superchuck500
U.S. Blues
Offline
Most disasters in this country are at least 90% funded by the federal government - mostly through FEMA.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't think so. The deep red states aren't known for being intelligent.A hurricane hits Louisiana and FEMA isn’t around to help?
Louisiana is voting blue in 28.
I don’t believe I suggested withholding resources. It’s a question of how those resources are deployed and who is in charge.Who has the resources, Joe? State and local officials have the lay of the land. What they don't have are resources in the middle of a damn natural disaster. Do you think states struggling to rebuild have more resources than the federal government? No, clearly they don't. The federal government can provide financial, material, and knowledge resources that state governments simply cannot provide, and only an ignorant fool would think otherwise.
It is primarily the states job to prepare and plan for disasters. Who do you think is in a better position? So when disaster hits, who is in a better position to assess what is needed to recover? Who is in a better position to know and understand what is needed in that community? Who knows the infrastructure better than locals? Who has a better picture of the “lay of the land”? Governors and Mayors. That is their responsibility. They should be driving the effort to restore services and rebuild their communities.
FEMA, in my view, should play a support role. I have no issue with standard controls over fraud to prevent abuse. That’s good business. What concerns me is having more than one person in charge of the recovery. FEMA isn’t designed or setup to coordinate the recovery effort.
That’s how it should operate in my view. Streamline the responsibility and streamline the effort.
The state went to Clinton twice.I don't think so. The deep red states aren't known for being intelligent.
different era now. Trump has awakened the angry white vote.The state went to Clinton twice.
Where are the resources coming from without Fema? Sometimes we need big brotherI don’t believe I suggested withholding resources. It’s a question of how those resources are deployed and who is in charge.
Not to worry, the private sector always does everything better and more efficiently.Who has the resources, Joe? State and local officials have the lay of the land. What they don't have are resources in the middle of a damn natural disaster. Do you think states struggling to rebuild have more resources than the federal government? No, clearly they don't. The federal government can provide financial, material, and knowledge resources that state governments simply cannot provide, and only an ignorant fool would think otherwise.
Annnd, coming from Ohio I gotta agree.I don't think so. The deep red states aren't known for being intelligent.
Nvmd the fact that States that are prone to disasters are subsidizing small insurance companies because BIG insurance companies have abandoned those States! Homeowners insurance cost more than the home these days, add to that the specific ins you have to add depending on where you live i.e. (fire, flood, tornado). You know, FEMA Insurance Programs.Reading comprehension is not your strong suit......"Lay of the Land" doesn't mean much if they don't have the resources and/or ability to deploy them effectively because they were also victims of the disaster......
I never suggested withholding resources from the federal government.Reading comprehension is not your strong suit......"Lay of the Land" doesn't mean much if they don't have the resources and/or ability to deploy them effectively because they were also victims of the disaster......
But you do vote for individuals that would withhold those resources.I never suggested withholding resources from the federal government.
You clearly have trouble with reading comprehension.
Do you agree with every single decision your elected representative makes? I doubt it. But you vote for them anyway.But you do vote for individuals that would withhold those resources.
That's not the point, since the resources come from Americans. The problem is that if an area gets hit hard, then subsequently loses a lot of its ability to generate revenue for a period of time, then it needs a helping hand until it recovers. Then later that area's citizens will give that helping hand when another place that is hit. I know regions will band together to help each other, but it will further weaken the nation's bond. In the long term, this weakening of the federal government will lead to a splintering of the nation, and eventually we'll divide into separate nations.Where are the resources coming from without Fema? Sometimes we need big brother
I don't vote for candidates that state their goals are to disassemble services that serve the people.Do you agree with every single decision your elected representative makes? I doubt it. But you vote for them anyway.
probably not. Still be 75% red and blame Soro, Clinton, and Biden.A hurricane hits Louisiana and FEMA isn’t around to help?
Louisiana is voting blue in 28.
Neither do I.I don't vote for candidates that state their goals are to disassemble services that serve the people.
You say that, but you know it isn't true. I can honestly say that I have never voted for or supported any politician or political party whose goals are to stop services that were enacted to serve the People.Neither do I.