Special Counsel January 6 conspiracy case against Trump in DC (Update: Trial set for March 4, 2024) (2 Viewers)

Thread Attachment browser

Users who are viewing this thread

    Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)
    Specifically the Secret Service was communicating with Stewart Rhodes, recently convicted of sedition and sentenced to 20 (?) years.

    Biden’s dogs were right to be suspicious of the WH Secret Service, it seems.
     
    MT15 said:
    Specifically the Secret Service was communicating with Stewart Rhodes, recently convicted of sedition and sentenced to 20 (?) years.

    Biden’s dogs were right to be suspicious of the WH Secret Service, it seems.
    Click to expand...
    If any of them who were friendly and shared any sort of Intel that aided the insurrection, they need to go straight to jail.
     
    MT15 said:
    Specifically the Secret Service was communicating with Stewart Rhodes, recently convicted of sedition and sentenced to 20 (?) years.

    Biden’s dogs were right to be suspicious of the WH Secret Service, it seems.
    Click to expand...

    Yeah, I hope Biden cleaned house at the SS. They were very shady under Trump.
     
    DaveXA said:
    If any of them who were friendly and shared any sort of Intel that aided the insurrection, they need to go straight to jail.
    Click to expand...
    So far I don’t think there was any intel shared but they were certainly friendly to him.
     
    MT15 said:
    So far I don’t think there was any intel shared but they were certainly friendly to him.
    Click to expand...

    Yeah, if it's just friendly in a normal friendly way, I wouldn't read anything into that. What I can't accept is if they provided any material, logistical or Intel support them. Just being friends or friendly is what it is.
     
    DaveXA said:
    Yeah, if it's just friendly in a normal friendly way, I wouldn't read anything into that. What I can't accept is if they provided any material, logistical or Intel support them. Just being friends or friendly is what it is.
    Click to expand...
    One of the SS agents described himself as the unofficial (but inching closer to official) liaison to the Oath Keepers. They all seemed to look at the organization very favorably and didn‘t recognize the true nature of the organization at all. Seemed very sympathetic toward them.
     
    MT15 said:
    One of the SS agents described himself as the unofficial (but inching closer to official) liaison to the Oath Keepers. They all seemed to look at the organization very favorably and didn‘t recognize the true nature of the organization at all. Seemed very sympathetic toward them.
    Click to expand...
    Yeah, I don't know. The devil is gonna be in the details on this.
     
    I’m thinking that’s a very reasonable timeline for this trial.
     
    DaveXA said:
    Yeah, I don't know. The devil is gonna be in the details on this.
    Click to expand...

    The SS deleted all of their data instead of handing it over. We should have already known all of this. The fact they were communicating with private citizens like this. What was being said via intra-department communication?
     
    GrandAdmiral said:
    "Stunningly stupid..." (per the video)

    www.cnn.com

    Trump cited the ‘Scottsboro Boys’ case when he asked for a 2026 trial. Judge Chutkan rejected any comparison | CNN Politics

    When Donald Trump urged the judge in his federal election subversion case to set his trial for April 2026 earlier this month, he cited a landmark Supreme Court decision concerning the infamous 1931 Scottsboro Boys cases to bolster his argument that special counsel Jack Smith isn’t giving him...
    www.cnn.com www.cnn.com
    Click to expand...
    when you have shirt for lawyers this is what you get. its exactly what he deserves too.
     
    GrandAdmiral said:
    "Stunningly stupid..." (per the video)

    www.cnn.com

    Trump cited the ‘Scottsboro Boys’ case when he asked for a 2026 trial. Judge Chutkan rejected any comparison | CNN Politics

    When Donald Trump urged the judge in his federal election subversion case to set his trial for April 2026 earlier this month, he cited a landmark Supreme Court decision concerning the infamous 1931 Scottsboro Boys cases to bolster his argument that special counsel Jack Smith isn’t giving him...
    www.cnn.com www.cnn.com
    Click to expand...
    Very intentional though. It was an attempt to draw out a visceral response rather than a logical one so that they can attempt to attack the judge as being biased against trump. Fail. I expect more of the same from trump and his crew.
     

    Create an account or login to comment

    You must be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create account

    Create an account on our community. It's easy!

    Register

    Log in

    Already have an account? Log in here.

    Share this page

    General News Feed

    Fact Checkers News Feed

    Back
    Top Bottom