Harris VP watch (9 Viewers)

Users who are viewing this thread

Now this will need to be addressed
=====================

CNN) — When Democratic vice presidential nominee Tim Walz first ran for Congress in 2006, his campaign repeatedly made false statements about the details of his 1995 arrest for drunk and reckless driving.

According to court and police records connected to the incident, Walz admitted in court that he had been drinking when he was pulled over for driving 96 mph in a 55 mph zone in Nebraska. Walz was then transported by a state trooper to a local hospital for a blood test, showing he had a blood alcohol level of .128, well above the state’s legal limit of 0.1 at the time.

But in 2006, his campaign repeatedly told the press that he had not been drinking that night, claiming that his failed field sobriety test was due to a misunderstanding related to hearing loss from his time in the National Guard. The campaign also claimed that Walz was allowed to drive himself to jail that night.

None of that was true.

A CNN KFile review of statements made by the Walz campaign at the time reveals numerous discrepancies between how the campaign described the events and the facts of what actually took place that night.

“The DUI charge was dropped for a Reason: it wasn’t true,” Walz’s then-campaign communications director told local news in 2006. “The trooper had him drive to the station and then leave on his own after being at the station. Tim feels bad about speeding and has paid the ticket and apologized to his family at the time it happened.”

In fact, the incident’s police report clearly states that Walz was transported by police to a local hospital for blood alcohol testing after being arrested. And this week, Nebraska state police confirmed to CNN that Walz was taken by a state trooper to jail…….

Walz has a pattern of lying about his record.

He lied about:

- Being in War
- His Military rank
- Being "The football coach"
- His DUI arrest

And now this:

 
Joe Biden is technically the current President although he doesn't seem to be capable of being the President.
And yet you believe your rapidly declining false god is capable.

He is the only old man in the race. So, howzabout some consistency?
 
Walz has a pattern of lying about his record.

He lied about:

- Being in War
- His Military rank
- Being "The football coach"
- His DUI arrest

And now this:



"IFV" term is routinely used as a "catch all " for any type of fertilization procedure

They used IUI i think its called.

next outrage issue in 3....2.....1
 
So this post and following posts demonstrate that as many times as you've complained about Walz supposedly lying and misleading, that's not what you care about. You're simply a partisan hack, and that's the only reason you're attacking Walz.
I'm highlighting the Democrats VP nominee's lies. Feel free to highlight Trump and Vance’s lies.

All politicians lie so it's laughable that you think saying Trump lies more somehow negates Walz's multiple lies about his record.
As for your other "whatabout," neither Clinton nor Biden attacked veterans. Your man's campaign did. What about that?
Oh so no more bone spurs now? Does being a veteran shield them from any criticisms? What about the attacks on Vance?
 
So you "don't like" (I used air quotes to note the shallowness of your claim) his attacks on McCain, but McCain was bad, so his attacks on McCain are rationalized in your partisan little brain.
I said I didn't agree with his attacks on McCain. Do you think that should cause me not to support Trump?
 
I'm highlighting the Democrats VP nominee's lies. Feel free to highlight Trump and Vance’s lies.

All politicians lie so it's laughable that you think saying Trump lies more somehow negates Walz's multiple lies about his record.

Oh so no more bone spurs now? Does being a veteran shield them from any criticisms? What about the attacks on Vance?

So most here belive that lies matter and that Walz hasn't lied about anything y'all are accusing him of. At most it's statements taken out of context. But since you don't belive lies matter, why do you care so much about statements taken out of context to continue to post about them over and over? Are you trying to convince us that what you say are Walz's lies matter, but Trump's lifetime is lying does not?

Trump isn't just a lier, he's a delusional lier. And Vance is just a yes man. He'll lie about anything Trump tells him to lie about in service to Trump.
 
So most here belive that lies matter and that Walz hasn't lied about anything y'all are accusing him of. At most it's statements taken out of context. But since you don't belive lies matter, why do you care so much about statements taken out of context to continue to post about them over and over? Are you trying to convince us that what you say are Walz's lies matter, but Trump's lifetime is lying does not?

Trump isn't just a lier, he's a delusional lier. And Vance is just a yes man. He'll lie about anything Trump tells him to lie about in service to Trump.
Taken out of context? Not quite. It's okay to admit Walz has lied about his record. Trump is a habitual liar. See it's not hard to admit it.

 
Taken out of context? Not quite. It's okay to admit Walz has lied about his record. Trump is a habitual liar. See it's not hard to admit it.



Yes, taken out of context. Thanks for proving my point with the video.

He was Command Sargent Major. That's not a lie.
 
He wasn't a Retired Command Sargent Major like he claimed multiple times. He retired as a Master Sergeant.
He gets the benefits of a master sergeant but retired as a Command Sargent Major. It is a number based on the pay you get. It basically tells you what kind of money and other soft benefits you get. He was promoted to the rank of Command Sargent Major and was NOT DEMOTED. Do you not understand that? He didn’t qualify for the same retirement benefits but he was promoted to that rank and can say that. Even the National Guard commander who isn’t voting for him said he could do that. So give it up. This is frigging fact.
 
He gets the benefits of a master sergeant but retired as a Command Sargent Major. It is a number based on the pay you get. It basically tells you what kind of money and other soft benefits you get. He was promoted to the rank of Command Sargent Major and was NOT DEMOTED. Do you not understand that? He didn’t qualify for the same retirement benefits but he was promoted to that rank and can say that. Even the National Guard commander who isn’t voting for him said he could do that. So give it up. This is frigging fact.
Walz's Battalion Commander disagrees with you. It's more than what you said. Walz didn't complete the Sergeant Major's academy, broke his enlistment contract and didn't complete any assignment as a Sergeant Major.

1000006089.jpg

 
Last edited:

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Advertisement

General News Feed

Fact Checkers News Feed

Sponsored

Back
Top Bottom