Miscellaneous Trump (1 Viewer)

Users who are viewing this thread

    Huntn

    Misty Mountains Envoy
    Joined
    Mar 8, 2023
    Messages
    664
    Reaction score
    682
    Location
    Rivendell
    Offline

    Anxiety surges as Donald Trump may be indicted soon: Why 2024 is 'the final battle' and 'the big one'​


    WASHINGTON – It looks like American politics is entering a new age of anxiety, triggered by an unprecedented legal development: The potential indictment of a former president and current presidential candidate.

    Donald Trump's many legal problems – and calls for protests by his followers – have generated new fears of political violence and anxiety about the unknowable impact all this will have on the already-tense 2024 presidential election


    I’ll reframe this is a more accurate way, Are Presidents above the law? This new age was spurred into existence when home grown dummies elected a corrupt, mentally ill, anti-democratic, would be dictator as President and don’t bother to hold him responsible for his crimes, don’t want to because in the ensuing mayhem and destruction, they think they will be better off. The man is actually advocating violence (not the first time). And btw, screw democracy too. If this feeling spreads, we are In deep shirt.

    This goes beyond one treasonous Peice of work and out to all his minions. This is on you or should we be sympathetic to the idea of they can’t help being selfish suckers to the Nation’s detriment? Donald Trump is the single largest individual threat to our democracy and it‘s all going to boil down to will the majority of the GOP return to his embrace and start slinging his excrement to support him?
     
    Party affiliation has been fairly stable for the last 14 years.

     
    Does that apply to any quote made at any time?

    If so, the quotes from FDR, Lincoln, Jefferson, Adams and Washington are meaningless because “many things have changed in “X” years…”.
    No. Depends on the issue. Depends on the quote. Those gentlemen said many things. Not everything they uttered is relevant today. Some things are and some things are not.
     
    No. Depends on the issue. Depends on the quote. Those gentlemen said many things. Not everything they uttered is relevant today. Some things are and some things are not.
    And it depends on if TJ allows the quote. Only quotes that TJ wants. If he doesn't like it then the quote is too old and not applicable. This is right on brand with your inability to articulate your positions, you may as well just say "because I said so" since you don't have anything better to add.
     
    What are founding fathers put in place is relevant.
    One nation, under God is still relevant.
    and........
    Lincoln's Gettysburg address should still be studied in our H.S classrooms.
     
    Our founding fathers didn't do that part and it's not relevant.
    Oh well.
    I googled it and you are of course correct.
    Here is some helpful info...
    *
    There are Founding Fathers references to God, or Providence, etc. that are still relevant today. Too bad I chose the wrong thing to attempt to make my point.
    *
    *
     
    Oh well.
    I google it and you are of course correct.
    There are references to God, or Providence, etc. from the Founding Fathers that are still relevant today. Too bad I chose the wrong thing to attempt to make my point.
    *
    *

    They deliberately kept God out of their founding documents. You can read about their discussions with it. While the vast majority of them were religious men, they didn't all agree on religion and didn't want the government dictating religion to the people.
     
    They deliberately kept God out of their founding documents. You can read about their discussions with it. While the vast majority of them were religious men, they didn't all agree on religion and didn't want the government dictating religion to the people.
    The general consensus I believe was "We all agree that we are focused on our creator God...but some are Baptists, some are Presbyterians, some are Quakers..etc., etc. etc."
    We don't want to have a Government approved church....to each his or her own.
     
    The general consensus I believe was "We all agree that we are focused on our creator God...but some are Baptists, some are Presbyterians, some are Quakers..etc., etc. etc."
    We don't want to have a Government approved church....to each his or her own.
    How do you square this acknowledgment with your thirst to force everyone to abide by your own religious interpretations?
     

    Create an account or login to comment

    You must be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create account

    Create an account on our community. It's easy!

    Log in

    Already have an account? Log in here.

    General News Feed

    Fact Checkers News Feed

    Back
    Top Bottom