QAnon (2 Viewers)

Users who are viewing this thread

    Dragon

    Well-known member
    Staff member
    Joined
    Sep 28, 2019
    Messages
    1,296
    Reaction score
    2,493
    Age
    61
    Location
    Elsinore,Denmark
    Offline
    This organisation and its reach is seriously scary. When the head of the New York Police Department's second-largest police union openly shows his support of this "organisation" then something is seriously wrong!


    The head of the New York Police Department's second-largest police union gave a television interview Friday afternoon while sitting in front of a mug emblazoned with QAnon imagery and slogans.

    The mug behind Mullins featured the word "QANON" and the hashtag #WWG1WGA, which stands for "where we go one, we go all," a popular slogan among QAnon supporters. At the center of the mug was a large letter Q, which refers to a supposed government insider who, according to QAnon supporters, posts cryptic clues on the Internet about the "deep state."


    More than a year ago, the FBI reportedly assessed that QAnon was a dangerous movement that was likely to inspire its most extreme members to commit violent acts of domestic terrorism.


    In recent weeks, QAnon supporters have been posting videos of themselves reciting an oath and repeating the "where we go one, we go all" catchphrase that is seen on the mug. They say they are preparing "digital soldiers" for an apocalyptic reckoning, when thousands of "deep state" pedophiles will be arrested and prosecuted at military courts at Guantanamo Bay.



    https://us.cnn.com/2020/07/17/us/head-nypd-union-qanon-mug/index.html
     
    I’m out of this thread, as the people communicating with me are disingenuous in their interactions.
     
    This is a game that some of you seem to play. Please point to my misrepresentation.

    If his statement was not implying that people who follow Q at first don’t intend to commit a violent act, but eventually do commit a violent act. Then yes I misrepresented what he was implying. But this is exactly what he was selling……and he got called out on it.

    And then we get into a page of people covering for him and not answering the initial question that was asked.

    I may need to go back and read the TOS again. I must be doing this wrong.

    I did, as did Sam. You claimed to understand his point, yet you misrepresented it. You are either admitting to the use of strawman arguments or you were lying when you said you understood his point.
     
    For the 10th time.

    I say 10s of millions of Q followers.
    Sam says they are are radicalized on their way to violence.

    Show me the violence of even 100
    People of the millions that are radicalized.

    Y’all are either purposely avoiding the answers or purposely twisting my post to creative a fitting narrative. Either way, it’s easy to see why this place is the way it is.
     
    For the 10th time.

    I say 10s of millions of Q followers.
    Sam says they are are radicalized on their way to violence.

    Show me the violence of even 100
    People of the millions that are radicalized.

    Y’all are either purposely avoiding the answers or purposely twisting my post to creative a fitting narrative. Either way, it’s easy to see why this place is the way it is.
    Are there 10s of millions of Qanon followers? You keep saying that as if it's a fact.

    Also, do you know what Q anon followers believe?
     
    Are there 10s of millions of Qanon followers? You keep saying that as if it's a fact.

    Also, do you know what Q anon followers believe?
    I will answer as soon as you validate your statements of radicalization. Or just admit to using hyperbole on an issue that is used as a rallying point for the left.

    According to this, a little over 8 million ot 2.7% of the population.
     
    Last edited:
    I will answer as soon as you validate your statements of radicalization. Or just admit to using hyperbole on an issue that is used as a rallying point for the left.
    I have already, may times.

    There isn't any way to believe in Qanon without being radicalized. They believe that people are stealing babies for cannibalism. If someone believes that and isn't willing to commit violence, they are a bad person.
     
    I have already, may times.

    There isn't any way to believe in Qanon without being radicalized. They believe that people are stealing babies for cannibalism. If someone believes that and isn't willing to commit violence, they are a bad person.
    Thanks for admitting that you were using hyperbole to make a point. And then 3 or 4 of your buddies tried to cover for you.

    So none to very little violence has occurred outside of January 6 by Q followers that has been reported or documented correct.
     
    Thanks for admitting that you were using hyperbole to make a point. And then 3 or 4 of your buddies tried to cover for you.

    So none to very little violence has occurred outside of January 6 by Q followers that has been reported or documented correct.
    What part of what i said was hyperbole?

    You either have no idea what Qanon is all about, or believe in it.
     
    For the 10th time.

    I say 10s of millions of Q followers.
    Sam says they are are radicalized on their way to violence.

    Show me the violence of even 100
    People of the millions that are radicalized.

    Y’all are either purposely avoiding the answers or purposely twisting my post to creative a fitting narrative. Either way, it’s easy to see why this place is the way it is.

    Sam's statement:

    "Most of the Q people who become willing to commit violence don't start out willing."

    This is not the same thing as "most of the Q people commit violence."
     
    Sam's statement:

    "Most of the Q people who become willing to commit violence don't start out willing."

    This is not the same thing as "most of the Q people commit violence."
    Give me proof of his statement. If we are talking about the handful of crimes committed by purple who follow Q, great. I just don’t think those few incidents give reason for saying a group of people are radicalized and become violent.

    The left makes Q followers out to be a group with propensity for violence. Just looking for the info to back up the narrative.

    This should be an easy task. If the Q followers are not violent, just say they are a bunch of quack pots that are in their basement looking at crazy websites. Don’t mischaracterize to try and further the agenda.
     
    Give me proof of his statement. If we are talking about the handful of crimes committed by purple who follow Q, great. I just don’t think those few incidents give reason for saying a group of people are radicalized and become violent.

    The left makes Q followers out to be a group with propensity for violence. Just looking for the info to back up the narrative.

    This should be an easy task. If the Q followers are not violent, just say they are a bunch of quack pots that are in their basement looking at crazy websites. Don’t mischaracterize to try and further the agenda.
    Well, anyone who isn't willing to commit acts of violence to save children from cannibalism is a pretty terrible person.
     

    Create an account or login to comment

    You must be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create account

    Create an account on our community. It's easy!

    Log in

    Already have an account? Log in here.

    General News Feed

    Fact Checkers News Feed

    Back
    Top Bottom