All things political. Coronavirus Edition. (1 Viewer)

Users who are viewing this thread

    Maxp

    Well-known member
    Joined
    May 17, 2019
    Messages
    495
    Reaction score
    848
    Offline
    I fear we are really going to be in a bad place due to the obvious cuts to the federal agencies that deal with infectious disease, but also the negative effect the Affordable Care act has had on non urban hospitals. Our front line defenses are ineffectual and our ability to treat the populous is probably at an all time low. Factor in the cost of healthcare and I can see our system crashing. What do you think about the politics of this virus?
     
    Neither is Gorsuch, who is apparently such a massive butt crevasse that he is the only justice who refused to wear a mask when asked to by Roberts to protect one of the liberal justices who has a high-risk condition. And he sits directly next to her.

    Neither is frat boy butt crevasse Kavanaugh of the mystery six figures of credit card debt wiped out right before nomination.

    Trump wasn’t sending us the best. Of anything.
     
    Neither is Gorsuch, who is apparently such a massive butt crevasse that he is the only justice who refused to wear a mask when asked to by Roberts to protect one of the liberal justices who has a high-risk condition. And he sits directly next to her.

    Neither is frat boy butt crevasse Kavanaugh of the mystery six figures of credit card debt wiped out right before nomination.

    Trump wasn’t sending us the best. Of anything.
    So you don't like Justices that tend to be R's. Got it.
     
    So you don't like Justices that tend to be R's. Got it.

    No, MT clearly doesn't like justices that are butt crevasses and may have been paid for. That just happens to be a category populated exclusively by conservatives.
     
    So you don't like Justices that tend to be R's. Got it.
    It might have to do with the refusing to wear a mask setting directly next to a high risk person. Anti masking by a supreme court justice is telling us his intelligence level or it is the position whom ever bought and paid for him wants.

    The obviously a creep being bought and paid for so just a side to the statement.

    Or do you think he is just that dumb? Or do you think he has no empathy for others? What is your take.

    Please pick one and not dance around it.
     
    It might have to do with the refusing to wear a mask setting directly next to a high risk person. Anti masking by a supreme court justice is telling us his intelligence level or it is the position whom ever bought and paid for him wants.

    The obviously a creep being bought and paid for so just a side to the statement.

    Or do you think he is just that dumb? Or do you think he has no empathy for others? What is your take.

    Please pick one and not dance around it.
    Was it one mask or 2? 95s, cloth or surgical? When did this happen? Who was the 'at risk person'?
    All of those questions are relevant to the timeline because it turns out the mask thing was never concrete and had constantly moving criteria.

    The good news is that the rest of world is starting to wake up a little.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/worl...be-good-news-for-the-us/ar-AASU2sR?li=BBnb7Kz

    Johannesburg — Only eight weeks after the world first heard about the Omicron variant of the coronavirus, when researchers in South Africa who discovered the strain notified global authorities, that country's wave of infections has fallen as sharply as it climbed. Not only that, but South Africa has weathered its fourth wave of COVID-19 with very little interruption to people's lives.

    CBS News foreign correspondent Debora Patta reports that in the suburbs of Johannesburg, restaurants are busy again, traffic is jammed, and the city is bustling.

    Omicron quickly became the focus of global anxiety as infections spread across South Africa with ferocious speed. Within days, the country was at the epicenter of the pandemic. And then… well, not much happened at all.


    UK is droppping mask mandates/and public passports and test criteria.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-60047438

    • Mandatory Covid passports for entering nightclubs and large events would end, though organisations could choose to use the NHS Covid pass if they wished
    • People would no longer be advised to work from home and should discuss their return to offices with employers
    • Face masks will no longer be mandated, though people are still advised to wear coverings in enclosed or crowded spaces and when meeting strangers
    • From Thursday, secondary school pupils will no longer have to wear face masks in classrooms and government guidance on their use in communal areas would be removed "shortly"
     
    No, MT clearly doesn't like justices that are butt crevasses and may have been paid for. That just happens to be a category populated exclusively by conservatives.
    Got it. My mistake. When you describe it it doesn't sound political at all.
     
    Was it one mask or 2? 95s, cloth or surgical? When did this happen? Who was the 'at risk person'?
    All of those questions are relevant to the timeline because it turns out the mask thing was never concrete and had constantly moving criteria.

    The good news is that the rest of world is starting to wake up a little.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/worl...be-good-news-for-the-us/ar-AASU2sR?li=BBnb7Kz

    Johannesburg — Only eight weeks after the world first heard about the Omicron variant of the coronavirus, when researchers in South Africa who discovered the strain notified global authorities, that country's wave of infections has fallen as sharply as it climbed. Not only that, but South Africa has weathered its fourth wave of COVID-19 with very little interruption to people's lives.

    CBS News foreign correspondent Debora Patta reports that in the suburbs of Johannesburg, restaurants are busy again, traffic is jammed, and the city is bustling.

    Omicron quickly became the focus of global anxiety as infections spread across South Africa with ferocious speed. Within days, the country was at the epicenter of the pandemic. And then… well, not much happened at all.


    UK is droppping mask mandates/and public passports and test criteria.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-60047438

    • Mandatory Covid passports for entering nightclubs and large events would end, though organisations could choose to use the NHS Covid pass if they wished
    • People would no longer be advised to work from home and should discuss their return to offices with employers
    • Face masks will no longer be mandated, though people are still advised to wear coverings in enclosed or crowded spaces and when meeting strangers
    • From Thursday, secondary school pupils will no longer have to wear face masks in classrooms and government guidance on their use in communal areas would be removed "shortly"
    Good dance and pivot.

    Exactly what I expected from you nothing of substance ever.

    So refusal of wearing a mask was fine by you?
     
    Good dance and pivot.

    Exactly what I expected from you nothing of substance ever.

    So refusal of wearing a mask was fine by you?
    I am trying to answer your question, I just want to know the instance you are asking me to comment on.

    Do you really think I care if people wear a mask? I don't care or wear a mask if that helps your feel I answered your question.
     
    I am trying to answer your question, I just want to know the instance you are asking me to comment on.

    Do you really think I care if people wear a mask? I don't care or wear a mask if that helps your feel I answered your question.
    Ok I see this is a challenge for you.

    You posted news from counties that have gone thru the new wave. Ha not a damn thing to do with this.

    That has exactly nothing to do with the rapey drunkard we are talking about now

    That is exactly a pivot.

    Did you agree with his mask refusal sitting next to a person in high risk during the beginning of the pandemic?

    You don't have to worry about it now. Do you know why?

    Come on this is simple.
     
    So only 87 of the 270 doctors that complained about Rogan are “actual doctors”?!?! What a mess.


    Point taken and the media shouldn't portrayed it that way if true

    However...... going from, "270 professionals say You blow"

    to

    "Only 87 of them are actually qualified to say You blow", isn't exactly a win
     
    So only 87 of the 270 doctors that complained about Rogan are “actual doctors”?!?! What a mess.

    Did you read it?


    conservative news site The Blaze found. Signatories include numerous nurse practitioners, veterinarians, a dentist and close to 100 Ph.D.s and Ph.D. candidates.

    Some are doctors some are a hair from doctors and vets have to know a ton more than a doctor because they care for multiple species. All of them have more medical training than Joe "will you eat crazy stuff for cash" Rogan.

    Well I would read a article from fox but then it is a The Blase reprint. What do you think of the blaze?

    Ok I know it is Glenn Beck and I don't think much of him. Hell fox didn't either that fired him in 2011.
     
    Ok I see this is a challenge for you.

    You posted news from counties that have gone thru the new wave. Ha not a damn thing to do with this.

    That has exactly nothing to do with the rapey drunkard we are talking about now

    That is exactly a pivot.

    Did you agree with his mask refusal sitting next to a person in high risk during the beginning of the pandemic?

    You don't have to worry about it now. Do you know why?

    Come on this is simple.
    No. Not me. I think it is far more of a challenge for you though.

    The country that first found the Omni has not bearing on a covid discussion? That seems a bit strange.

    Ok, see, that wasn't that hard. I am bright enough, usually, to pick up context clues. I now know you are talking about Kavanaugh.

    Again, who was the 'at risk' person he was sitting next too? Can you link something showing his refusal, because I can't find anything on google.

    I seriously doubt I was worried but what was I worried about? So, no, I don't know why.

    Is it though? I am having a hard time following you, it is my mistake I am sure.
     
    No. Not me. I think it is far more of a challenge for you though.

    The country that first found the Omni has not bearing on a covid discussion? That seems a bit strange.

    Ok, see, that wasn't that hard. I am bright enough, usually, to pick up context clues. I now know you are talking about Kavanaugh.

    Again, who was the 'at risk' person he was sitting next too? Can you link something showing his refusal, because I can't find anything on google.

    I seriously doubt I was worried but what was I worried about? So, no, I don't know why.

    Is it though? I am having a hard time following you, it is my mistake I am sure.
    Rocket scientist it is the one that does it from zoom because his lack of respect for persons with existing conditions showed by rapey drunk guy.

     
    Rocket scientist it is the one that does it from zoom because his lack of respect for persons with existing conditions showed by rapey drunk guy.


    I thought Kavanaugh was the 'rapey drunk' guy on the court?
     
    Rocket scientist it is the one that does it from zoom because his lack of respect for persons with existing conditions showed by rapey drunk guy.


    See, and you got upset I 'danced' around your question but in reality, I was just trying to figure out what you were talking about.
    I don't generally comment on things I don't know about. I know it is different on your side.
     

    Create an account or login to comment

    You must be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create account

    Create an account on our community. It's easy!

    Log in

    Already have an account? Log in here.

    General News Feed

    Fact Checkers News Feed

    Back
    Top Bottom