of attempting to overturn his 2020 election defeat.
- Thread starter
- #373
OP
OP
superchuck500
U.S. Blues
Offline
fooferdoggie
Well-known member
Offline
hope they used an industrial gag with a lock.
fooferdoggie
Well-known member
Offline
coming from the guy who only hires the very best.
coldseat
Well-known member
Offline
Yeah, but that was after his failed coup attempt. Not sure how much impact it will have on the other two cases, since he could easily argue that at that point he had accepted that the election would be stolen from him. I don't think it will matter though, they have a lot of evidence already.
Create an account or login to comment
You must be a member in order to leave a comment
Create account
Create an account on our community. It's easy!
Log in
Already have an account? Log in here.