Special Counsel January 6 conspiracy case against Trump in DC (Update: Trial set for March 4, 2024) (1 Viewer)

[superchuck500]

Trump and Eastman appear to be preparing to be indicted. It’s probably better to have a new, separate thread for this case.

 

[MT15]

WH Secret Service under Trump needs investigated.

 

[MT15]

Specifically the Secret Service was communicating with Stewart Rhodes, recently convicted of sedition and sentenced to 20 (?) years.

Biden’s dogs were right to be suspicious of the WH Secret Service, it seems.

 

[DaveXA]

Specifically the Secret Service was communicating with Stewart Rhodes, recently convicted of sedition and sentenced to 20 (?) years.

Biden’s dogs were right to be suspicious of the WH Secret Service, it seems.

If any of them who were friendly and shared any sort of Intel that aided the insurrection, they need to go straight to jail.

 

[coldseat]

Specifically the Secret Service was communicating with Stewart Rhodes, recently convicted of sedition and sentenced to 20 (?) years.

Biden’s dogs were right to be suspicious of the WH Secret Service, it seems.

Yeah, I hope Biden cleaned house at the SS. They were very shady under Trump.

 

[MT15]

If any of them who were friendly and shared any sort of Intel that aided the insurrection, they need to go straight to jail.

So far I don’t think there was any intel shared but they were certainly friendly to him.

 

[DaveXA]

So far I don’t think there was any intel shared but they were certainly friendly to him.

Yeah, if it's just friendly in a normal friendly way, I wouldn't read anything into that. What I can't accept is if they provided any material, logistical or Intel support them. Just being friends or friendly is what it is.

 

[MT15]

Yeah, if it's just friendly in a normal friendly way, I wouldn't read anything into that. What I can't accept is if they provided any material, logistical or Intel support them. Just being friends or friendly is what it is.

One of the SS agents described himself as the unofficial (but inching closer to official) liaison to the Oath Keepers. They all seemed to look at the organization very favorably and didn‘t recognize the true nature of the organization at all. Seemed very sympathetic toward them.

 

[DaveXA]

One of the SS agents described himself as the unofficial (but inching closer to official) liaison to the Oath Keepers. They all seemed to look at the organization very favorably and didn‘t recognize the true nature of the organization at all. Seemed very sympathetic toward them.

Yeah, I don't know. The devil is gonna be in the details on this.

 

[superchuck500]

 

[superchuck500]

 

[MT15]

I’m thinking that’s a very reasonable timeline for this trial.

 

[J-DONK]

Yeah, I don't know. The devil is gonna be in the details on this.

The SS deleted all of their data instead of handing it over. We should have already known all of this. The fact they were communicating with private citizens like this. What was being said via intra-department communication?

 

[efil4]

Hey Lauro- think of all the billable hours you can send invoices for!

( that will never get paid )

Wagon hitched. Best of luck.

 

[Optimus Prime]

 

[GrandAdmiral]

"Stunningly stupid..." (per the video)

Trump cited the ‘Scottsboro Boys’ case when he asked for a 2026 trial. Judge Chutkan rejected any comparison | CNN Politics

When Donald Trump urged the judge in his federal election subversion case to set his trial for April 2026 earlier this month, he cited a landmark Supreme Court decision concerning the infamous 1931 Scottsboro Boys cases to bolster his argument that special counsel Jack Smith isn’t giving him...

www.cnn.com

 

[fooferdoggie]

"Stunningly stupid..." (per the video)

Trump cited the ‘Scottsboro Boys’ case when he asked for a 2026 trial. Judge Chutkan rejected any comparison | CNN Politics

When Donald Trump urged the judge in his federal election subversion case to set his trial for April 2026 earlier this month, he cited a landmark Supreme Court decision concerning the infamous 1931 Scottsboro Boys cases to bolster his argument that special counsel Jack Smith isn’t giving him...

www.cnn.com

when you have shirt for lawyers this is what you get. its exactly what he deserves too.

 

[DJ1BigTymer]

"Stunningly stupid..." (per the video)

Trump cited the ‘Scottsboro Boys’ case when he asked for a 2026 trial. Judge Chutkan rejected any comparison | CNN Politics

When Donald Trump urged the judge in his federal election subversion case to set his trial for April 2026 earlier this month, he cited a landmark Supreme Court decision concerning the infamous 1931 Scottsboro Boys cases to bolster his argument that special counsel Jack Smith isn’t giving him...

www.cnn.com

Very intentional though. It was an attempt to draw out a visceral response rather than a logical one so that they can attempt to attack the judge as being biased against trump. Fail. I expect more of the same from trump and his crew.

 

[MT15]

the least shocking story of the month - so far, lol. I mean, everyone knew this, right?