- Banned
- #1
SaintForLife
Well-known member
Offline
Trump is alive, but his ear was bleeding
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your comment implied that the USSS was leading the investigation. How else am I supposed to read what you said?I don’t know where I said that the FBI wasn’t leading the investigation, so…
As the USSS is investigating itself.Your comment implied that the USSS was leading the investigation. How else am I supposed to read what you said?
The White House fence jumper investigation and the agent extracurricular activities are just 2 that has happened in the last 10 years. What makes you believe that this investigation is any more special than these other investigations into the USSS?
AOC disagrees with youIt's certainly not, but that doesn't mean they'll break protocol just to make the politicians happy, which isn't their job anyway. Call a hearing after the investigation if they want to know what happened.
AOC disagrees with you
And that's true for most agencies. They have their own investigators within the agencies who are tasked specifically with internal investiations and they don't typically interact with agents outside of investigation purposes.I don’t know where I said that the FBI wasn’t leading the investigation, so…
I just said that the USSS was investigating itself (which we both know to be true).
Doesn't have to be. But I'm gonna comment on what i comment. You're free to disagree or comment. Thats the point of the board.Is everything going to be a point of contention between us?
Not at all, lol.And is it because I don’t believe in DA as HC?
AOC disagrees with you
There is some rare bipartisan concern.
Your specificity of the timeline is refreshing to see (I hadn’t seen you share that previously).I got no issue with that of they feel like they're not getting enough answers, but I wouldn't have expected any 10 days after the assassination attempt. 30 days and I'd feel differently. 10 days really isn't enough time to gather all of the facts.
I have no idea if this is accurate.
“Someone who regularly visited Crooks home and work also visited a building in Washington, DC located in Gallery Place.
“This is in the same vicinity of an
@FBI office on June 26, 2023.
“Whose device is this?”
Someone said that information can be found through geofencing. I'm assuming they purchased the information from some third party data company but I don't know how it works.
Then you tell me why he was given 9 months to resign.
I knew better than to try to engage with you. Just go play message board troll with someone else. I can’t even decipher your points above and your points just don’t matter. Please ignore me in the future as I will be ignoring you.Keith Oberman agrees with you. You actually believe Keith Oberman. Congrats.
I bet you really still think it was staged too.
Do you think the release you posted above is accurate in light of our commander in tweet stepping down via X?
Remember the “breathless” revelation that the shooter had three (3!) “encrypted overseas accounts”? And we would get the details in the hearing? I’m not reading certain peoples’ posts any longer, but I just wondered if anyone had mentioned that the shooter had accounts on 3 gaming sites, hence the “encrypted overseas accounts”. This is actually pretty comical, when you think about it.so someone who at one time, been at Crooks' home in the last year ( or more, not quite clear on the parameters ) had been at the Gallery Place Mall in DC? Could there have been a concert at Capital One Arena ( next door ) they were in town for?
way to many questions to entertain any of what they are attempting to connect.
I don’t think any of us have full details to say one way or the other what happened, however he did step down/ resign in the same year that the assassination took place.Define "given" and then provide proof, you are the one alleging he resigned because of the assassination attempt.....9 months later....
you are making a huge reach/assumption and then asking others to provide proof it "didn't happen"? Sounds like a troll to me....
The Republicans that called for the hearing so soon know she's not going to divulge much information, which is exactly why the Republicans called for the hearings so soon.I watched a chunk of it this morning, and it's pretty much what I expected at this point of the investigation. With multiple agencies investigating, she's not gonna give out or comment on much related to the specific case for obvious legal reasons. But go ahead and keep making your wild-eyed conspiracy theories. It's all you know hoe to do.
Did you not hear AOC also asking why things had taken so long?The Republicans that called for the hearing so soon know she's not going to divulge much information, which is exactly why the Republicans called for the hearings so soon.
They want to use her understandable unwillingness to divulge information regarding an ongoing investigation to create false talking points that she's hiding something and doesn't know the answers to questions.