Trump loyalists in Congress to challenge Electoral College results in Jan. 6 joint session (Update: Insurrectionists storm Congress)(And now what?) (2 Viewers)

[superchuck500]

I guess it's time to start a thread for this. We know that at least 140 members of Congress have pledged to join the objection. Under federal law, if at least one member of each house (HOR and Senate) objects, each house will adjourn the joint session for their own session (limited at two hours) to take up the objection. If both houses pass a resolution objecting to the EC result, further action can take place. If both houses do not (i.e. if one or neither passes a resolution), the objection is powerless and the college result is certified.

Clearly this is political theater as we know such a resolution will not pass the House, and there's good reason to think it wouldn't pass the Senate either (with or without the two senators from Georgia). The January 6 joint session is traditionally a ceremonial one. This one will not be.

Many traditional pillars of Republican support have condemned the plan as futile and damaging. Certainly the Trump loyalists don't care - and many are likely doing it for fundraising purposes or to carry weight with the fraction of their constituencies that think this is a good idea.

https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL32717.pdf

 

[MT15]

He wasn’t just accused of giving a tour - he admitted it once the tapes came out, even though he denied it before that. So not exactly someone I’m going to think is telling the truth. He’s a proven liar.

 

[MT15]

 

[SamAndreas]

I bet you can't cite even one thing in the dossier that proved to be true that wasn't publicly reported before the dossiers existence.

That third clause you added on to filter any response from me is difficult to deal with, and even if I could deal with it, I don't understand how it would be relevant to anything surrounding this issue.

You clearly whipped out a senseless word salad in response to what I had said before.

Dossier is a term which was applied to it by someone in the media that doesn't describe what it is very well. It's a series of memos which were written over a period of time by the same person to report to others a variety of details which happened at different times, caused by a number of persons.

That reality of fact makes it difficult to deal with a conditional clause which insists on their being some time of it's "existence."

An "existence" to then be compared with when the memo details were otherwise publicly reported. It all sounds to me like a grand snipe hunt. While it might be fun for you, doesn't sound like it would be filled with that much fun for me.

Even if I did do as you have asked me to do, this request was a "moving of the goal posts," and if I complied now what would there be to prevent you from moving the goal posts again?

:-|

I gotcha on this and I bet you can't talk your way out of it.

 

[SamAndreas]

The videos speak for themselves and its completely different from the media/ January 6th committee narratives. What a surprise.

Who's that goofy guy on that first video who looks like he ought to have bees buzzing in and out of his slack open mouth while they use the empty inside space of his head as their hive to store their honey?

 

[MT15]

That third clause you added on to filter any response from me is difficult to deal with, and even if I could deal with it, I don't understand how it would be relevant to anything surrounding this issue.

You clearly whipped out a senseless word salad in response to what I had said before.

Dossier is a term which was applied to it by someone in the media that doesn't describe what it is very well. It's a series of memos which were written over a period of time by the same person to report to others a variety of details which happened at different times, caused by a number of persons.

That reality of fact makes it difficult to deal with a conditional clause which insists on their being some time of it's "existence."

An "existence" to then be compared with when the memo details were otherwise publicly reported. It all sounds to me like a grand snipe hunt. While it might be fun for you, doesn't sound like it would be filled with that much fun for me.

Even if I did do as you have asked me to do, this request was a "moving of the goal posts," and if I complied now what would there be to prevent you from moving the goal posts again?

:-|

I gotcha on this and I bet you can't talk your way out of it.

He read that assertion from one of the people he follows who do nothing but spew out propaganda. It’s nonsense, just as you so correctly point out, yet he doesn’t realize it’s nonsense because he buys every bit of crap they sell him. It’s truly much easier to lie to someone than convince them they’ve been lied to.

 

[DaveXA]

Barry Loudermilk, the Republican representative from Georgia who has been accused of giving tours of the Capitol building days before the January 6 insurrection, will lead a new House committee that will investigate the Democratic-controlled January 6 select committee.

On Tuesday, Loudermilk criticized the select committee, saying: “The J6 committee chose to ignore the facts and pursue a particular political narrative. I will not do this.”

“As chairman of the subcommittee on oversight, I’m focused on finding out what really happened on J6 to ensure it never happens again.”

Loudermilk is expected to focus on what he considers “security failure” that led up to the riots two years ago, CNN reports.

In an interview with the outlet, Loudermilk said: “I’m spending some time over there getting my hands wrapped around what we have. We’re going to be looking at what happened in the Capitol. What happened leading up to it? How did we have such a security failure?”

“The January 6 committee, they didn’t take that approach. That should have been something that they looked it. I think they looked more on the political side of it,” he said……

Lawmaker who gave tours of Capitol will lead inquiry of January 6 panel

Georgia Republican Barry Loudermilk denied giving tours related to the January 6 riots until video was released

www.theguardian.com

Foxes and henhouses, right?

 

[MT15]

Ellis is a horrible person who wears Christianity as a cloak to cover her awfulness.

 

[bdb13]

Ellis is a horrible person who wears Christianity as a cloak to cover her awfulness.

The old "I'm not a liar but am a stupid piece of shirt" angle. Good stuff.

 

[MT15]

The old "I'm not a liar but am a stupid piece of shirt" angle. Good stuff.

She also had a “funny” post about McConnell’s fall and subsequent hospitalization. She is just trash.

 

[MT15]

This is so true. They never examine the contradictions in nearly everything they believe. If it feels good to them they believe it, going through an unexamined life, just feeding their own paranoia.

 

[MT15]

I don’t think these cult members will ever learn.

 

[MT15]

 

[RebSaint]

Here's the "principled" Liz Cheney telling a lie that she knew was a lie and never corrected it. She probably learned that from her Dad.

Do you have a blog or website I can read? I've noticed that your posts are the most Patriotic on this board filled with filthy Marxists and other Democrats brainwashed by the Corporate, Obama media. I would also like to learn more about Hunter Biden's laptop and the Clinton crime family.

 

[MT15]

Another Tucker lie exposed. He claims the QAnon Shaman was escorted by police the entire time he was in the building. The footage he showed was actually police escorting him out of the building after the decision was made they didn’t have the ability to do wholesale arrests that day. He entered with a group who broke a window and then forced a door open from the inside.

 

[MT15]

Tucker has now seen this footage. A responsible person would put out a disclaimer showing that this guy did indeed get into the Capitol illegally and that he plead guilty and waived his right to trial.

Odds that Tucker will do so? 0% Tucker serves a different master than truth. He is aiding and abetting evil in this country.

 

[RebSaint]

You get worse by the day. You realize that was the day he forking died, don't you? Also, Sicknick died due to his injuries on Jan 6th.

fork the Jan 6th terrorist and all that support them. fork'em all!!!

This dude could have fell down the stairs and died from his injuries a few hours later, but noooo--the corporate, Biden, Clinton, Obama media wants you to be angry over the J6 event that was just a simple protest.

 

[SFIDC3]

This dude could have fell down the stairs and died from his injuries a few hours later, but noooo--the corporate, Biden, Clinton, Obama media wants you to be angry over the J6 event that was just a simple protest.

Can someone ban this idiot above? (Unless it's total sarcasm).....

 

[SaintForLife]

SFL: what a shock that you fell for Carlson’s BS. Lol. So predictable. Even though you should know by now that Carlson has no issue with lying to his audience, you still lap up the garbage.

Tucker is playing you for a fool.

I fell for the videos. Maybe I need new glasses.

Something new from the show trial January 6th committee:



I sure hope he's lying which is bad enough, but if he's not lying the January 6th committee was even less credible than I thought.

So who had access? Was it only the ABC new producer they hired or did only the staffers have access? I think he lying and he could only claim he didn't see it because the new videos contradicts the insurrection narrative.

It was a rally that turned into a violent riot. Anyone who is claiming it wasn't violent isn't a credible person. The recent videos show that it wasn't an insurrection.