Capitol Riot arrests (1 Viewer)

Thread Attachment browser

Users who are viewing this thread

    Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
    Bigdaddysaints

    Bigdaddysaints

    Well-known member
    Joined
    Nov 16, 2019
    Messages
    2,737
    Reaction score
    4,005
    Location
    Prairieville, La
    Offline
    Figured we should start a separate thread on the arrests and those involved in the storming of the Capitol. I know it has been talked about in the other thread a lot, but for the ones who just want to follow the ones arrested and/or charged, this will be an easier way to see updates on the investigations.

    Link below is everyone who has been arrested. But we know there will be more.

    Capitol Breach Cases

    www.justice.gov www.justice.gov

    The website seems to be updated with new information daily.

    The ones who are getting the most air time:

    www.nytimes.com

    Notable Arrests After the Riot at the Capitol (Published 2021)

    Dozens have been charged since a mob of Trump supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6.
    www.nytimes.com www.nytimes.com

    Jake Angeli
    1610987626331.png


    Adam Johnson
    1610987698358.png


    Richard Barnett
    1610987768489.png


    Kevin Seefried
    1610987811788.png


    Eric Gavelek Munchel
    1610987942709.png


    Larry R. Brock
    Lisa Eisenhart
    Robert Keith Packer
    Klete Keller
    Aaron Mostofsky
    Anthime Joseph Gionet
    Peter Francis Stager
    Christine Priola
     
    Bigdaddysaints said:
    You cannot convince Roof that they were insurrectionist. Even though they had one purpose and one purpose only, which was to overturn a legal election and cause harm to elected gov't officials who were involved.
    Click to expand...

    That is because he is doing the long troll....and has been for some time....
     
    SFIDC3 said:
    That is because he is doing the long troll....and has been for some time....
    Click to expand...
    What I'm DOING is questioning the narrative. Not denying it... just questioning it.

    I'm saddened that you all seem happy with the FBI breaking the law (in effect). This is FAR more important than the pathetic riot in the Capitol.
     
    I find it kinda funny that @Roofgardener keeps saying in essence “we are overreacting, this wasn’t an insurrection” but is from a country that has spent the last 400 years lighting bonfires and burning effigies to remember the Gunpowder Rebellion. ;)
     
    Roofgardener said:
    What I'm DOING is questioning the narrative. Not denying it... just questioning it.

    I'm saddened that you all seem happy with the FBI breaking the law (in effect). This is FAR more important than the pathetic riot in the Capitol.
    Click to expand...
    They aren't breaking the law, they are using a terrible law that was signed in by the George W administration, that i would bet my bottom dollar that most of the ones who voted for Trump voted for GW. You get what you ask for... The Patriot Act allows that kind of stuff for domestic terrorism. What happened on the 6th fits the description of domestic terrorism.
     
    Bigdaddysaints said:
    They aren't breaking the law, they are using a terrible law that was signed in by the George W administration, that i would bet my bottom dollar that most of the ones who voted for Trump voted for GW. You get what you ask for... The Patriot Act allows that kind of stuff for domestic terrorism. What happened on the 6th fits the description of domestic terrorism.
    Click to expand...

    A lot of libertarian leaning conservatives absolutely hated the Patriot Act when it was passed. Still hate it today. That the Patriot Act continues to get renewed is baffling to me.
     
    Roofgardener said:
    What I'm DOING is questioning the narrative. Not denying it... just questioning it.
    Click to expand...
    You refuse to acknowledge that the people at the capitol were insurrectionists so you are, indeed, denying it. When you look at video with 5 actionable items and only describe 2 of them how they actually happen, you are, indeed, denying reality. You are questioning the "narrative" and those questions are being answered. But because those answers are contrary to your own narrative, you are denying them. In essence, you are doing exactly what you just said you are not doing.
     
    insidejob said:
    Dude, now that I know of this, I need to know how tall this guy was so I can start measuring things by Smoot. Who wouldn't want a piece of this?

    The smoot /ˈsmuːt/ is a nonstandard, humorous unit of length created as part of an MIT fraternity prank. It is named after Oliver R. Smoot, a fraternity pledge to Lambda Chi Alpha, who in October 1958 lay down repeatedly on the Harvard Bridge (between Boston and Cambridge, Massachusetts) so that his fraternity brothers could use his height to measure the length of the bridge.
    Click to expand...

    Not to be confused with the unit of Fred Smoot, which equates to 1/3 of the earth's surface
    "Two-thirds of the world is covered by water. The other third is covered by Fred Smoot." - Fred Smoot
     
    Saintamaniac said:
    You refuse to acknowledge that the people at the capitol were insurrectionists so you are, indeed, denying it. When you look at video with 5 actionable items and only describe 2 of them how they actually happen, you are, indeed, denying reality. You are questioning the "narrative" and those questions are being answered. But because those answers are contrary to your own narrative, you are denying them. In essence, you are doing exactly what you just said you are not doing.
    Click to expand...

    I mean actually acknowledging that Ashli Babbitt is dead is a step in the right direction I guess.

    When I looked up the video to refresh myself on how she was shot and what I ended up finding was video after video about how it's a "false flag" and Babbitt is really alive and well and we didn't see her die on video. What we saw was a Hollywood stuntwoman acting like she was shot :rolleyes:
     
    Roofgardener said:
    That actually happened. (though others have said she was trying to climb through the window, and that it was actually a uniformed officer). Firstly, it has a basis in reality, and secondly - your feelings don't change facts , to misquote Ben Shapiro. :D
    Click to expand...
    It didn’t happen anywhere like you described. I’ve seen the video multiple times, and your description is nowhere close to the reality.

    And if you’re quoting Ben Shapiro, that’s a big part of the problem. 😁
     
    For many accused of trying to block Congress from confirming the winner of the U.S. presidential election on Jan. 6, arrest was a reality check. Now they are getting another.


    As defendants charged in the Capitol siege have been coming through court, some have been shifting blame onto former president Donald Trump, downplaying their actions or expressing remorse.

    But federal judges — particularly those who work a few blocks from the Capitol — aren’t buying it.
One judge called a defendant’s claim of civil disobedience “detached from reality.”

    Another verbally smacked down an attorney who tried to use QAnon — the sprawling set of false claims that have coalesced into an extremist ideology — to explain his client shouting “Kill them all!” Other judges have been giving defendants civics lessons on how democracy works.

    U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell, the chief federal jurist for the District of Columbia, responded incredulously to one defense attorney who said his client believed Trump requested his unlawful conduct.

    She said that if a president could authorize overturning an election he would be no different from “a king or a dictator,” and “that is not how we operate here.”


    When the attorney added that the man, the accused leader of a Proud Boys group, had been “chastened rather than emboldened” by the federal charges and that his anti-government “fever has broken,”

    Howell clapped back.
“Essentially, that’s what your argument is, saying, ‘Whoops,’ now?” Howell asked. “Has he expressed any remorse or rejection of his membership in the Proud Boys, a gang of nationalist individuals?

    Does he reject the fantasy the election was stolen? Does he regret the positions that animated the mob on January 6th? Is there anything on the record about any of those things?”.................

     
    Optimus Prime said:
    For many accused of trying to block Congress from confirming the winner of the U.S. presidential election on Jan. 6, arrest was a reality check. Now they are getting another.


    As defendants charged in the Capitol siege have been coming through court, some have been shifting blame onto former president Donald Trump, downplaying their actions or expressing remorse.

    But federal judges — particularly those who work a few blocks from the Capitol — aren’t buying it.
One judge called a defendant’s claim of civil disobedience “detached from reality.”

    Another verbally smacked down an attorney who tried to use QAnon — the sprawling set of false claims that have coalesced into an extremist ideology — to explain his client shouting “Kill them all!” Other judges have been giving defendants civics lessons on how democracy works.

    U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell, the chief federal jurist for the District of Columbia, responded incredulously to one defense attorney who said his client believed Trump requested his unlawful conduct.

    She said that if a president could authorize overturning an election he would be no different from “a king or a dictator,” and “that is not how we operate here.”


    When the attorney added that the man, the accused leader of a Proud Boys group, had been “chastened rather than emboldened” by the federal charges and that his anti-government “fever has broken,”

    Howell clapped back.
“Essentially, that’s what your argument is, saying, ‘Whoops,’ now?” Howell asked. “Has he expressed any remorse or rejection of his membership in the Proud Boys, a gang of nationalist individuals?

    Does he reject the fantasy the election was stolen? Does he regret the positions that animated the mob on January 6th? Is there anything on the record about any of those things?”.................

    Click to expand...

    Thanks for posting this. Good read. :9:
     
    B4YOU said:
    I find it kinda funny that @Roofgardener keeps saying in essence “we are overreacting, this wasn’t an insurrection” but is from a country that has spent the last 400 years lighting bonfires and burning effigies to remember the Gunpowder Rebellion. ;)
    Click to expand...
    Saintamaniac said:
    You refuse to acknowledge that the people at the capitol were insurrectionists so you are, indeed, denying it. When you look at video with 5 actionable items and only describe 2 of them how they actually happen, you are, indeed, denying reality. You are questioning the "narrative" and those questions are being answered. But because those answers are contrary to your own narrative, you are denying them. In essence, you are doing exactly what you just said you are not doing.
    Click to expand...
    What ? Wait.. where have I said that the protesters wheren't insurrectionists ? In fact, I'm sure somewhere in these threads I have stated that they definately WHERE insurrectionists, by definition ?
     
    MT15 said:
    Yes, I remember that, roof. But you have to come clean, why can you not spell “were” correctly?
    Click to expand...
    I wasn't sure so I checked the UK to see if unlike us here in the US, they spelled "were" with an "H". It turns out that they don't use "H" to spell "were" so ...:shrug:
    I guess it's just his/her thing.
     

    Create an account or login to comment

    You must be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create account

    Create an account on our community. It's easy!

    Register

    Log in

    Already have an account? Log in here.

    Share this page

    General News Feed

    Fact Checkers News Feed

    Back
    Top Bottom