Assassination attempt on Trump (1 Viewer)

Users who are viewing this thread

    I will look for the article, but the widow of the man who was killed was interviewed today. From the except I saw there were a couple of takeaways:

    1. Biden attempted to call her, but she refused to accept the call. She explained that her husband was “devout” about Trump and didn’t think he would want her to talk to Biden. She also said she had no ill will toward Biden, she knew he wasn’t responsible for what happened.

    2. She said Trump hasn’t called.
     
    So does this mean that Trump isn’t signing off on Project 2025?

    Hard to imagine he would co-sign a plan that by his distancing nearly caused his death.
    you said you couldn't wrap your head around why a Republican would want Trump dead. Malcolm X was Muslim, at one time part of the Nation of Islam. the guy who killed him was Muslim and part of the Nation of Islam. it happens. it's not that far of a reach to say a Republican would want Trump dead..
    also, you didn't acknowledge the person who shot Reagan because he thought that's what Jody Foster wanted.. i know it's hard to believe sometimes they are just disturbed..
     
    Last edited:
    He could have called, don’t make excuses for that. I was absolutely shocked, I figured he had comms people who could have advised him on that.

    Maybe they told him give her some time. I don't know. Neither do you.
     
    I will look for the article, but the widow of the man who was killed was interviewed today. From the except I saw there were a couple of takeaways:

    1. Biden attempted to call her, but she refused to accept the call. She explained that her husband was “devout” about Trump and didn’t think he would want her to talk to Biden. She also said she had no ill will toward Biden, she knew he wasn’t responsible for what happened.

    2. She said Trump hasn’t called.
    why would trump call he has said often he could care less if they died for him.
     
    you said you couldn't wrap your head around why a Republican would want Trump dead. Malcolm X was Muslim, at one time part of the Nation of Islam. the guy who killed him was Muslim and part of the Nation of Islam. it happens. it's not that far of a reach to say a Republican would want Trump dead..
    That’s interesting. I had no idea that Malcolm X was murdered by Walter Hagan. Did Hagan’s departure from the Nation of Islam happen before or after he murdered Malcolm?
    also, you didn't acknowledge the person who shot Reagan because he thought that's what Jody Foster wanted.. i know it's hard to believe sometimes they are just disturbed..
    Like Malcolm X’s murder, I had no idea who shot Reagan. It’s one of those things where if I learn one more new thing I’ll forget something important, like 28-3.

    I hope that they can get to the bottom of what caused this.
     
    A lot of people are going to be out of jobs when this is over.

    SS has been a clown show for a long time. I remember when someone shot up the White House while Obama was president. They didn't even realize the shooter hit the WH for days.

    P.S. Why are they not using drones yet for survelliance?
     
    SS has been a clown show for a long time. I remember when someone shot up the White House while Obama was president. They didn't even realize the shooter hit the WH for days.

    P.S. Why are they not using drones yet for survelliance?
    I remember that. How do these jokers sleep at night?
     
    SS has been a clown show for a long time. I remember when someone shot up the White House while Obama was president. They didn't even realize the shooter hit the WH for days.

    P.S. Why are they not using drones yet for survelliance?
    Why are "they" not using drones for assassination attempts? C'mon, people, it's 2024.
     
    Because his is a very interesting historical event..
    What's interesting is that you link to a historically inaccurate Wiki page that was clearly edited by Nazi apologists and deniers for the Nazi's.

    If you're genuinely interested in the story this is an accurate source:


    Hett wrote that, given the extent of the fire and the amount of time that would have been needed inside the Reichstag to set it, there was no way that van der Lubbe acted alone. Citing witness testimonies that became available after the fall of the Soviet Union, Hett argued that the Communists weren’t involved at all; rather, said Hett, the group of Nazis who investigated the fire and later discussed its causes with historians covered up Nazi involvement to evade war crimes prosecution.

    Black does not entirely agree with Hett’s assessment, but he says that he is now convinced the one-man theory is false. “I would say that van der Lubbe could not have started that fire alone, based on the evidence that is now available,” he says. “It seems likely that the Nazis were involved. But you don’t have anyone who can say, yes, I saw the Nazis.”
     
    Last edited:
    Yeah, it's almost as bad as Mike Johnson freezing up and leaving the stage when his teleprompter broke and all the people that misspoke throughout the convention.

    None of those things are a big deal or prove anything to me, but if you're going to make a big deal out of the times that Biden has gaffes and ignore all the times Trump and Republicans do the very same thing, then you're being one sided and partisan.

    That's your right and there's nothing inherently wrong with that, just don't try to pretend that you're not partisan. People only pretend that they are something they're not, if they're trying to hide something.
     
    Last edited:

    Create an account or login to comment

    You must be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create account

    Create an account on our community. It's easy!

    Log in

    Already have an account? Log in here.

    General News Feed

    Fact Checkers News Feed

    Back
    Top Bottom