Luckily the public knows the economy is horrible despite the claims otherwise and the manipulated jobs numbers. Most people will be voting on their pocketbooks and that's why Biden will lose.
So wait. I asked a legitimate question and that's the response. No wonder people don't take you seriously.
You asking if she moved to Russia with Tucker is a legitimate question? Come on
Luckily, the same problems with capitalism occurred under Trump. The only thing Trump cared about was the stock market which can be seen by his Covid response. In addition, the failed CoVid response resulted in hundreds of thousands of excess deaths. Still wasn’t enough to get Trump re-elected so he decided to undermine the democratic institutions established by the constitution after undermining the press which, incidentally, Jefferson revered.
right everyone knows. I mean it's so obvious employment way up record stock market and such ya its horrible. we need to go back to the record unemployment trump had and record stock crashes and the worst GDP ever. thats a sure fie improvement. I mean trump really increased the economy. well his own economy anyway.
Isn't Tucker Carlson in Russia?
www.cnn.com
www.sfchronicle.com
www.cbsnews.com
theweek.com
www.vox.com
www.cnn.com
48hills.org
Believe all women unless reasonable questions about a specific woman's claims surface.
www.nbcnews.comAnswer the question. You’ve been ducking it for months now.
One other detail was she claimed she wasn’t wearing pantyhose at the time. When it was required in the dress code and all women who worked at the Capitol were required to wear them at all times. That, plus what you mentioned, plus no contemporary corroboration, plus the fact that the area wasn’t private at all, and he had to pull down pantyhose too? Plus history of bogus accusations. Plus her actions after her accusation was looked into and discounted….well, it’s pretty transparent.Believe all women unless reasonable questions about a specific woman's claims surface.
I don't know what actually happened between Biden and Tara Reade. When she first made her claims public, I was disappointed with Biden and thought, "et tu, Biden?" But then questions were raised about Tara and her claims. For instance:
(I read other sources originally, but this one covers it and the link was handy thanks to @bird )
I know two women who were sexually assaulted. They both told me shortly after it happened and swore me to secrecy. Neither of those women ever spoke highly of the people who assaulted them. Whenever their assailants names came up in conversation with others, they checked out of the conversation completely. Whenever they encountered their assailants in social settings, they were civil, but never cordial.
I automatically doubt the credibility of anyone who uses multiple aliases.
Also, there's two details of her claim that raise questions for me. The first is that she changed her accusation of what Biden specifically said and did to almost exactly mirror what E Jean Carroll accused Trump of saying and doing and she did so only after the specific details of E Jean Carroll's claims became public.
I tend to doubt coincidences, especially in the case of Trump's election opponent being accused, in the middle of an election campaign, of performing almost the exact same specific acts that Trump was first accused of saying and doing. At first Reade claimed:
Here are the facts regarding Tara Reade’s allegation against Joe Biden
First Read is your briefing from "Meet the Press" and the NBC Political Unit on the day's most important political stories and why they matter.
Then Reade later changed her claim to a near mirror image of the specific details of E Jean Carroll's claim. That raises a lot of doubt and skepticism for me.
Another detail that is questionable for me is Reade's claim that Biden assaulted her in a hallway. Sexual predators usually avoid assaulting people in public spaces, like a hallway. Even Carroll claims Trump waited until Carroll was in the concealed privacy of a dressing room to attack her. That's more consistent with predatorial behavior, so its' more believable to me than someone being assaulted in a hallway. Biden had ample opportunity to assault Reade as claimed in a concealed, private space with no risk of being caught, so why take the unnecessary risk of a hallway?
All of the above is why I now question Reade's accusations. The key word is "question." I don't know what happened, but I do have doubts about what Reade claims happened and I don't simply take her word for it. If a jury ever finds at the end of a trial that Biden did rape Reade as she claims, then I will give her and the jury the benefit of doubt.
Don't look now. I don't want to alarm you. But Putin might be under your bed!
Either you don’t know, or you are deflecting desperately. Which is it? If you are deflecting, then your repeated pushing of Reade’s accusation seems trollish to me. And is yet another example of you parroting Russian talking points.
Nothing we didn’t already know that you do.I missed or forgot about the pantyhose detail. I didn't know it was required by dress code. I think that's a really "effed" up dress code.
Was completely normal in those days. We had a similar dress code in high school when I started. It changed by the time I graduated.
It's like I'm discussing foreign policy with an 8 year old as much as you mention or blame everything on Russia.Either you don’t know, or you are deflecting desperately. Which is it? If you are deflecting, then your repeated pushing of Reade’s accusation seems trollish to me. And is yet another example of you parroting Russian talking points.
Create an account or login to comment
You must be a member in order to leave a comment
Create account
Create an account on our community. It's easy!
Log in
Already have an account? Log in here.
