Trump GA Indictment (1 Viewer)

[MT15]

I may be jumping the gun, but I thought we should probably keep the 3 major indictments in their separate threads.

And this Tweet reminded me that it looks like Monday could be the day.

 

[MT15]

This was posted as his mug shot. It looks like something you’d pay for…


The Mob Boss


Let’s stick with this one, for when his realty pops.

Yes, I’m still a bit suspicious- the lighting is way different than all the others.

 

[nolaspe]

 

[fooferdoggie]

wow such a badass.

 

[nolaspe]

 

[GrandAdmiral]

Two things...

1. They should've put that forker in prison orange.
2. fork Trump for messing up our pool and probably many more.

 

[GrandAdmiral]

OMG, I so want to put this in my Batman Discord server. Lol

 

[GrandAdmiral]

OMG, I so want to put this in my Batman Discord server. Lol

Ok, I posted it. If someone reported it, they'll be reporting me to... me.

 

[fooferdoggie]

only one problem He just surrendered.but glad he admitted to what he did.

 

[MT15]

So maybe it’s unfair to compare a college kid’s physique to Trump, so here’s an older guy:

 

[MT15]

Yeah, typical gaslighting to use “never surrender” on his … surrender photo.

 

[superchuck500]

only one problem He just surrendered.but glad he admitted to what he did.

It's actually fascinating

 

[zztop]

I wonder what else she did that we don't know about

 

[DJ1BigTymer]

So maybe it’s unfair to compare a college kid’s physique to Trump, so here’s an older guy:

Rex has many internet wins under his belt

 

[superchuck500]

Well now

So this is actually really interesting.

Still (one of the 'fake elector' defendants) claims that he acted under Trump's direction. He's saying this so that he can remove the case to federal court under the federal officer removal statute. I mentioned this before, but the caselaw holds that private parties (i.e. federal contractors) acting under the direction of a federal officer can also remove to federal court under the statute.

But the test is still the same - the federal officer has to have been acting under the color of federal law. The federal district court in Atlanta is going to have to resolve this question, starting with a hearing on Monday, and certainly the court's determination will eventually get to the Supreme Court.

But the stronger argument appears to be that there is nothing in the White House or DOJ authority that gives Trump, Meadows, or Clark authority to seek to influence the election in Georgia. If those efforts lose and the case remains in Georgia state court on the basis that there is no color of federal law, this filing now becomes evidence against Trump that the fake electors believed they were acting under Trump's direction.

 

[nolaspe]

 

[efil4]

So Cheesbro asked for speedy trial. An angle someone mentioned was Willis will have to call 90% of her witnesses which gives the rest of the defendants ability to call them, for each trial, and thinks if testimony changes just a bit, could soften the case. Yeah?

 

[nolaspe]

 

[Neworleansfan]

6'3 215? no way.

This man is 6’3 215