Media Tracker (2 Viewers)

Users who are viewing this thread

    SaintForLife

    Well-known member
    Joined
    Oct 5, 2019
    Messages
    7,313
    Reaction score
    3,404
    Location
    Madisonville
    Offline
    I figured we needed a thread specifically about the media.

    There was a very big correction recently by the Washington Post.


    That story was supposedly "independently confirmed" by CNN, NBC News, USA Today, ABC News, & PBS News Hour. How could they all have gotten the quote wrong if they actually independently confirmed the story?






    Why do all the errors always go in one political direction and not closer to 50/50?
     
    We're pitted against each other now by the media like never before. No matter what the story is, they have their minions in the press reporting in a way that makes you hate your neighbor and blame your neighbor and not the guys doing it.

    So the oligarchy keeps us fighting amongst each other



    Smart people have figured that part out.
    Yes, we have, and we look forward to when you do the same. We're waiting for you with empty hands and open arms.
     

    She could launch an investigation to see how a LA Times reporter's question made it to Biden's note card before she asked it. But she knows the real reason why so she will just spin even though it's not believable.




    Received many comments and questions on press conferences. Important to note that WH staff prepare for press conferences by creating lists of questions they expect could be asked for the president. They look at questions asked in briefings and of staff, stories reporters are doing, and known areas of interest. It is their job to anticipate questions reporters would ask. Staff interact with reporters every day and are very familiar with reporter subject areas. That is their job. Standard. It’s their task to prepare for likely questions. That is not WH reporters providing questions in advance.

    I am saying that staff game out anticipated questions that they think specific reporters may use because they talk to those reporters daily, know their work and previous questions posed to the WH team. Any of us around the WH every day can anticipate what many reporters would likely ask based on their specific reporting assignments and current news issues. A photo card with an anticipated question is prepared for the president to review. Overlooked is that question was not actually asked as written because it was staff written.



    She is so full of shirt!
     
    We're pitted against each other now by the media like never before. No matter what the story is, they have their minions in the press reporting in a way that makes you hate your neighbor and blame your neighbor and not the guys doing it.

    So the oligarchy keeps us fighting amongst each other



    Smart people have figured that part out.
    And yet the oligarchs are, in general, in support of the Republican Party. We have yet to see anything from you in opposition to the Republican Party or Trump. Trump will enact policies that are precisely aimed at continuing the internal strife.
     
    So two updates from the NYT. First one at 7:01

    IMG_1466.jpeg

    Second one later after some fact have emerged:

    IMG_1467.jpeg

    people who are complaining about this are totally morons. Like to stupid to breathe.
     

    In engineering there are static calculations and dynamic calculations. Those were the stadic news filler reports which were valid only for that brief moment in time when the service rushed the Criminal off stage after it appeared he fell down.

    Their purpose was to place a time stamp on the begging of their network reporting.

    They will later huff and puff about which network got their first report out. They'll say words like "scoop." "WE SCOOPED!" Silly stuff, but not what is being made from it by your foolish tweeter.

    Those reports were eclipsed bare moments later when dynamic information began to flow. Both those outlets of news quickly adapted to that new flood of dynamic information.

    That tweeter is an ill informed fool.

    You were ... .
     

    His campaign retweeted a post blaming Biden for the shooting. And don’t act like he has anything more than a sore ear at this point. His campaign needed to be rebuked.

    Also his potential “Czar of Retribution” tweeted a call for violence to “avenge” this. Mentioning the 2nd amendment of course.
     
    Last edited:
    Casual Arty Fan has the chops, he could translate that.



    I checked it, it dictionary translates as 'Trump's 3D ear!' So CAF rendered a decent translation.

    I would have translated it as 'Hole in Trump's ear!'
     
    Last edited:
    A good thread that will boost media literacy, which is sorely needed by someone in this thread:





    There is more. But to suggest, as SFL does, that the reporting was somehow a conspiracy to downplay the events is just wrong and irresponsible.
     

    Create an account or login to comment

    You must be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create account

    Create an account on our community. It's easy!

    Log in

    Already have an account? Log in here.

    General News Feed

    Fact Checkers News Feed

    Back
    Top Bottom