Will “mass deportation” actually happen (1 Viewer)

[superchuck500]

It’s so repulsive to see people cheering for what is basically 80% the same thing as the Holocaust - different end result but otherwise very similar.

Economists have said it would tank the economy and cause inflation - notwithstanding the cost.

Is it going to actually happen or is this Build The Wall 2.0?

 

[MT15]

They hide their faces because they don’t want to be doxxed.

And anyone with a removal order is a target. There are 1.4 million removal orders.

If they were doing things correctly they wouldn’t need to hide their faces because people wouldn’t be upset about what they are doing. But they are operating lawlessly. You know that. Why do you make excuses for them?

The government is now just cancelling every single resident status they can, so that ICE can swoop in and grab people and take them away when the people come for their regularly scheduled meetings. It has nothing to do with removal orders in a lot of cases.

It’s far easier to find the people who are trying to do things the right way because they show up faithfully for their scheduled meetings with Immigration. The number of criminals being deported right now has gone way, way down because it’s harder to find them. It might be dangerous for these brave masked men. (intense scornful sarcasm).

No, they’d rather hang out in a courthouse and grab people who are trying to navigate the system by operating within the system. They’d rather break a window and grab a man on his way home from church, with his children in the car. They’d rather drag a man out of his final interview before naturalization, who had come here legally and worked for years to become a citizen.

Quit defending the indefensible. There’s a right way and a wrong way to do this, apart from the debate on whether it should be done. These goons are doing everything the wrong way.

They sent at least 50 boys and men to El Salvador who were here LEGALLY, and had never broken an immigration law. They just grabbed people and sent them to a concentration camp with zero due process.

 

[Sendai]

If they were doing things correctly they wouldn’t need to hide their faces because people wouldn’t be upset about what they are doing. But they are operating lawlessly. You know that. Why do you make excuses for them?

The government is now just cancelling every single resident status they can, so that ICE can swoop in and grab people and take them away when the people come for their regularly scheduled meetings. It has nothing to do with removal orders in a lot of cases.

It’s far easier to find the people who are trying to do things the right way because they show up faithfully for their scheduled meetings with Immigration. The number of criminals being deported right now has gone way, way down because it’s harder to find them. It might be dangerous for these brave masked men. (intense scornful sarcasm).

No, they’d rather hang out in a courthouse and grab people who are trying to navigate the system by operating within the system. They’d rather break a window and grab a man on his way home from church, with his children in the car. They’d rather drag a man out of his final interview before naturalization, who had come here legally and worked for years to become a citizen.

Quit defending the indefensible. There’s a right way and a wrong way to do this, apart from the debate on whether it should be done. These goons are doing everything the wrong way.

They sent at least 50 boys and men to El Salvador who were here LEGALLY, and had never broken an immigration law. They just grabbed people and sent them to a concentration camp with zero due process.

As I stated previously, I hope the problem of the gentleman from Denmark will be properly corrected at his hearing. He was not aware of the removal order and apparently neither was the case worker.

A removal order makes their actions legal. A removal order means the individual had their day in court. Under that circumstance it’s the agents duty. And they need to protect themselves from being doxxed.

 

[Optimus Prime]

The Trump administration is trying to end a cornerstone immigration policy that requires the government to provide basic rights and protections to child immigrants in its custody.

The protections, which are drawn from a 1997 consent decree known as the Flores Settlement Agreement, limit the amount of time children can be detained by immigration officials. It also requires the government to provide children in its custody with adequate food, water and clean clothes.

The administration’s move to terminate the Flores agreement was long anticipated. In a court motion filed Thursday, the justice department argued that the Flores agreement should be “completely” terminated, claiming it has incentivized unauthorized border crossings and “prevented the federal government from effectively detaining and removing families”.

Donald Trump also tried to end these protections during his first term, making very similar arguments.

The move to end protections follows a slew of actions by the Trump administration that target children, including restarting the practice of locking up children along with their parents in family detention.

Immigration advocacy groups have alleged in a class-action lawsuit filed earlier this month that unaccompanied children are languishing in government facilities after the administration unveiled policies making it exceedingly difficult for family members in the US to take custody of them.

The president and lawmakers have also sought to cut off unaccompanied children’s access to legal services and make it harder for families in detention to seek legal aid.

“Eviscerating the rudimentary protections that these children have is unconscionable,” said Mishan Wroe, senior attorney at the National Center for Youth Law.

“At this very moment, babies and toddlers are being detained in family detention, and children all over the country are being detained and separated from their families unnecessarily.”

The effort to suspend the Flores agreement “bears the Trump administration’s hallmark disregard for the rule of law – and for the wellbeing of toddlers who have done no wrong”, said Faisal al-Juburi of the Texas-based legal non-profit Raices.

“This administration would rather enrich private prison contractors with the $45bn earmarked for immigrant detention facilities in the House’s depraved spending bill than to uphold basic humanitarian protections for babies.”………

Trump administration seeks to end basic rights and protections for child immigrants in its custody

Flores Settlement Agreement limits how long children can be detained and requires they be provided with food, water and clean clothes

www.theguardian.com