Intensesaint
Well-known member
Offline
A place for all the gaffs, slip-ups and overall outlandish things Democratic candidates will say or do in lead up to the 2020 Election.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You're right. "Confused" would be a much better word.A guy who has a gun at home for protection, but thinks guns should be banned is not a hypocrite.
No, its nothing like that.So Bloomberg has not done anything that would make it harder for someone to hire a security detail like the one he has.
I don't think you really have a point here.
It's like saying that a billionaire who has an effective tax rate of 10% is a hypocrite for calling for higher taxes on billionaires because he's not voluntarily paying more than required.
Bernie isn't a socialist.
No, everyone currently has the right to a security detail if they want it. I said minimike has a greater NEED for security, not a right.
If the law made the firearms carried by his detail illegal, then they shouldn't be able to use those firearms.
part of the reason the security is required is because of the availability of firearms.
We have to start looking at 50 year solutions to the gun problem. Target manufacturing first. Eventually the number of guns on the streets will become more manageable.
I am quoting your whole post...
I been carry ing a firearm with permit for about 15 years now. And there's been no problems... again it's not the gun, but the persons intent... I can see both side, but for discussion purposes here... You say start with manufactureing... I one three guns from Nazi germany, one from Soviet Russia, one from Imperial Japan and one from WWII great Britian... Manufacturing of these guns have been stopped for 75 years, yet are still avalible... I do understand your point and I agree to some extent. But don't make it harder for a law abiding citizen to get a gun for protection of his family... make it harder for the criminal to keep a gun...
As to millionaires and politicians should get armed security and need it more... They may need it more because of the nutcases... but people are getting killed over as little as $20 or a 1/8th of weed, or an old car..
But back to this thread... I been hearing Beto will join Biden's team... if true that would be a sure win for Trump....
Is there some law that prevents you from having a security detail?
That's my point. If all we had on the street were 75 year old Nazi guns, i don't think we'd have much of a gun problem.
Why not?
That's my point. If all we had on the street were 75 year old Nazi guns, i don't think we'd have much of a gun problem.
I'm not concerned about law abiding citizens having a problem obtaining their 10th firearm or a civilian version of a M16A2. They don't need 10 guns or a M16A2, so I don't care if they can't get them.
You're right. "Confused" would be a much better word.
How many 75 year old Nazi guns do you think are in circulation today?
There are over 300 million firearms in the US.
Literally? Hundreds of thousands.How many 75 year old Nazi guns do you think are in circulation today?
There are over 300 million firearms in the US.
So you gun guys have a problem with a licensed professional?So that means they should have the right to things that other people do not have a right to?
So you gun guys have a problem with a licensed professional?
Well then the logical answer is take your classes pass what ever checks so you can also be as trained and and checked as a professional.
Might I suggest take the pathic 2nd amendment crying game to a a separate thread. For tough guys with guns you guys cry a bunch.
Or submit yourself to the training, mental and background checks those guys go thru.
My point exactly was I own old guns from numerous countries. If you stopped all us production they would still be here...
I'm not concerned about law abiding citizens having a problem obtaining their 10th firearm or a civilian version of a M16A2. They don't need 10 guns or a M16A2, so I don't care if they can't get them.
Just out of curiosity... what gives you the right to decide what another person needs?
I believe I have 7 guns from WWII. That's 7 that I own and bought legally, paid for, passed a background check for... And are locked in a safe and off the streets...
So is me owning 7 guns a problem in your eyes?