Harris VP watch (4 Viewers)

Users who are viewing this thread

Walz's Battalion Commander disagrees with you.

1000006089.jpg


Walz's Battalion Commander disagrees with you. It's more than you states. Walz didn't complete the Sergeant Major's academy, broke his enlistment contract and didn't complete any assignment as a Sergeant Major.

1000006089.jpg

Not possible to care less
 
Walz's Battalion Commander disagrees with you. It's more than you states. Walz didn't complete the Sergeant Major's academy, broke his enlistment contract and didn't complete any assignment as a Sergeant Major.

1000006089.jpg

After 20 years, you don’t have a contract. You can retire at any time you want with advance notice. Remember he retired at 20 years already and came back after 9/11. He followed that procedure and didn’t break any contract. What happen was he was promoted to the rank but still needed to finish the testing which he didn’t complete in time. Therefore, when he retired, he didn’t meet the requirements to retire at that rank. Also, you do realize the guy you keep quoting was paid to write that letter. Find someone who isn’t on the GOP payroll to answer the question. If his commanding officer promoted him to the rank then that is his rank. That is how it works. he didn’t just occupy the CSM office and claim he was a CSM. Which is what the moron above implies with the if I sit in a cockpit comparison.


Midway through the Snopes link it states that the Captain in the PR department of the National Guard stated he has the right to say he is a Command Master Sargent as he was not demoted while active or for punitive actions. It was administrative and impacted his retirement benefits.
 
After 20 years, you don’t have a contract. You can retire at any time you want with advance notice. Remember he retired at 20 years already and came back after 9/11. He followed that procedure and didn’t break any contract. What happen was he was promoted to the rank but still needed to finish the testing which he didn’t complete in time. Therefore, when he retired, he didn’t meet the requirements to retire at that rank. Also, you do realize the guy you keep quoting was paid to write that letter. Find someone who isn’t on the GOP payroll to answer the question. If his commanding officer promoted him to the rank then that is his rank. That is how it works. he didn’t just occupy the CSM office and claim he was a CSM. Which is what the moron above implies with the if I sit in a cockpit comparison.


Midway through the Snopes link it states that the Captain in the PR department of the National Guard stated he has the right to say he is a Command Master Sargent as he was not demoted while active or for punitive actions. It was administrative and impacted his retirement benefits.
Army Lieutenant Colonel Kristen Augé, the state public affairs officer for Minnesota National Guard, told Just the News on Wednesday that the governor did not retire as "Command Sergeant Major Walz" in 2005, as stated on Minnesota's official website, but as master sergeant "because he did not complete additional coursework at the U.S. Army Sergeants Major Academy." A soldier who does not complete the requisite coursework is automatically demoted, according to Army regulations.

Who paid John Kolb to write what he did and according to who?
 
Army Lieutenant Colonel Kristen Augé, the state public affairs officer for Minnesota National Guard, told Just the News on Wednesday that the governor did not retire as "Command Sergeant Major Walz" in 2005, as stated on Minnesota's official website, but as master sergeant "because he did not complete additional coursework at the U.S. Army Sergeants Major Academy." A soldier who does not complete the requisite coursework is automatically demoted, according to Army regulations.

Who paid John Kolb to write what he did and according to who?
He didn’t say he didn’t hold the rank of CSM?
 
He gets the benefits of a master sergeant but retired as a Command Sargent Major. It is a number based on the pay you get. It basically tells you what kind of money and other soft benefits you get. He was promoted to the rank of Command Sargent Major and was NOT DEMOTED. Do you not understand that? He didn’t qualify for the same retirement benefits but he was promoted to that rank and can say that. Even the National Guard commander who isn’t voting for him said he could do that. So give it up. This is frigging fact.
We really shouldn’t have to politely explain facts to this MAGA person over and over again. He is either incapable of understanding simple facts or is nothing but a MAGA troll. I don’t think he’s incapable of understanding something this simple, do you?

Those two soldiers attacking Walz are trash MAGA people. And calling him claiming a rank he actually held “stolen valor” just indicates that Trump requires his disciples to lie in his service. Everyone who has ever actually associated with Trump ends up with their morality and integrity in tatters. It’s not “stolen valor” - it is hair splitting.

And most veterans - all who are not MAGA - are disgusted by MAGA’s attacks on Walz. Nobody else cares and his approval rating continues to go up.

Which is the real reason for the attacks. There are at least 2 GOP office holders who are actually claiming stolen valor. MAGA doesn’t go after them, though.
 
Last edited:
He didn’t say he didn’t hold the rank of CSM?
Who paid John Kolb to write what he did and according to who? I think you made that up or you are talking about the Behrends guy which means nothing. That statement was made by Kolb.
 
Who paid John Kolb to write what he did and according to who? I think you made that up or you are talking about the Behrends guy which means nothing. That statement was made by Kolb.
So you’re just glossing over the lie about his supposed “contract”? Just not gonna comment on it?

That lie right there tells us that Kolb is just another partisan out to smear Walz. Easy to tell.
 
Who paid John Kolb to write what he did and according to who? I think you made that up or you are talking about the Behrends guy which means nothing. That statement was made by Kolb.
This is the letter from 2018 that started this whole thing.
 
This is the letter from 2018 that started this whole thing.
Like I said before, that has nothing to do with what Walz's Battalion Commander in John Kolb said about him. You were conflating two different people. That letter was from Behrends and Herr and not Kolb.
 
Keep the smearing up. We know why you can’t do anything else. Your support for a convicted felon, fraudster and sexual abuser is hard to square with being a good person. So you have to smear everyone else to make your own guilty conscience feel better.

You don’t fool anyone with this charade and your MAGA comrades don’t fool us either.
 
For those who claim that Walz is compromised due to his connections with china

https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory...-draws-gop-attacks-beijing-counting-112911400

I'd say he is far from a supporter of the chinese regieme as some claim


Walz was 26 when he returned from a one-year teaching gig in China. He spoke kindly of the Chinese people and said they had been “mistreated and cheated” by their government. He told the newspaper Chadron Record in his home state of Nebraska that he wished they had proper leadership.

Some of his students from his first visit was involved in the student uprising a few years later

Walz returned to China in 1994 for his honeymoon. He got married on June 4, the fifth anniversary of the bloody crackdown of the student-led pro-democracy movement in Tiananmen Square, which remains a political taboo in China. “He wanted to have a date he’ll always remember,” Gwen Whipple, Walz’s wife-to-be, told the Star-Herald of Scottsbluff, Nebraska, ahead of their trip.

Later, when Walz came to Washington as a Minnesota congressman, he became a champion for China’s human rights and served on a congressional committee that tracks the issue. He called a lunch with the Dalai Lama “life-changing.”
 
Nobody except MAGA believes any of the China stuff. They are like monkeys flinging feces right now. It’s out of desperation.
They really are showing their true faces, and also that they have zero situational awareness. Trump's and his minion's social media smear spamming helped Trump win in 2016. It didn't help at all in 2020. Now in 2024, it's costing Trump votes, because the overwhelming majority of American voters have had enough of their spoiled brat behavior. Trump and his minions are clueless that their constant social media smear spamming is actually motivating a comfortable majority of people to vote against Trump.

My sincere hope is they never figure that out until the election results start rolling in.
 
Like I said before, that has nothing to do with what Walz's Battalion Commander in John Kolb said about him. You were conflating two different people. That letter was from Behrends and Herr and not Kolb.
Your first tweet literally had Behrends name in it. You don’t recall that.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Advertisement

General News Feed

Fact Checkers News Feed

Sponsored

Back
Top Bottom