Intensesaint
Well-known member
Offline
A place for all the gaffs, slip-ups and overall outlandish things Democratic candidates will say or do in lead up to the 2020 Election.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You’re still not MAP hall monitorThis board is only five months old.
Take that crap somewhere else. Everyone running wants major gun law changes everyone that was in the running had a stance you would not like. MAJOR changes.
This is hijacking the thread and irrelevant to what the thread is.
Feel free to start your own thread about gun laws.
I’ll let that 1st sentence wrestle a bit to see what sense winsCertainly you don't believe I give any analysis that you offer a lot weight either.
Having said that, you may have noticed that there has been an apparent relationship between how "woke" the candidates have been and poor performances with the electorate. And this is among Democrats. It's been nice to watch.
It's hard to say why exactly Warren plummeted. I think it is safe to say that casting Bernie in the role of her oppressor didn't have the result she hoped to achieve.
People are tired of this intersectionality, who has the better claim of being oppressed nonsense.
Sorry, it's time to find a new hobby.
So says the guy who wants to ban books, and movies, and political pamphlets, and . . . .You’ve argued for a good 6 years thst their vote counts more than regular folk’s
Why quibble now?
So says the guy who wants to ban books, and movies, and political pamphlets, and . . . .
So, you are a book burner too?You have to admit, it seems a little, well, inconsistent to be perfectly fine with ultra wealthy people paying for political influence, yet upset that Bloomberg can pay for an armed security detail.
It is exactly what you are saying. We have been over it before. You want the government to ban books if they are political and paid for, in any way, via corporate funds.Yes, that is absolutely what I said. Good lord, man, you have really devolved.
LOL. You just accuse me of being for rich people being able to buy political influence. When did I say that?I said nothing about banning books, but you just keep building those straw men. You should have an army by now.
Are you suggesting that it is not possible to overturn the parts of Citizens United related to campaign finance without banning political books?i assume you are alluding to my thoughts on Citizens United. If so - then if you are for overturning Citizens United you are for banning books - as well as movies, political pamphlets, etc.
You have to admit, it seems a little, well, inconsistent to be perfectly fine with ultra wealthy people paying for political influence, yet upset that Bloomberg can pay for an armed security detail.
Biden is having an incredibly good night.
Wins Minnesota and Virginia. Two states very close in 2016 that Democrats must hold.
AP has called Minnesota for Biden:Biden also won N. Carolina. Bernie won Colorado. Not sure Minn is called.
I think Bloomberg and Warren are very much playing a spoiler role. Bernie could have won Minn without them in the race.