Pelosi Will Possibly Use 25th Amendment to Remove Trump (2 Viewers)

Thread Attachment browser

Users who are viewing this thread

    Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)
    Mr. Blue Sky

    Mr. Blue Sky

    Still P***** at Yoko
    Joined
    Feb 4, 2020
    Messages
    545
    Reaction score
    1,015
    Location
    Between the Moon and New York City
    Offline
    Awesome idea, the guy is even more off-his-rocker than usual, only wish this had been done sooner.




    Nancy Pelosi says Congress will discuss using 25th Amendment powers which could REMOVE Donald Trump amid fears COVID steroid treatment is affecting his mental health
    • Speaker Nancy Pelosi said she would lead a discussion on Friday about invoking the 25th amendment to remove President Donald Trump from office
    • 'Come here tomorrow,' she told reporters on Capitol Hill Thursday. 'We're going to be talking about the 25th Amendment'


    www.dailymail.co.uk

    Pelosi says Congress will discuss using 25th Amendment powers on Trump

    Speaker Nancy Pelosi wants to form a commission to evaluate President Donald Trump's mental health and his ability to hold the office of the presidency, she announced on Thursday.
    www.dailymail.co.uk www.dailymail.co.uk
     
    DaveXA said:
    Where did I say it's no big deal? I didn't come close to saying that. And I asked you to source your claim about military personnel knowingly heeding an illegal order. Until you cite your source, I'm gonna assume it's not true. Iirc, there were questions about who gave the order and who carried out those orders. If Trump told Barr to give the order to clear out the street, Barr can't tell soldiers what to do. Who exactly where the agents who cleared the streets? I had originally thought they were agents under one of the agencies under the DOJ. The military, unless they're national guard, are not subject to orders outside their chain of command. I haven't read anything about the military participating in the removal of the protesters in DC. I want to say it might have been the national guard because that was the rumor, but Trump would have needed the approval of the governor, which I'm drawing a blank on. That whole episode was a shirt-show and I'm not recalling any military involvement in that.
    Click to expand...
    The military has said they don't know who gave the orders. That's not comforting at all.

    The military has said they didn't participate, which they clarified to mean that their troops weren't directly involved in the assault of any of the protestors. That means they didn't actually shoot or push anyone around.

    They have not denied and cannot deny the confirmations that they provided logistical support. That support is an illegal form of participation.

    It's all a moot point, because I don't think Trump will ever actually give the order or be allowed to give the order to deploy a nuclear weapon. That said, the system is not as safeguarded as people think. On a scale of 1 to 10 with 10 the most safe, I'd give it a 7.
     
    Mr. Blue Sky said:
    So, just so we’re clear- you think Pelosi needs to be removed more than Donald Trump needs to be removed? If not, then i dont understand why you would make that post in a thread about possibly invoking the 25th on Donald Trump... And if you DO think that Pelosi is a bigger threat than Trump, then would you mind expounding on that?
    Click to expand...
    No. I just think Pelosi has been a bad 'figurehead' for the DNC. As far as how that relates to the thread, her tactic of pushing the 25th Amendment at this point isn't particularly helpful and only plays into the conspiracy theories.
     
    So, I think the articles are misleading, not to mention the thread title. There is a bill from a democratic House member that was proposed a while ago and they are dusting it off. As I understand it, the purpose of the bill is to codify the use of the 25th Amendment. I think it establishes a bipartisan council to evaluate the president’s health. I did not spend much time on the article, just skimmed the first of it.

    I think this thread is much ado about nothing, whether Pelosi put it out there in such a way to needle Trump, or the two article authors took some liberties, I don’t know.
     
    LA - L.A. said:
    The military has said they don't know who gave the orders. That's not comforting at all.

    The military has said they didn't participate, which they clarified to mean that their troops weren't directly involved in the assault of any of the protestors. That means they didn't actually shoot or push anyone around.

    They have not denied and cannot deny the confirmations that they provided logistical support. That support is an illegal form of participation.

    It's all a moot point, because I don't think Trump will ever actually give the order or be allowed to give the order to deploy a nuclear weapon. That said, the system is not as safeguarded as people think. On a scale of 1 to 10 with 10 the most safe, I'd give it a 7.
    Click to expand...

    Since it's moot...I agree. :hihi:
     
    The only reason Pelosi should go is she'll be 81 in March. That's definitely getting up there...they really should have a required retirement age.
     
    SaintForLife said:
    Nothing personal unless you started the rumor in the media that dexamethasone can make someone crazy.

    I deal with the Covid patients at work and I've never seen those kind of extreme side effects in one single patient.
    Click to expand...

    Just because you haven't seen a patient with an adverse side effect doesn't mean that it doesn't happen. If you see 2 patients on long term corticosteroids and none of them develop erratic behaviors doesn't mean that the millions of others didn't. You should go back and read your pharmacology books again.

    Adverse effects from Corticosteroids:
    Neurological/Psychiatric: Convulsions, depression, emotional instability, euphoria, headache, increased intracranial pressure with papilledema (pseudotumor cerebri) usually following discontinuation of treatment, insomnia, mood swings, neuritis, neuropathy, paresthesia, personality changes, psychic disorders, vertigo
    Click to expand...
     
    MT15 said:
    So, I think the articles are misleading, not to mention the thread title.
    Click to expand...




    I mean, i did use the word ‘possibly’ in the thread title. :)

    FWIW i agree that Nancy is probably just trying to needle Trump a bit, but it’s fine with me since i love anything that ****es off trump and his enablers.
     
    Saint by the Bay said:
    Honestly, I'm not seeing any significant change in his behavior. He's been out of his mind for at least 20 years. He's behaving just as crazy and unhinged as he has on at least a dozen other points of his presidency.

    I want this over for good. I don't want to give him any way out.
    Click to expand...

    Yeah, I don't see much, if any, difference between now and 8 years ago lol
     
    zztop said:
    Yeah, I don't see much, if any, difference between now and 8 years ago lol
    Click to expand...



    Then it could be argued that Trump should have been removed years ago.. No one who acts as erratically as he does should be allowed to remain in charge of a country of 330 million people, simply becuase we’ve ‘gotten used to it’, or because some of you have normalized his behavior.




    .




    85D71ABE-E5DE-441C-89D2-D1AFCF01D4C2.jpeg
     
    Mr. Blue Sky said:
    Then it could be argued that Trump should have been removed years ago..
    Click to expand...

    I seem to recall there was discussion about doing just that back on the old PDB. What is sad really is how all the republicans were so adamantly against him during campaign, but once elected, all that disappeared. If Obama had said or done even 1/10th of the things Trump has, they would have rallied to the call of removing him. But they seemingly all lost their spines at the exact same moment, and let Trump do whatever he pleased
     
    Welp, I figured the c word would get tossed in there. And here we are. I still think this is a terrible move by Pelosi. Why would you want to distract people from what Trump is doing? Now the attention is on her rather than where it should be. Smh.

    Biden has a bigger lead now than Hillary ever did. I just don't get trying to fix what ain't broke. Her calling this a bipartisan effort is laughable. I just don't get it.
     
    SaulGoodmanEsq said:
    No. I just think Pelosi has been a bad 'figurehead' for the DNC. As far as how that relates to the thread, her tactic of pushing the 25th Amendment at this point isn't particularly helpful and only plays into the conspiracy theories.
    Click to expand...
    Even if Biden is elected, Trump will still be president until January 20th. You don't think he's going to tank the country as hard as he can with how personally he takes everything?
     
    DaveXA said:
    Welp, I figured the c word would get tossed in there. And here we are. I still think this is a terrible move by Pelosi. Why would you want to distract people from what Trump is doing? Now the attention is on her rather than where it should be. Smh.

    Biden has a bigger lead now than Hillary ever did. I just don't get trying to fix what ain't broke. Her calling this a bipartisan effort is laughable. I just don't get it.
    Click to expand...
    That 10 point national lead is in the popular vote which doesn't mean shirt as we saw in 2016. It's realistically 4-5%. And we've already been told and seen evidence of Trump accepting foreign meddling in 2016 and again in 2020.
     
    DaveXA said:
    Welp, I figured the c word would get tossed in there. And here we are. I still think this is a terrible move by Pelosi. Why would you want to distract people from what Trump is doing? Now the attention is on her rather than where it should be. Smh.

    Biden has a bigger lead now than Hillary ever did. I just don't get trying to fix what ain't broke. Her calling this a bipartisan effort is laughable. I just don't get it.
    Click to expand...
    What are you referring to?
     
    LA - L.A. said:
    What are you referring to?
    Click to expand...

    For whatever it's worth, some Republicans are calling Pelosi's proposal a coup attempt. This morning in a presser, Pelosi was trying to make the case that Congress can actually remove the President based on the wording of the 25th Amendment.

    And yeah, coup is the c word. I wouldn't have invoked it, but it's being said. Like a said earlier, this is a total distraction. Why do it a few weeks before the election? Makes no sense.
     
    Last edited:
    DaveXA said:
    And yeah, coup is the c word. I wouldn't have invoked it, but it's being said. Like a said earlier, this is a total distraction. Why do it a few weeks before the election? Makes no sense.
    Click to expand...



    I think you’re missing the point.

    Anyone with even a passing knowledge of politics knows that Pelosi and the Democrats alone cant remove this President, even though most with half a brain realize that he’s crazier than a ****house rat... But she’s floating the idea out there, getting people to talk about it (successfully- as demonstrated by this thread, as well as countless other message boards and news articles).. It’s bothering the obese orange toddler to the point where now he wants to have a medical evaluation on national tv by yet another quack ‘doctor’... So , no offense- but it isnt about you getting it, it’s about planting that seed of doubt about whatever might remain of the President’s mental acuity, and also getting him riled up so that he’ll do and say even MORE stupid stuff leading up to the election.
     
    Mr. Blue Sky said:
    I think you’re missing the point.

    Anyone with even a passing knowledge of politics knows that Pelosi and the Democrats alone cant remove this President, even though most with half a brain realize that he’s crazier than a ****house rat... But she’s floating the idea out there, getting people to talk about it (successfully- as demonstrated by this thread, as well as countless other message boards and news articles).. It’s bothering the obese orange toddler to the point where now he wants to have a medical evaluation on national tv by yet another quack ‘doctor’... So , no offense- but it isnt about you getting it, it’s about planting that seed of doubt about whatever might remain of the President’s mental acuity, and also getting him riled up so that he’ll do and say even MORE stupid stuff leading up to the election.
    Click to expand...

    I sincerely hope you're right, and if it works she'll get a tip of the cap from me because I think it's crucial to the survival of our democracy to remove the existential threat currently in the White House. I just believe this is the type of play you do when you're losing, not when it's this close and you're ahead. This is the kind of thing that can move undecideds in the wrong direction, although an argument can be made there aren't that many of them out there.
     

    Create an account or login to comment

    You must be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create account

    Create an account on our community. It's easy!

    Register

    Log in

    Already have an account? Log in here.

    Share this page

    General News Feed

    Fact Checkers News Feed

    Back
    Top Bottom